Hey, there! Log in / Register

MIT plan could save BPS money on bus routes, in part by laying off drivers

NBC Boston reports BPS is looking at a plan developed by MIT professors and students as part of a "transportation challenge" run by the school system.

Neighborhoods: 
Free tagging: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

This more than replaces the income generated by the Winthrop Tower so we don't have to build it so high. Let's just use this money instead of selling our soul to the highest bidder.

up
Voting closed 0

Is "our soul"?

up
Voting closed 0

But Boston Common is!

up
Voting closed 0

So it is ok for junkies to trash the common but god forbid a building casts a shadow on it for two hours a day in the winter.

up
Voting closed 0

Sure. Whatever.

Non-sequitur much or just an axe to grind?

up
Voting closed 0

Get rid of busing and let kids walk to a nearby school. Boom, millions saved.

up
Voting closed 0

And the millions spent each year on busing can be spent on schools, teachers, supplies, etc.

up
Voting closed 0

let rich kids only interact with rich kids and the poor kids only ever interact with poor kids. Why would we want to prepare kids for ever leaving their bubbles? Their parents are clearly too scared to.

up
Voting closed 0

not that i disagree with you, but this is precisely the way it is now. BPS is segregated by ethnicity and economic status from the surrounding school districts and within.

up
Voting closed 0

As in the ones who don't go to BPS and attend private schools? Most families with the means avoid BPS less the exam schools.

up
Voting closed 0

You then go on to talk about life preparation! Life isn't fair in the slightest bit.

What about METCO, it's that "fair?"

up
Voting closed 0

The fact is, Metco is a two-way street. Minority Boston kids get a chance at a different education, AND, here comes the important part, mostly white, upper-class white kids get to go to school with kids who are not like them.

up
Voting closed 0

How can you support Metco but oppose charter schools? Just like charter schools, Metco also siphons away the brightest students and dollars from BPS to suburban communities.

About the outcomes of Metco programs, the graduation rates and college attainment of Metco students are higher than their counterparts in BPS. However, we do not know how much of that is due to higher caliber students and how much of that is due to better schools.

In addition, the diversity goals of Metco program have been illusive. See the article in Boston Globe.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2017/07/23/half-century-later-diversit...

Better and fairer system compared to Metco would be to build a couple of new magnet schools in Boston so that the brighter students and $$ stay in BPS. In addition, the students would not have to wake up at 5 am to be shipped to distant suburban schools that will not embrace you.

If the suburban towns want diversity in their schools, they should encourage affordable housing instead of NIMBYsm.

up
Voting closed 0

We know the kids will be going to good schools. Way more of a crap shoot with charters.

up
Voting closed 0

there are very few "rich kids" in the system at all these days. I hear you on not wanting to increase segregation in the schools but the fact is that it happens already to such a huge degree that I honestly think a refocus on neighborhood schools will help rather than hurt. The unpredictability of where your kids are going to go is unsettling for all parents and having their school all the way across the city makes getting involved and committed that much harder. The money spent in busing is a whole other issue, but I'd rather see the focus and the $ put on strengthening schools in ALL neighborhoods.

up
Voting closed 0

But it was precisely because the courts determined that the Boston School Committee could not be trusted to allocate resources equitably in all neighborhoods that busing was put in place. Garrity concluded that there was a history going back at least 20 years of a concerted effort to segregate the schools and to fund them unequally. That was more than forty years ago, and maybe things have changed, but the arguments you're making now were made then, though perhaps with less pure motives. I think abandoning busing without addressing the question of why it was necessary in the first place would risk a return to a time when the black students of Boston could walk to neighborhhood schools that weren't worth attending.

up
Voting closed 0

risk a return to a time when the black students of Boston could walk to neighborhood schools that weren't worth attending.

Vs. now where taxpayers pay a lot of money to bus them to schools that aren't worth attending.

up
Voting closed 0

it is pretty well established that before desegregation some schools were a lot better than others. More money per pupil, smaller classes. etc. Are you saying that the effect of desegregation has been to make them all equally bad, without improving any of them?

up
Voting closed 0

Has been to increase segregation.

up
Voting closed 0

that the entire city will benefit from growth and progress. Schools are where people meet, friendships grow and ownership of community start. Go to any suburb and you'll find the local school that has parents that become active in the community because of the local school. Local schools are the conduit to community participation.

What is disturbing to me, is progressives that decry all forms of discrimination, don't believe minority parents are capable of having the same cause and effect on community through local schools. Fear of re-segragation. What do we have now? How can a single mother with three kids in three different Boston Public Schools, in three different neighborhoods become involved? She can't, but why change something that isn't working when you can just change a bus route.

up
Voting closed 0

How can a single mother with three kids in three different Boston Public Schools, in three different neighborhoods become involved?

