Hey, there! Log in / Register

Man who served time for crime he was ultimately acquitted of sues state

A man whose conviction for lying to police about a 2011 murder in the parking lot of a Jamaica Plain convenience store was overturned by the Supreme Judicial Court today sued the state for what he says his trial, conviction and time in a Suffolk County jail has done to him.

On Oct. 16, 2011, Christopher Rivera, an O'Bryant School graduate just months from graduating with a degree in social work from Bridgewater State University, was out with a friend when they stopped at the 7-Eleven at South Huntington Avenue and Centre Street. An argument between the friend and somebody in the car next to them turned into a fight in which Rivera's friend, Hector Soto, fatally stabbed the other man.

Later, when police interviewed Rivera, he told them he was at a party in Hyde Park, rather than at the 7-Eleven at the time of the stabbing, after which they charged him as an accessory after the fact. In 2013, he was jointly tried with Soto - who was charged with second-degree murder - and convicted, after which a judge sentenced him to 2 1/2 years in jail, with a year to actually serve. Soto was also convicted and sentenced to life. The jury acquitted Rivera of a separate assault-and-battery charge related to the fight.

In 2019, however, the Supreme Judicial Court overturned Rivera's conviction - after he had already served his time - concluding that state law required prosecutors to show Rivera's statements somehow changed the course of the police investigation, which they hadn't, since police quickly targeted Soto as the killer and nothing Rivera said made them or tried to make them think differently. The court then sent his case back to Suffolk Superior Court with an order to formally acquit Rivera, which a judge did.

In his complaint, filed today in Suffolk Superior Court under the state's wrongful-conviction law, Rivera said he never should have been tried, let alone convicted and put in jail, and that he is owed damages for those acts and for the harm all that caused him.

Rivera says that his goal had to become a social worker - at Bridgewater State he worked with programs for troubled youth - but he no longer could, first because Bridgewater State expelled him, despite the fact he had yet to even go to trial. Then, he was released from his sentence, nobody would touch him for a social-work field - even after the school relented and mailed him a diploma in 2012, because he had completed all his coursework on his own with the help of his professors before his trial.

Finally, almost ten years after he was arrested, his complaint continues, Rivera was able to get a job as a social worker associate with "a major Boston-based organization."

Put differently, the wrongful conviction and incarceration have significantly damaged Mr. Rivera by, not least of which, delaying his social-work career for nearly a decade.

Rivera is seeking damages equal to the roughly ten years of earnings he might have otherwise made as a social worker, plus damages for having to go to trial to begin with and for spending time behind bars for a crime the state's highest court said he did not commit.

Neighborhoods: 
Free tagging: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon Complete complaint457.41 KB


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

He lied to the cops about being at the scene of a murder, and now says he is the victim in this?

Maybe had he told the truth he would not be in this shit.

up
Voting closed 0

He is a victim precisely for the reasons the Supreme Judicial Court decision implied: he should never have been convicted, and he should never have served time. That he did means he lost a year of his life in prison (probably more with parole), and a decade of his earning potential in a career he was ready to enter. His lying to the cops is immaterial. It literally has nothing to do anything.

He is "in this shit" because he was wrongfully charged and convicted. That sounds like a victim to me.

up
Voting closed 0

He didn’t commit a crime, but got thrown in prison anyway because the state didn’t like that he lied. He is a victim. It is true that lying to cops is a bad idea but it is not illegal unless you’re actually obstructing justice or are sworn under oath. Neither applies here. He didn’t lie about anything material to the investigation.

This wouldn’t be difficult if you sincerely cared about constitutional rights. Unfortunately far too many Americans have a “lock ‘em up, even if they didn’t commit a crime” mentality. People like you are exactly why the US had the world’s highest incarceration rate.

up
Voting closed 0

When do the police start being incarcerated for lying? Lying that they are trained to do in court?

I'll wait ...

up
Voting closed 0

We need more social workers, especially competent and committed social workers, as he seems to have been working to become, despite being incarcerated.

up
Voting closed 0

up
Voting closed 0

There is a lot of benefit for people to speak tkk on the police- like reporting crimes, day, like reporting the murder your friend just committed, rather than lie about it.
The stop snitchin’ attitude and refusal of many to report crimes or stand as witnesses is part the reason a lot of sinister things continue- in neighborhoods, families, businesses, etc.

up
Voting closed 0

it sounds like the judge agreed that a smart person ended up in a bad situation and made a dumb mistake.

S#it Happens, right?

But to award monetary penalties to someone for their mistake is what's interesting to me.

If this guy ends up receiving a settlement it's because the cops screwed up bad.

Yet another reason to never talk to cops. No matter your complexion, they're not your friends.

up
Voting closed 0