UPDATE: The poll worker is now an ex-poll worker.
A Roslindale resident went to vote early at the Conley School today. As you might expect, it wasn't at all crowded. She reports she got into the back room (the school has two rooms for voting) just in time to hear one of the poll workers educating the room on his political beliefs:
Older gentlemen cracking wise about Ted Kennedy being a murderer; because that's so funny and appropriate for a polling station!
Before that, he was going on and on about how we should get rid of one-third of our politicians at every level. Just rubbed me the wrong way.
I said something to the cop who checks you out and he asked him to keep it down. And then he apologized for offending me (while I stood there waiting for my husband). But it was really a sorry/notsorry apology. It was surreal and I couldn't believe none of the other volunteers called him out on his BS.
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
O-fish-l is a poll volunteer?
By Chris Rich
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 8:31am
Who knew?
Poll workers are employees
By dmk
Sat, 09/13/2014 - 7:48pm
In Boston, Election Poll Workers set in place to oversee voting are actually City of Boston employees for one day - the day of the election - and are paid a limited stipend equivalent to about $9/hr. It is a single day appointment with no benefits.
Persons who are poll workers are required to attend a 2-3 hr class once per year to learn or refresh their job expectations and review changes - if any - in voting laws. It takes shorter time for those experienced, and longer for the newbies.
The election day starts at 6 AM to open and set up the polling place by 7 AM. Blank ballots have to be accounted-for and counted to assure what was sent matched a receipt that traveled with the ballots from City Hall. There is an opening and closing process that must be witnessed by at least 2 people to assure all ballots and machines are handled properly.
Throughout the day Inspectors (the people that check you in and out) oversee the rules and periodically check the count on the machine with their check-in and check-out books. At the end of the night all 3 must agree or you get to stay there late until you figure out what happened. A clerk assigned takes minutes of all of the things that happen including unruly people, problems with aggressive campaign workers, when someone needs assistance (the blind for example), when people go to dinner and lunch, and anything else of note, including the periodic calls from City Hall to check in on you.
A Warden oversees the rules and works with people who need to change addresses, are lost and don't know where to vote, or who have recently moved and want to vote even if they are not on the voter list. The law requires that every opportunity is afforded a person in order to allow them to vote, even if it is hand-counted for a host of reasons at the end of the night.
Quite often poll workers are subject to people who feel they can change the voting laws on site, don't like the choices given to them, and often fail completely to fathom why in a party primary, you cannot have one of each ballot because they like someone on each of them.
Of course there are write-ins. At this point Mickey Mouse has easily won several national elections. He just failed to get enough signatures to be on the official ballot. It happens. What a waste.
The issue as described is not condoned and it is the responsibility of the site warden to take action and if necessary either dismiss the poll worker or get clearance from city hall to do so. City Hall sends roving overseers out several times a day to make certain all is well as well.
Much of this is not seen by the public. They get to come in, vote, and get on their way. It is a very long day (and night).
After the ballots leave the polling place they are taken by the police officer to city hall to be checked in. Once in the door they are clocked and their paycheck ends for the night. However, if something is amiss with the box and bag they brought in, they must remain and guard it until an election commissioner audits the contents and dismisses them. This means they are guarding your votes off the clock. Those people working at City Hall pull all-nighters.
The other unsung heros are the custodians of the buildings used as polling places. They cannot go home until the poll workers clear all of the ballots and processes. If they are lucky they leave by 8:30 pm. If not... well get a cup of coffee or a pillow.
Then every so often something shines that makes it all worth while. Like the guy that voted and came back to the check in table to shake everyone's hand with tears in his eyes. He had just become a citizen and it was his first time voting in the USA, and an experience where he didn't have to duck a beating or risk getting shot, but was greeted with respect and a smile and addressed as "sir."
We take too much for granted.
I can't recall even a single
By anon
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 8:37am
I can't recall even a single time that I've voted in the city of Boston in which I hadn't heard someone standing in line loudly make disparaging remarks about Obama and/or democrats. It's disheartening that local conservatives can't be more respectful of the voting process.
Yeah, but asshats in line,
By lbb
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 9:05am
Yeah, but asshats in line, that's not too surprising. Poll workers should mind their p's and q's. The job of a poll worker is to facilitate the democratic process, not to soapbox, and if you can't keep your political opinions to yourself for one day, don't volunteer to work the polls.
One need not be a
By Molokhia
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 9:11am
One need not be a conservative to dislike some things that capital-D Democratic.
There's a difference between
By anon
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 12:32pm
There's a difference between making critical remarks and derogatory comments.