My wife and I both travel for work, and have a young child in school and a younger child pre-school. When one parent goes away for a M-F trip, the other barely treads water -- and that's with the weekend before spent doing laundry, cooking, and prepping for the week, and with relatively flexible working schedules and enough money to buy out of problems.

A single mother with three kids? She's not going to be involved much in anything outside work and home even if her three kids all go to the same school.

up
Voting closed 0

my point. I guess I'd rather be hyperbolic than out of touch with reality.

That single mother travels for work too. On the bus. Doesn't drive a BMW or sip latte in the South end between working mothers group get togethers, dog walking or yoga. Oh, and work....

up
Voting closed 0

Whoa, hold on there.
As a single mother, you'd be surprised what we can do. School involvement? Of course!

Don't cut us off at the knees because of your preconceptions.

up
Voting closed 0

Great point. Schools are not factories where kids can be shipped to different schools, receive grades and graduate. Schools are about friendship, community, neighborhoods, and learning.

Given the dollar amount spent per student and the outcomes (graduation, etc), the current BPS system is a failure. Many of the suburbs spend similar dollar per student but are able to achieve much higher outcomes. There was a reason why we needed to bus students sixty years ago. However, a lot has changed since then including technology, demographics, economy, job market, etc. At the least, there needs to be a study on whether the current system was able to achieve its goals and whether it will best serve the students going forward.

up
Voting closed 0

Why are you comparing BPS with suburban districts? Do you actually think that is a fair comparison? Boston is widely regarded as one of the best urban school districts in the country! Educate yourself before you spread lies!

up
Voting closed 0

Kids spending so much time everyday being bused and waiting for bus is an enormous waste of time in addition to money. Also, talk about pollution and traffic caused by transporting students to far away schools. These kids should be learning new skills, engaged in arts and music or playing sports instead of sitting in the traffic.

up
Voting closed 0

This is Boston, not LA. Nobody's spending hours on a bus, we're not that big a city.

up
Voting closed 0

up
Voting closed 0

Who go to Dexter or Roxbury Latin also have to sit on busses....

up
Voting closed 0

One of my neighbor's kids went to an out-of-town school through Metco and had to be at her bus stop in Hyde Park at some ungodly hour. But I was talking about BPS schools; most Boston kids are not in Metco.

up
Voting closed 0

This is Boston, fuck LA!

up
Voting closed 0

You can still spend more than an hour on a bus to get from one end of the city to the other.

Though I have no idea how many kids live in Hyde Park and go to school in Orient Heights.

up
Voting closed 0

But at least at the elementary and middle-school levels, that doesn't happen. No kid from Hyde Park is going to be assigned to a school in Charlestown. It's different at the high school level, but there's an element of choice there - a kid in Charlestown would likely have to choose to go to school in Hyde Park (and then he'd have to figure out how to get there on the T).

up
Voting closed 0

And kids wouldn't be so obese if they were allowed to walk to school. But fear mongering has caused society to deem it unacceptable to let your kid walk somewhere even though violent crime has been decreasing in this country for decades.

up
Voting closed 0

I wondered what would have happened if Tito Jackson said he was going to end busing in Boston. I think that might get him elected. Even if it were impossible for a mayor to do, I'm somewhat surprised he doesn't even throw it out there. Instead (because the city just got the police contract done without anyone even noticing once Tito announced his intent to run) Tito has to use platforms that I don't really think he believes in....

up
Voting closed 0

For starters, some neighborhoods just don't have enough seats in their local schools. Ask West Roxbury.

Boston also has a ton of specialized programs (think special education and programs for non-English-speakers) that just cannot be offered at every single school in the system. Those kids need buses.

And let's not forget that BPS is legally required to provide school-bus service for charter schools, all of which are open citywide.

So no matter what BPS does, it has to provide buses - and I'm going to bet you the cost of busing the remaining kids (and remember - BPS is now buying CharlieCards starting in seventh grade) would be far, far less than building the new schools/classrooms that would be needed to get all those BPS kids off buses.

up
Voting closed 0

It isn't safe for kids to walk when shoveling requirements aren't enforced, when sidewalks are not maintained or do not exist, and when drivers aren't ticketed frequently for ignoring crosswalks and speed limits.

See Also: kids hit when state/city did not bother to clear public walkways.

The fear of the boogyman snatching kids is largely irrational and statistically miniscule, but the fear of letting kids navigate questionable walking conditions and deal with insane drivers is real.

up
Voting closed 0

You'd be surprised how many BPS students walk at least part of their trip to school, be it the middle and high school kids that take the T or the elementary school kids that walk to their bus stop.

