The Yellow Peril

The Globe finally weighs in on a topic very familiar to UHub readers: the wasteful free distribution of 4-pound phone books, by two competing companies.

Earlier:
When phone books attack
Yellow onslaught
Yellow Book: The annoying phone directory
Big fat yellow books on the stoop

|
Read more about:

Globe forgets what blogs are again

By adamg | Tue, 03/18/2008 - 12:11pm

A few blocks away, 33-year-old Jason Muth vented his disgust in his blog.

Um, link? In this case, you can't even find his blog easily on Google, because he doesn't use his last name there (you can, however, find his LinkedIn page).

He is sanguine, because the important thing is that the issue get out there, but sheesh.

Or as Riggs in Boston puts it:

... I've been exasperated by the Globe in the past. It's bewildering to me why the Times gets it so right, while the Globe founders so pathetically. Is the Times not funding the Globe properly? Is the leadership on Morrisey Boulevard so Yankee stubborn that they refuse to use the proven model of the Times? ...

My Sanguinity

By Jason (not verified) | Tue, 03/18/2008 - 12:45pm

Wow, I've never been called sanguine. I like that one!

You'd bloody well better like it!

By Ron Newman | Tue, 03/18/2008 - 12:47pm

But the op-ed page knows what blogs are

By Ron Newman | Tue, 03/18/2008 - 1:55pm

Look at the right column of today's op-ed page. A whole list of quotes from local blogs. Didn't you use to do something like this for the Globe?

Yep

By adamg | Tue, 03/18/2008 - 3:19pm

Only in City Weekly, though.

Riddle me this?

By SwirlyGrrl | Tue, 03/18/2008 - 12:16pm

Why does a single-family house in a neighborhood of single-family houses receive three identical phone books in a single bag?

The nearest multi-family dwelling is 1/2 mile away.

Guess

By Gareth | Tue, 03/18/2008 - 12:30pm

My guess is that the distributor is being paid per book distributed. It's either your porch or the dumpster, and they're less likely to get busted for dumping on your porch.

Remember when the phone company owned all of your phones?

By Ron Newman | Tue, 03/18/2008 - 12:40pm

Once upon a time, the phone company owned all of the telephones in your house, and you could only rent them. Later, you could own your own phones, but you still had to tell the phone company how many extensions you had. The phone company delivered as many phone books as you had extensions.

Perhaps they're still using these very outdated records?

I remember that

By Gareth | Tue, 03/18/2008 - 12:52pm

I remember moving to a town where private citizens didn't own their phones and having Ma Bell try to repossess our phone, which they felt was illegal contraband.

Three Wire Thingies on Wall

By SwirlyGrrl | Tue, 03/18/2008 - 3:04pm

Bingo!

There were three extensions in the house at one time. I forgot about that.

We used to have one of the old retired rotary phones up in the playroom, because little fingers were unlikely to be able to dial China by just playing around.

We still have a Bell System wall-mounted rotary phone

By adamg | Tue, 03/18/2008 - 3:14pm

In the kitchen. It would be quite the effective deterrent against any intruder if only we could get it off the wall in time ...

Talking Phone Book

By Gary McGath (not verified) | Tue, 03/18/2008 - 12:35pm

The one that really annoys me is something called the Talking Phone Book. It's just a phone book with no audio features, and its name makes no sense.

Haven't seen that one in years

By Ron Newman | Tue, 03/18/2008 - 12:38pm

Is it still around? The 'talking' gimmick was that each display ad contained a 4 or 5-digit code. You could call a toll-free number that was prominently printed on the directory's front cover, then punch in the code to learn more about the business.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.