Hey, there! Log in / Register

Felony charge reinstated against Boston cop accused of attacking family member

A Dorchester Municipal Court judge today reinstated a felony charge of assault and battery with a dangerous weapon - pavement - against BPD Officer Alexis Herrera-Brea, who now faces arraignment on June 30, the Suffolk County District Attorney's office reports.

Judge Paul Tressler had initially dismissed the charge based on a motion by Herrera-Brea's attorney, Benjamin Megrian, that pavement was not considered a "dangerous weapon" under Massachusetts law. Although an appeals court ruled that way, that decision was then overturned several months later by the Supreme Judicial Court.

According to the DA's office:

In his ruling, Judge Paul Tressler stated that “[t]he court relied on erroneous misrepresentations” in allowing a handwritten motion to dismiss that was filed by Officer Herrera-Brea’s private defense attorney at the officer’s original arraignment date on June 8, 2021. Upon realizing the error prior to outside inquiry, Suffolk prosecutors swiftly filed a motion to reconsider, which was argued before Judge Tressler earlier today. Judge Tressler issued his handwritten findings allowing the Commonwealth’s motion late this afternoon thus reinstating the complaint and then scheduling the arraignment.

Herrera-Brea was already on probation on an earlier domestic-violence charge, when he was arrested on the new charge, the DA's office says. Boston Police placed him on administrative leave after his arrest.

Innocent, etc.

Topics: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

I didn't understand. Who is an incompetent here, a judge or a DA?

up
Voting closed 0

... for doing something that was a very not-good thing. Presenting a motion that does not correctly state the law (but instead is unmistakably wrong) is a good way to get into big trouble. Not only does it do harm in the case involved, it damages your credibility in subsequent cases before that judge (and other judges who hear about what happened).

up
Voting closed 0

It's a good thing nobody judges the credibility of a judge who grants a "unmistakably wrong" motion.

Or a DA who makes a felony charge without writing down a section number of the applicable law for the arraignment.

up
Voting closed 0

The attorney apparently failed to find a subsequent decision, overturning the ruling upon which his motion was based. Very doubtful that it was a case of misrepresentation. Handwritten motion in the courthouse was probably based on quick research done on a cell phone, and not accessing the proper database. There should have been a timeout to get it straight. The judge made that call.

up
Voting closed 0

As a retired attorney I feel that is a worse-than-rookie mistake. If it was not deliberate misrepresentation it was inexcusable negligence/carelessness.

up
Voting closed 0