It is different if it is
By DrewD
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 9:19am
It is different if it is somebody standing in line vs a poll worker. It still might be rude, but a random voter voicing opinions is not as big of a deal as a poll worker who is there to make sure that everyone feels safe to vote.
conservatives everywhere seem
By tape
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 10:13am
conservatives everywhere seem to have great disdain for the voting process.
Report this to town clerk or city clerk's office
By Arl
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 8:40am
It is very important to report this to the authority that runs elections in your town or city.
Well
By bosguy22
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 8:57am
He was 100% about getting rid of (at least) 1/3 of our politicians. "Politics" was never supposed to be a career, yet now we have people (on both sides of aisle and at every level of government) who have never held a a job they weren't elected to.
Oh, and Kennedy did kill someone...not quite murder, but someone died because of his actions. Not an appropriate joke, but it's still amazing how selective people's memories are. I'd guess that if that happened today, he'd be in jail...or at least (I hope) not reelected.
Says you and says him
By lbb
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 9:06am
...and keep your opinion to yourself if you're a poll worker, no matter how "right" you're convinced that you are.
Who gives a fuck?
By Scratchie
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 9:13am
It's still illegal.
And you seem to have neglected to include the calculations you performed to determine that "1/3" (at least) is the magic number that needs to be eliminated.
Sorry
By bosguy22
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 9:21am
Maybe it's 1/5, 4/5, 4/7, 3/8, 1/3. The point is we have a bloated "ruling class" that is inefficient and costly.
OK
By Scratchie
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 9:31am
How about we start by eliminating your reps and senators? OK with you?
Sure
By bosguy22
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 9:34am
Just increase the size of the districts covered.
Brilliant!
By lbb
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 10:11am
Yeah, I like that - give you less representation, give you less voice, make your elected officials beholden to more interests and more big-money influence. Where will you be then?
There's a way out of this. Just say, "Looks like I didn't really think this thing through" and bow out.
In case you have not noticed
By SwirlyGrrl
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 11:40am
MA has had exactly that going on for years in the Federal arena as the Commonwealth ages and more people move west and south.
Due to each state having two senators regardless of population, we already have less representation than Vermont or Wyoming.
Nail it.
By SoBoYuppie
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 9:14am
It amazes me how people other people on pedestals.
Thomas Jefferson raped his slaves...he has a monument. smh.
- The original SoBo Yuppie.
Laura Bush killed someone too
By anon
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 9:32am
Laura Bush killed someone too, aso it seems that people in politics are not the greatest people, yet I don't understand why you are defending the actions of someone hurting the integrity of the voting process, I thought conservatives were all into that these days.
Laura Bush Killed a Guy
By The Beer Guy
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 10:09am
http://youtu.be/9hnN5oF-WUc
And?
By bosguy22
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 10:38am
How many times was she reelected? What offices did she hold? Are the building a library in her honor?
They already built a library
By anon
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 11:00am
They already built a library in Laura Bush's honor, in 2009, the Laura Bush Community Library in Austin TX.
She also is represented in the George Bush Library and Museum in Dallas. From their website:
Bush was reelected a 2nd term
By Daan(not here)
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 12:51pm
Bush launched a sovereign nation without legitimate basis. His made concious decisions that resulted in Americans dying. Yet he was reelected and still has not faced a war crimes trial.
Yeah, I think it's called
By Chris Rich
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 9:00am
.."electioneering" and is supposedly prohibited within some defined distance from a voting area.
Someone with more knowledge of process than I will hopefully provide details.
He was probably just there to make sure the 'coloreds' don't try a spot of voter fraud as it is so endemic and a very important issue for teahadists.
This, of course, led to a bit of multi tasking as it is always important to vilify the late Senator at every turn like it's some right wing cred rosary to read aloud.
And those electioneering rules are just insidious over regulation, unlike the 'real regulation' to keep an eye on votor fraud.
How is?
By bosguy22
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 9:20am
Complaining about a dead Senator "electioneering"? He isn't running, nor is anyone he's related to, and it's a primary, so you're voting for candidates who are all members of his party.
Exactly.
By Dan Farnkoff
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 9:36am
But we "progressives" never miss a chance to try to stifle speech with which we disagree.
It's not electioneering
By Waquiot
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 9:34am
He was commenting about a dead man who wasn't on the ballot. Were he talking about someone on the ballot, that would be electioneering. What he's doing was being boorish.
I agree that it was unprofessional talk, but it's not like the guy can influence the outcome of the election. If you think that is the case, go back to the Conley at 8 and make sure they report what is on the slip.
