By adamg on Sun., 1/12/2025 - 9:28 am
The Herald reports Councilor Ed Flynn has concluded he can't raise enough money to take on incumbent Michelle Wu, so will instead run for re-election this year.
Topics:
Neighborhoods:
Free tagging:
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
Instead, he'll run for
By deselby
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 9:48am
Registrar of Deeds whenever Murph decides to retire.
Uh, retire?
By 02132
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 11:49am
She lost the election.
the reference is to the current Register, Stephen J. Murphy
By anon
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 12:40pm
another former Boston City Councilor, who was swept into office by the resignation of another councilor, after placing fifth in the election. Despite having stellar hack credentials, Murph has run the Registry quite well, and if he stays to age 90, he will have the support of the professionals who use the Registry. Murph's performance is a stark contrast to the Arroyo crime family's destruction of the Probate Registry upstairs. The long term employees of those government/court administrative offices typically have real mastery of their subject matter, and things work best when their knowledge and opinions are consulted and valued.
Steve Murphy would have been a good mayor
By deselby
Mon, 01/13/2025 - 8:41am
unlike Ed Flynn. Or Ray Flynn for that matter.
It just wasn't in the stars for Steve though. So much of Boston municipal politics is luck.
Disappointing
By eddie van halen
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 10:21am
Disappointing
Yeah
By SwirlyGrrl
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 2:44pm
Would have been great fun to see Wu hand him his ass.
It would have been nice…
By Anon
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 4:17pm
It would have been nice to have someone at least make her work for it and answer questions regarding her vision and policy. He most likely would have been demolished but for as much of a meatball he is, he was spot on regarding the property tax issue and white stadium. He would have e made her work to be reelected and that is never a bag thing.
Whatever pleases Boston's
By eddie van halen
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 4:26pm
Whatever pleases Boston's adult children. But something tells me most of you don't even live within the city boundaries.
If a Flynn can't attract enough donors in Boston...
By CopleyScott17
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 10:43am
...big money has decided Mayor Wu is unbeatable or he is unelectable. Unless they're holding out for Althea.
“Big moneyâ€
By dan r
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 11:03am
Please
Flynn can’t attract enough
By Anon
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 11:06am
Flynn can’t attract enough donors even as a political nepobaby because “let’s go back to the 50s†isn’t resonating with a lot of Boston.
“Go back to the 50s†?
By anon
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 11:32am
“Go back to the 50s†?
And what does that even mean
He has his townie supporters, but not enough overall.
By Section77
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 11:39am
He can pen him-self in as councillor at large for the next ten years.
Like neighboring cities ...
By SwirlyGrrl
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 2:46pm
The provincial olds still think they own the city but are an extremely vocal minority. They mistake the Greek Chorus noises made by their friends who moved to Wilmington or Marshfield long ago with having actual political relevance.
They can't even do math well enough to understand their relegation to entertainment.
You Mean Like Medford People?
By John Costello
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 4:15pm
Like those people who think they live in Boston?
Yes
By eddie van halen
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 9:02pm
Provincial old so-called "progressives" who live outside the city.
Hi there!
By SwirlyGrrl
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 9:34pm
The Man from Marshfield has entered the chat ...
Medford is going through the same thing - one city councilor representing the "old towne" and pretending to be persecuted/claiming voter fraud despite a nonpartisan recount, with some very noisy social media supporters (including expat neoplandords) who claim to represent far more people than have bothered to vote for their candidates. They predicted a landslide "now that people are paying attention", but failed to muster sufficient votes against the prop 2.5 overrides.
It qualifies as circus entertainment wherever it happens.
I live closer to Boston City Hall than many in Boston do - and also spend a fair amount of time in Boston proper. What goes on in Boston does impact my quality of life.
I Had A Friend
By John Costello
Mon, 01/13/2025 - 9:57am
He died at a too young an age from cancer.
He once said he lived "Near Duxbury". I told him that mean he lived in Pembroke.
Saying you live close to Boston City Hall is than many other Bostonians doesn't matter. You live in Meffa. Not the City of Boston.
