Hey, there! Log in / Register

Landmark Lower Mills bar could be sold

Lawyers for the owners of the Lower Mills Pub on Dorchester Avenue are hoping the Boston Licensing Board gives them a couple months to unravel a tangled skein of legal issues left when longtime co-owner Nicholas Byrne died after a long illness five years ago, so that they can sell the bar to a prominent Boston restaurant operator.

At a hearing before the board today, attorneys for the Byrne family and co-owner Jeremiah Nash said they have settled a Suffolk Superior Court lawsuit Nash filed against the family and now want to settle other legal issues preventing the sale, which includes the fact that the bar has not legally had a manager since Byrne died in 2010 - and that it owes Boston roughly $80,000 in back property taxes dating to 2004.

The lawyers said that after Byrne died, without a will, the family just continued to operate the bar - without ever removing his name as manager from its annual license renewal applications to the board or that of Nash's as president of the corporation that technically owned the bar even though the state had dissolved it in 2007.

The board summoned the owners to a hearing today to determine just who owns the establishment after the matter had been "brought to the board's attention." Board Chairwoman Christine Pulgini declined to say how the board learned of the issue, but said "My problem is that someone's been operating that bar essentially illegally, so what do we do?"

The attorneys accused an unsuccessful bidder for the property of having ratted them out to the board in an attempt to scuttle the sale - for which they had hoped to get a purchase-and-sale agreement signed this week.

Nash's attorney, Joseph Brodigan, pleaded with the board to formally continue its hearing for eight weeks so that he and Byrne attorney Lawrence Feeney could resolve all the outstanding issues.

Brodigan said there's no harm to the public to let the bar continue to operate for another eight weeks, because the bar has been around for 35 years now with only minor transgressions on its record. Forcing it to shut now would jeopardize the sale, harming the Byrne family and unfairly hurting Nash, who, despite having a 50% interest in the bar, was not involved in its operation and so would be an innocent victim of all the legal issues, Brodigan said.

"If you suspend them, our sale is going down the drain," Feeney said. "A lot of people are going to suffer needlessly."

The board decides Thursday whether to continue its hearing for eight weeks.

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

Let me get this straight. One of the two bars in Lower Mills has essentially been illegal since 2007 and has back property taxes going to 2004 and this is just coming up to the board now, and is sort of allowed to work things out, but a Newbury Street place gets hauled in because some yenta had to much to drink one night and causes wine mayhem.

Class warfare by the Board plain and simple. A Dot local (with a lot of Milton guys bellied up to the bar) gets a pass, because, you know, wink wink. Somebody gets a pursed snatched and its all Jesus H Gawd In Heaven, Packy O'Connors flourished as an open gambling joint for years and no one cared about that.

Usually I side with the neighborhoods against the special people of the Back Bay, but this is silly. Stay World Classy Boston.

up
Voting closed 0

Just a little FYI - The Larry Feeney mentioned above just happens to be the husband of your Boston City Clerk, Maureen Feeney,

up
Voting closed 0

The evils of wine. The world spins better on rye and beer chasers. Lower Mills hasn't been the same since the beer barn moved out anyway.

up
Voting closed 0

How can a public place like this, that is clearly bringing in money, NOT PAY TAXES for 10 years and still be in business?

up
Voting closed 0

Probably involves having the right friends.

up
Voting closed 0