I've never done it, but working the polls for 13 hours would appear mind numbing. They often have trouble finding people to do it. It's my precinct, and I've never had issues with people there, so I am willing to cut them some slack.
But let's not forget the important part- VOTE!!!
Thanks Waquoit.
By Chris Rich
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 9:52am
I was confident someone solid from here would cover the process nuance. For all I know it extended to parties, etc.
Rude yes, illegal no
By Ron Newman
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 9:52am
It would be illegal if he were expressing an opinion about a candidate on today's ballot.
He represents the talk radio demo.
By bulgingbuick
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 8:55am
These people are aging out and hitting cemeteries near you in large numbers.
And being replaced by
By lbb
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 9:07am
...young born-again-peckerwoods left and right.
Where they will vote straight
By anon
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 9:10am
Where they will vote straight ticket (D) for the rest of their un-life.
Yes, won't it be nice when
By Patricia
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 9:23am
Yes, won't it be nice when they all die off? Then we can all think the same without any pesky counter opinions!
Yay!
Yes, won't it be nice when
By anon
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 9:38am
The key is think, which this poll worker and many other of the talk radio/Boston Herald demo rarely participate in. How anyone here is doing anything but chastising the poll worker, even if you are a repub, is hard to understand.
Goodness. You don't value
By Patricia
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 11:48am
Goodness. You don't value opposing opinions because you think the people giving you those opposing opinions don't think.
And you don't see anything wrong with your outlook at all.
There is no way possible people have different perspectives, different values than you and different opinions. No, they are unthinking radio listening, boston herald reading morons. Is that it?
You don't value opposing
By Scratchie
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 1:51pm
Feel free to provide some evidence to the contrary.
The counter opinions?
By bulgingbuick
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 9:38am
24/7 of Faux Newscorp et al? That potpourri of wing nut opinion?
Well what do you
By anon
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 9:59am
Expect? That propaganda channel, MSNBC isn't available on basic cable. These are retirees after all, many who are living on a budget. Not everybody can watch TYT or read Salon.
Ahhh, the old "Faux" News
By Patricia
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 10:47am
Ahhh, the old "Faux" News canard. That gets pulled out when people of opposing opinions can't be reconciled.
Does it ever get old?
Here's your problem. You
By anon
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 10:51am
Here's your problem. You think Fox has "opinions." The phrase you're looking for is "purposefully misleading and incorrect propaganda that's harmful to the country."
I don't watch Fox or any of
By Patricia
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 11:43am
I don't watch Fox or any of those cable "news" shows, but obviously you do. Again, don't you get tired of it all? It seems to me that many people cannot understand how someone can have a different view on things, so it's easy to blame a cable station because it's the only way that person can justify that maybe they don't have all the answers. Like I said, I don't watch Fox but I've had that thrown in my face at U Hub before because I dared voice something different. You can disagree with me, that's fine, but isn't this silly?
I find the lefts fascination with Fox news tiresome. No skin off my teeth but to me it is a lame way to get out of a discussion. And, those that do blame Fox news for all the ills in the world can't see their own stubbornness.
Like I said, does it ever get old?
The Pee Wee Herman defense
By bulgingbuick
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 11:58am
I know you are but what am I.
Sorry, don't see what you're
By Patricia
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 12:48pm
Sorry, don't see what you're trying to say.
Faux is a 24/7 orgy of
By bulgingbuick
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 4:42pm
bashing all things with a D and all "mainstream media". This glass house of righteousness is incredible fragile.
And George W. Bush is still
By anon_wd
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 7:37pm
And George W. Bush is still some sort of evil supergenius that controls/ set into motion events occurring almost 6 years after leaving office in some corners of MSNBC's programming (Melissa Harris-Perry, particularly)
The effects of his disastrously bad decisions...
By Michael Kerpan
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 8:33pm
... will linger for quite a long time. After all, the boneheaded geopolitical decisions made by the UK and France after WW1 are still haunting us almost 100 years later.
No that was
By bulgingbuick
Wed, 09/10/2014 - 8:35am
Dick Cheney
Does it get old that there's
By anon
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 1:02pm
Does it get old that there's a massive corporation hell bent on destroying the country? No. No, I think it's pretty safe to assume that doesn't "get old."
If you silence the voice of
By anon
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 10:48am
If you silence the voice of the brave man who still rants about Ted Kennedy years after he's already dead, you've truly done democracy a disservice. Who will speak for the wingnuts!
Rubs Me The Wrong Way Too....
By Roach McKrackin
Tue, 09/09/2014 - 8:58am
Dude clearly doesn't know what he's talking about... Getting rid of 1/3 of politicians at every level isn't nearly enough!
Pages