We're getting a publication that uses 'Beantown' in its name unironically

The first thought I always have about most parenting publications is that they're going to be totally irrelevant to my family and most families I know (i.e., most of the stuff assumes all-white family, two hetero parents, female parent doing most of the parenting and socializing only with other female parents, biological children, disposable income, children without disabilities, etc.).

So I saw this one had tabs for "adoption" and "single mom" and was a bit intrigued, though assumed it was still going to be awful, coming from a publication that encourages choosing strollers based on the social status they will bring you. Then I clicked, and both tabs went to empty pages! Hopefully they'll stay that way. Just don't even bother trying.

Maybe, if you're talking like highly educated Cambridgey sorts of folks, but I think this is more marketed toward the people who are making comfortable amounts of money but are of a less-educated social group where shopping and dressing up your kids and everything is a big deal. In addition to their toddlers wearing $100 Ugg boots and riding in $1000 stroller, having birthday parties at Chuck E Cheese or Coco Key are also a big thing. Same group of people who regularly go to Aruba but haven't otherwise been outside of Massachusetts.

My sister lives in a small, extremely affluent, low key town out near Wellesley. Wellesley is a few of miles away but it seems like a different world. If my sister's town is LL Bean, Wellesley is Dior. My sister's town is a Volvo. Wellesley is a Mercedes.

I predict that this new magazine is going to sell like macarons in Wellesley.

That would have been a good question - 100 years ago.