But hey, the next time there is snowfall, feel free to hop in your Subaru and track down the unshoveled sidewalks in the big bad city. There is even an app you can use to document violations.

up
Voting closed 0

Now, please point out where I said that NO students walk to school at all? Because, frankly dude who lives and works further from City Hall than I do, I never said that.

I merely pointed out the reason that many PARENTS won't ALLOW their kids to walk.

There are other reasons that are true in most cities, such as not living within walking distance of a school because of the systematic closure of neighborhood schools.

BTW: Medford isn't a suburb - it is a city. Learn your history, please.

up
Voting closed 0

You live in one of the municipalities outside of the main city that happens to have the city form of government.

And as one who walks the actual sidewalks that Boston school children walk and do it even when there is 4 feet of snow out there, I assure you that Boston sidewalks are probably better cared for than the sidewalks of Medford, Melrose, Woburn, and all the other "cities" whose residents know what's best for Boston.

How many BPS students live on your block?

up
Voting closed 0

Sometimes Swirly seems rational, but this chip she has on her shoulder about living in a suburb is too funny.

up
Voting closed 0

How coukd anyone who lives so far from city hall possibly understand Boston better than someone who lives in say Somerville Cambridge or Meffah. Nobody from Hyde Park ciuld ever be qualified to understand the city to be, ohh, say mayor. Someone from there would make a terrible mayor and never get elected, much less re-elected should they rise to power accidentally thru the city council presidency.

up
Voting closed 0

If Beacon Hill just let everyone from the greater Boston area vote for mayor of Boston without letting their municipalities be annexed, we wouldn't have to worry about people from Hyde Park or Dorchester being elected mayor. We would have been lucky and got someone like Michael McGlynn.

up
Voting closed 0

for those along the commuter rail route when this Comm. Ave project goes down this week because the MBTA buses would cost too much....

(I'm sure there are more details than what I'm giving)

up
Voting closed 0

Given the number of riders on that line it seems possible if not likely that the MBTA doesn't have enough busses and drivers available. Even if they have the available vehicles you can't just bring in outside drivers.

up
Voting closed 0

Wait, isn't it just a small portion of the line from Blandford to Babcock? That could be done easily with 4-8 MBTA busses in a loop and they would come even more frequently than the train does.

up
Voting closed 0

They said commuter rail, not green line... sure, you could maybe handle the B line busing with just a handful of buses, but that becomes a lot harder once you include Worcester line passengers.

up
Voting closed 0

You should always live in the town you work in.

up
Voting closed 0

is just between Boston Landing (New Balance) and Reservoir station. It's not the whole rail line. It's also only on Saturday and Sunday, 7/29 - 7/30 & 8/5 - 8/6 .

up
Voting closed 0

I never said it was for the whole rail line. But you still have to handle the whole rail line's passengers.

up
Voting closed 0

I don't think the "in part by laying off drivers" lament is going to make anybody blink an eye, as long as the new bus routes are faster than the old ones.

up
Voting closed 0

not one comment so far about the drivers that will be out of jobs.

up
Voting closed 0

The BPS isn't a jobs program.

up
Voting closed 0

One simple solution would be to allow Boston school buses to pull into JFK, Ashmont and Forest Hills stations to drop off the kids safely instead of dropping kids off in the middle of the street causing traffic jams risking kids lives as they have to dodge oncoming cars. Other schools such as Catholic schools such as CM, and colleges such as U-Mass Boston and Curry College are allowed to utilized the bus ways to drop off and pick up students which raises the question of why the BPS Buses are banned from the MBTA stations?

up
Voting closed 0

BPS buses are banned from making pickups at MBTA stations? Never heard that before.

up
Voting closed 0

MBTA bus ways are excluded ways and any vehicle not authorized is subject to towing and ticketing by the Transit Police. For some reason Boston school buses are not authorized to utilize the bus ways.

up
Voting closed 0

Technically any bus besides MBTA buses is banned from the busways.

This is something the T has studied before, but unsurprisingly, nothing came of it. I remember a study regarding letting the MASCO buses use the busway at Ruggles showed something like a 6 second increase in average delay getting buses through or something trivial like that.

I think the T is over-restrictive about busways in general. Any bus belonging to a governmental or semi-governmental entity should be allowed to use them.

And then of course there's idiotic things like posting the standard busway do not enter signs at the entrance to the parking lot at Sullivan... there is no legal way to enter that parking lot, since both entrances are signed as busways.

up
Voting closed 0

Brockton Area Transit buses use the Ashmont station busway, and the (private) Go Bus to New York City uses the busway in Alewife station. And of course the UMass shuttle bus uses the JFK/UMass busway.

up
Voting closed 0

Now that I think about it, I seem to recall seeing MASCO buses in the JFK busway as well...

Maybe it boils down to other entities having to pay for access at specific stations? I'm genuinely curious if anyone knows the actual answer to this.

up
Voting closed 0