Dominican amputee admits trying to smuggle cocaine inside her wheelchair's batteries
A Dominican woman pleaded guilty today to a drug-smuggling charge in federal court - admitting she used the batteries of her motorized wheelchair to try to smuggle nearly five kilograms of cocaine through Logan Airport.
Ireline Aponte Melende, 30, arrived at Logan on a JetBlue flight from the Dominican Republic on May 15 with a dead wheelchair. She told customs officers her wheelchair's batteries had died, but a suspicious customs officer had the wheelchair and its two batteries X-rayed - which revealed "an abnormality" in both, according to an affidavit by a Homeland Security agent filed in US District Court in Boston:
Each battery was opened revealing two (2) bricks contained in each battery (four (4) bricks total). The bricks contained a white powdery substance. One brick was field tested using NarcoPouch 904B, and it tested positive for cocaine.
She's scheduled for sentencing on March 2, 2016 and faces up to 20 years in federal prison.
Ad:
Comments
was she an illegal?
Maybe Trump is right all along!
No
She came on a tourist visa. Maybe Trump was a fascist blowhard all along!
Trump is as extreme blow hard
Trump is as extreme blow hard. But I bet you wouldn't say the same thing about Bernie sanders.
You're right
Because Sanders is not an extremist blowhard.
I think "Deport Everyone" is
I think "Deport Everyone" is as crazy as "Everything will be free".
Not sure who said "everything will be free"
It sure as hell wasn't Bernie Sanders.
Nice propagandistic blather you got there.
nonpartisan analysts
said his platform would double the deficit, which has already doubled in the last 7 years. Always nice to hear progressives accuse OTHERS of propaganda and talking points. Yikes.
Not quite
Actually, the deficit, which is by definition a yearly measure, has been shrinking quite significantly for years and is now about 40% of what it was seven years ago.
There's plenty of articles out there to this effect:
I suspect you are probably talking about the National debt, which has increased, and will continue to do so regardless of what administrative policies are implemented in the next few years - that's compound interest biting us in the ass. (All those aging over-entitled boomers won't help the situation either.)
Although I'm fairly skeptical about Bernie's rhetoric myself, it's not clear to me from a bit of googling who these 'independent' analysts are, so a link or two would be helpful.
Lesson for TSA critics
Remember this every time you get outraged after watxhing a news channel show "shocking coverage" of TSA agents "heartlessly" screening grandma, or a quadrapolegic in a wheelchair, or a sleepy toddler at an airport.
Grandma could -unfortunately- be a drug dealer or a terrorist. And even if she's really an innocent sweetheart, her grand-daughter could have slipped a few bricks of meth, or explosives, into grandmas walker, or carry-on bag.
She wasn't a terrorist
What would have been the harm, really, if she had managed to bring her stash in?
What would be the harm?
You obviously don't live in a neighborhood where drug buying and selling are common. Usually it's accompanied by a lot of other crime, violence and neighborhood disruption. It isn't just a case of a willing seller and willing buyer--there is a whole violent culture that accompanies it.
A culture that exists because
A culture that exists because the product is illegal. It's a direct result of prohibition.
not the lesson you think
TSA is unable to detect it's way out of a paper bag via the useless security theatre techniques they employ. Have you ever seen a TSA agent do anything more than wave a hand wand over a wheelchair? What are the odds that in this case they'd "randomly" decide to open a battery compartment?
It will eventually come out (as was the case with most BOS airport seizures) that the TSA was directly tipped off on where and who to search by one of the unacknowledged DEA intelligence units that specializes in no-warrant, pervasive surveillance. Because the methods would not survive judicial scrutiny the unit members have been trained to create plausible but fake evidence trails and hide their own involvement by having other law enforcement agencies be the public face of the arrest or seizure. These are the same law enforcement people that will drop all criminal charges instantly if there is even the smallest risk that their use of a stingray box would be revealed in open court.
I would maybe give the benefit of the doubt for a Trooper that "randomly" found something in luggage via a canine sweep but, c'mon -- the TSA? Really? Nobody is gonna believe that.
Not TSA
This was CBP. They are a little more intense.