Hey, there! Log in / Register

Signal problems fixed, South Station lines back to normal

Word from Keolis came around 5:40 a.m.

Now about the problems on the Fitchburg and Lowell lines into North Station ...

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 
Free tagging: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

Back to Baker normal (barely useful, expect breakdowns and delays every day), or real normal (functional)?

up
Voting closed 0

That you find decades of mismanagement solely the governors fault, who has only been in office of a year!

Or you're just a troll who spews the same tiered shtick, guess what Baker isn't going anywhere, in fact as of today if he ran for re-election he'd win by a landslide!.

up
Voting closed 0

I keep hearing from you Bakerites that he's only been in office for a year so we shouldn't blame him for anything.
So please tell me when the clock starts ticking on his responsibility?
Thanks so much.

up
Voting closed 0

I agree the T has been underfunded and mismanaged since the 90s, going back to the Weld administration, of which Baker was a key finance person. He has been in power again 14 months now, when does he start having responsibility? He has cut service and cancelled future projects, fired the old director of the T (Scott) and put in his team and a panel he chose and directs to redo things have been working awhile now. And just because he is popular doesn't mean he should run the T into the ground, Trump is very popular (#1 in polls in this state). It doesn't make them correct on the issues, it means a majority of people in this state (and country) don't care about public transit anymore and are scared of immigrants. More cars and guns are increasingly what conservatives want. Doesn't mean LEADERS shouldn't lead.

up
Voting closed 0

The voters had, since the Weld administration, elected a Democrat as governor, surely the issues with funding the T would have been resolved.

If only, at some point since 1991, a Democrat had been governor. If only.

up
Voting closed 0

I like Baker and would vote for him again.

However, he has taken on the T as a major issue and so far he's failing miserably. Why? The system (including both highway and mass transit infrastructure) needs a major infusion of money to fix decades of neglect. With gas prices around $1.70, NOW is the time to double the gas tax. It's presently at 24¢. If it was raised to 48¢ and gas "jumped" to $1.94, it wouldn't harm anyone. (Except Barbara Anderson who would have a coronary and drop dead.)

up
Voting closed 0

I think we should have some sort of gas price target, with the a tax making up the difference between the market rate and the pump rate. That way we always get the disincentive effect even in times of low gas prices, we raise more revenue, and the tax decreases as gas prices increase to limit the effect of price spikes on household budgets.

Not sure exactly how you'd implement it to get the target price "right" and make sure that vendors don't just peg their prices to the target price (thereby capturing the surplus that should have gone to the govt), but that's for economists.

up
Voting closed 0

T fares should probably be doubled (and the sales tax revenue stream abandoned: the correlation between sales tax collections and T operating and capital needs is tenuous at best), and a $1/gallon state gas tax should be instituted (and tolls should probably move to variable congestion rates topping out at twice the current tolls, with minimum tolls being half what they are now).

But the state should in turn set a threshold of income which is considered reasonable for payments to the state for transportation (gas tax paid for a passenger-registered car, tolls, and transit) and allow payments up to that threshold to be deductible against income tax (thus effectively making the gas tax for personal use of Massachusetts residents $0.95/gallon, and reducing the T fare increase to 90% for Massachusetts residents), with the next $1,000 a year being a refundable tax credit. Fuel economy could be encouraged by limiting the gallons of gas you could claim to, say, 1/25th of the miles you drove (trackable by the RMV through the annual inspections: don't get your car inspected and you can't claim the gas tax). Politically, the appeal would be largely that roads and transit would be disproportionately paid for by out-of-staters.

At a 3% threshold, $30k income means you pay $855 of the first $1,900 in T fares, tolls, and state gas taxes (making the "doubling" of T fares actually a fare cut for you if you only use the T). For someone driving a 25 mpg average (thus $0.04/mile in state gas taxes), that would amount to paying $855 for the first 47,500 miles driven (or an effective gas tax of $0.45/gallon).

up
Voting closed 0

Highest approval rating in the country of any governor, that Baker?

up
Voting closed 0

Yes, he still has to do his job, he cant just stand there like Trump and rail against refugees, he actually has to govern. Just saying he "wants to strangle someone" doesn't do anything except PR, unless he strangles himself, which would go a long way to improving the T, or at least bringing it back to where it was before he began his slash and burn campaign against it.

up
Voting closed 0

Baker: 74%

Nikki Haley of South Carolina: 81%

I only know this because she was on my tee vee this week.

up
Voting closed 0

Back to the "normal" it's been for the past several years, meaning "Deval Patrick" normal would be just as appropriate a moniker.

up
Voting closed 0