Hey, there! Log in / Register
Did the Herald blow Martha Coakley's response to an inane question completely out of context?
By adamg on Mon, 10/26/2009 - 1:27pm
At Blue Mass. Group, David Kravits makes the case. At issue: What Coakley said in response to some question by Janet Wu on Channel 5's new political show. Speaking of which, KennedySeat.com wonders when the adults will show up on the show:
... In the three episodes of this show I have watched (I skipped Christy), I have continually been struck by how the guests just run circles around the hosts, who are clearly overmatched. Even Pagliuca, who is a neophyte in the political world, handled the Channel 5 team easily. ...
Topics:
Ad:
Support Universal Hub
Help keep Universal Hub going. If you like what we're up to and want to help out, please consider a (completely non-deductible) contribution.
Comments
did they think that
conflating a Tina Fey skit into a Palin gaff would be done only once? Don't complain about the water after you have peed in the well.
Boo Hoo Mass Group
They can come back and cry some more later if Coakley loses and 87% of the winning candidate's voters think that she said something that she didn't actually say.
Not Ready for prime time
Coakley on experience: I know some state legislators
Coakley on diversity: I have black friends
Coakley on victim rights: I've victimized lots of people using the law!
In the context of the
In the context of the question asked, Coakley's answer makes complete sense.
Herald's hit squad after Coakley
The Herald has it in for Martha Coakley- besides calling her the "Ice Queen" and the "mean girl" this morning's front page pathetically compared Martha's answer on foreign travel to Sarah Palin's.
Shame on them- how embarrassing to attempt a political hit without realizing that many of their readers who truly like Palin won't get the point and see it as a positive- tee hee hee-
Dumb and dumber
Ahhh. the Notorious Herald
Ahhh. the Notorious Herald Hit Squad! Hide the children!