Hey, there! Log in / Register

Boston readying new fee for handling storm runoff, says most homeowners won't have to pay more, but many businesses will

The Boston Water and Sewer Commission says it plans to start levying a new "stormwater charge" next year to expand and improve the city's current 600-mile, 30,000-catchbasin storm-runoff network, both to reduce the amount of contaminants that flow into our rivers and Boston Harbor and to handle greater surges from increasingly heavy rainfall spurred by climate change.

The commission says its current estimates are that most homeowners - and small multi-family buildings of up to six units - will not see any change in their overall bills, because the new charge will be accompanied by a reduction in the monthly sewage fee. The commission says it is also working on a grant program to help homeowners who do see an overall increase reduce the amount of impermeable surfaces on their land.

However, the commission says other property owners could see increases or, in many cases new monthly bills - including landowners who do not currently use BWSC services but whose land is covered in large amounts of surfaces from which rain now runs into catch basins, such as parking lots.

Charging this way will mean that thousands of properties - like parking lots - that place a demand on the stormwater system, but don’t receive water and sewer service from BWSC, will be charged for stormwater services in the future. BWSC is in the process of notifying these customers of the importance of stormwater management and their shared responsibility in supporting these critical services.

All properties with more than 400 square feet of impervious areas will be charged because they contribute pollutants that are transported into BWSC’s stormwater system, requiring BWSC to manage runoff and ensure compliance with regulations. Charges will be based on the amount of impervious surface on the property. Properties paying the charge include, but are not limited to, residential properties, commercial and industrial properties, non‐profit organizations, schools, colleges/universities, houses of worship, state and federal-owned properties, and parking lots.

The commission says it's spent $9.2 million over the past five years in bolstering the city's 207 outfalls into the Charles, Mystic and Tobin and Boston Harbor but that the new fee will let it boost that amount to $44.6 million over the next two years, both to repair and expand the current network and to add new systems to "recharge" rainwater right into the ground, rather than letting it flow into waterways. This is on top of the roughly $12.7 million the commission says it spends annually just on maintaining the existing system.

Stormwater is generated when precipitation falls on hard impervious surfaces like roofs, driveways, roads, or sidewalks and "runs off," rather than absorbing into the ground as it would in nature. When stormwater flows over hard surfaces, it collects litter, sediment, and other pollutants, like motor oil and fertilizer. Catch basins in our roadways capture stormwater and convey it through a network of underground pipes called storm drains. Storm drains then release stormwater into our water bodies via stormwater outfalls. Stormwater does not receive treatment at the Deer Island wastewater treatment plant, which means that all the pollutants carried by stormwater enter our lakes, rivers, streams, and Boston Harbor.

In a city that receives an average of 48 inches of rainfall annually, stormwater runoff also contributes to inland flooding. Due to climate change, storms are becoming more frequent and more intense, which will result in more flooding in the coming years if BWSC and the City do not begin to adapt now.

The commission says that in addition to more traditional systems, such as pipes and outfalls, it is also working on "green" systems to keep runoff from getting into those pipes to begin with.

Green infrastructure acts like nature and catches rainwater at the point where it falls, allowing it to soak into the ground slowly. This method
enhances infiltration, improves water quality and groundwater levels, and creates green spaces within urban areas, among other benefits.

The commission says Boston already has several such installations, which include "rain gardens, porous paving materials, and stormwater bioswales that allow stormwater to filter into the soil around trees instead of running off into streets," including at the new City Hall Plaza, Harrison Avenue "tree trenches," a "rain garden at South and Bussey streets in Roslindale and at several BPS schools.

The commission provided details of how it plans to figure out the monthly fee for each property in the city:

The Commission will use Geographic Information System (GIS) data and pictures taken from planes or satellites above our City to determine the amount of impervious (hard) surface on each property. The greater the amount of impervious surface, the larger the charge. ...

The stormwater charge will be billed based on the customer's property classification as small residential or non-small residential. Small Residential Properties (SRP) have one to six units. Non-Small Residential Properties (NSRP) include all other property types, including residential with more than six units, institutional, industrial, and commercial.

To calculate the stormwater charge, a unit called the Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) will be used. One ERU represents the amount of impervious area on a typical Small Residential Property in Boston, which is 2,164 square feet. The Commission is currently determining how much the charge per ERU will be.

  • Properties with less than 400 square feet of impervious surface will not be charged for stormwater.
  • Small Residential Properties will be charged a single rate for one ERU.
  • Non-Small Residential Properties will be charged per ERU of impervious area on the property. To calculate the stormwater charge, BWSC will divide the total impervious area of the property by 2,164 square feet to determine the number of ERUs and round up. For example, a property with 45,000 square feet of impervious area will be charged for 21 ERUs.

    Working with property owners to reduce storm runoff into sewers is not a new idea in Boston. The Back Bay, the South End, Bay Village, Chinatown and parts of the Fenway, East Boston, the North End, downtown and Beacon Hill are covered by "groundwater conservation overlay" zoning, in which property owners proposing new buildings or significant changes to existing ones have to install "groundwater recharge" systems to inject rainwater into the ground, rather than letting it flow into storm drains - to protect the hundreds of buildings that sit on wood pilings that would begin to rot should they dry out if the water table falls too much.

    Neighborhoods: 
    Topics: 
    Free tagging: 


    Ad:


    Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

    Comments

    Well done BWSC. A perfect mix of green ideas and practicality.

    up
    Voting closed 2

    As written, it seems absurd. Again, here are the categories:

    A: Spaces with less than 400sf of impermeable surface. That is approximately two parking spots. These will not have fees levied on them. Unless you live in the Skinny House, this is not you.

    B: All residential properties with six or fewer units, not matter how much impermeable surface, will have fees levied at the same rate. So if you have a tiny house and no driveway and no garage (say, 800 sf of impermeable surface), you will be levied the same as a single-story six-unit condo complex with a parking lot or a mega-mansion with tennis courts. You get levied the same rate, 1 ERU.

    C. Everything else, including 7+ unit residential properties and commercial properties.

    Which homeowners would see an increase? Maybe owners of enormous units in enormous developments?

    up
    Voting closed 2

    Another issue: besides ripping up parking lot or patio pavement and leaving it unpaved, is there anything a property can do to reduce the charge?

    What if they collect roof gutter runoff in rain barrels and use it to water the garden, or even flush the toilets? What if the runoff from pavement is handled on-site in a swale, rather than running into a city storm drain? What if the pavement is permeable? If the fees don’t incentivize stuff like this, what’s the point of them?

    up
    Voting closed 2

    Has nothing to do with any homeowner. Look at the granularity. There are three categories: one which is a null set, one which all the homeowners are in, no matter what we do, and the third one, which only affects big properties - residences only get into that category by being more than six to a property.

    There is nothing at all any homeowner can do to change category or charge under this policy as written. Tear up your patio, use rain barrels, have a garden, build tennis courts, pave your whole lawn... there isn't even a mechanism for any of that to matter, because you can't move down to the first category or up to the third, and every homeowner pays the same amount.

    First and foremost this is a charge on huge buildings, and on parking lots. Lots can now be charged for runoff even though they don't have a water supply. That's an incentive to develop or remove parking lots.

    up
    Voting closed 2

    1. It's only a matter of time before residents are taxed too.
    2. Why aren't they taxing colleges and universities?

    up
    Voting closed 1

    But just in case:

    Properties paying the charge include, but are not limited to, residential properties, commercial and industrial properties, non‐profit organizations, schools, colleges/universities, houses of worship, state and federal-owned properties, and parking lots.

    Also, technically, it's a fee, not a tax. Colleges and churches aren't taxed for their property, but they can be, um, fee'd.

    up
    Voting closed 4

    It is a fee for the service of removing runoff.

    Colleges and universities are going to pay a shit ton for this - think about how much impervious surface is on the NU campus, the Harvard Medical Area, etc.

    up
    Voting closed 2

    Sounds like a sound environmental policy. Cleaning up the Harbor and rivers is one of the great success stories of government anywhere in recent memory but we're seeing increasing algae from runoff that's closing them so makes sense to me.

    up
    Voting closed 4

    Fine homeowners with completely paved yards. Give money to those who plant trees

    up
    Voting closed 1

    If a city was a body then paved yards are permanent plasters that result in poisoning those parts of the body. They become festering sores slowly encouraging cancers to spread across the body. They are geographical cancers.

    up
    Voting closed 2

    Just wanted to compliment that description. Well said.

    up
    Voting closed 1

    If the BWSC, city or state were to subsidize the cost of barrels designed to catch rain water then that would reduce how much potable water is used for gardening. This would reduce the water drawn from Quabbin as well as reducing the demands on the sewage system.

    Any home owner who grows their own food but uses water provided by BWSC is still charged sewage fees. This water never enters the sewage system. Sewage charges for this water are therefore falsely applied as well as ethically wrong.

    An agency with policies that are fully directed toward water conservation and overall health of the city would 1) encourage use of water sources other than Quabbin (i.e., rainwater) and 2) encourage other activities that reduce overall demands on the local infrastructure (i.e. growing food). Therefore subsidizing the cost of rain water collectors reduces wear and tear on the sewage system as well as reducing dependency on Quabbin.

    This plan fits perfectly with the goal of directing food wastes toward composting which the city - and we tax payers - are paying.

    up
    Voting closed 2

    You can get a second meter for outdoor faucets and irrigation. It costs $325 up front plus whatever plumbing changes are needed. You will not be billed for sewerage on the second meter.

    But I agree, there should be incentives to use reclaimed water for gardening and non-potable uses aside from just lower billable water usage.

    up
    Voting closed 1

    I don't recall the details, but there's something about getting a separate meter installed on your garden hose so that you're only charged for water delivery on that volume, not for sewerage.

    (At one point I looked up the opposite -- using rain barrel water in the house, e.g. for laundry -- and the legality of that seemed unclear due to both cross-connection issues and stormwater handling regulations.)

    up
    Voting closed 3

    For burst pipes that occur all over the city, especially in winter, including flooded vehicles, businesses and residences

    Loss of life likee to poor guy in the South End a couple of years ago

    up
    Voting closed 2

    Did you bother reading the article?

    Its a fee based on impervious surfaces, not on metered runoff.

    up
    Voting closed 1