I too spend a lot of time in Boston and unlike your trailer park raised self actually lived in Boston from birth until I was in my 30's. I still work in Boston and have had a job downtown since I was 16. I've lived in Dot, Southie, and the South End.
I also went to BPS. My Mom still lives in the City of Boston. Not Medford.
What goes on in Boston does impact my quality of life.
If you want to keep one upping, I can go all day honey. Just remember, you are from Oregon, not Boston.
Or
By MyManMyMelo
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 12:37pm
Its 2025 and nobody gives a damn about “a Flynnâ€
Right.
By CopleyScott17
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 12:58pm
Which is pretty remarkable progress.
I was born in 1994
By MyManMyMelo
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 9:24pm
I never knew the Boston Garden.
I never watched cheers.
I never saw Larry Bird play.
I never knew the Patriots as a joke.
My first year watching baseball, the Red Sox won the World Series.
honestly? very unremarkable to me.
And many born in the 1990s and 2000s.
You have plenty of company
By SwirlyGrrl
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 9:39pm
The median age of Boston residents is 32.6 years old (2020).
The shifting age structure of the city - and increased voting among younger people - explains a lot about the shifting political scene.
SOURCE
ETA: I checked ACS data for 2024 and this median is still about right
33.7
By MyManMyMelo
Mon, 01/13/2025 - 1:27pm
Yep.
Median Age in 2023 was 33.7 So 1989/1990 birth. These are people who do not remember the things I wasn't born for. Granted, I'm sure the median age of a voter is 40-45. But a lot of what older folks see as revolutionary change I just kind of assumed would happen by looking around at my peers or took for granted. Its a good thing.
Source: https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST1Y2023.S0101?q=...
I never knew the Patriots as
By Rob
Mon, 01/13/2025 - 8:49am
They're making up for lost time these past few years.
" In Rod we Rust"
By Allstonpete
Mon, 01/13/2025 - 12:15pm
" In Rod we Rust"
Of course there’s no money
By Frelmont
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 11:42am
Of course there’s no money for Flynn. The Democratic Party has an identity crisis. We Democrats need to get our house in order. We need to get back to the basics of leveling the playing field by fully supporting unions and end the self-denying pandering to far-left socialist third parties.
Big money is happy to give to the Democratic Party so that they may break it. The Party is divided and conquered. There’s a continuum of views in the Democratic Party from left to right, but it is a proven folly that we can gain electoral margins by straining the seams of our tent by harboring and co-opting Social Democrats and other Socialists where the majority of Democrats suppress the motivated self-interest - chiefly economic interests, but also the existential interests eg.: good stewardship of growth - and herein lies the impasse: are we Democrats, or Socialists (always, inexorably, proto-communists?)
The scales have fallen, the spell is broken and America has spoken, let’s get our house back in order so we may hold on to the wealth we work so hard to generate and let the Socialist-Progressives take care of their own Party.
Yo Bedbug
By SwirlyGrrl
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 2:51pm
AI comment detected.
“I am not an animal! I am a
By Frelmont
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 5:44pm
“I am not an animal! I am a human being! I am a man!†-Treves, or De Vore, or Bergren
I am too unhip to understand if calling people “AI†is a slur, an ad hominem, or jocularity. If you prick me…I bleed.
Great! Now I need to look up “bedbug†in this context.
"Far left"? "Socialist"?
By necturus
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 3:26pm
There is no left in this country, and that's part of the problem. People put labels like "socialist" on CULTURAL ideas they don't like, but real socialism is the idea that the interests of the community should take precedence over the interests of rich individuals or private corporations.
And that's exactly what Democrats should stand for. They can't though, because they depend on rich people's money to win elections.
As I said elsewhere, politics in this country are profoundly corrupt, perhaps irredeemably so.
And Dem Pols
By eddie van halen
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 4:30pm
like Biden, and the millionaire "socialists" who live in Boston, require corporations and capitalism to maintain their lifestyles.
I mean, maybe, but...
By Pete X
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 5:57pm
Corporations and capitalism require "socialists" in government to keep the market fair and to keep the country educated and safe enough to provide a fertile ground for "capitalism".
Otherwise you get the criminal autocracy we're headed for, where a few billionaires like Elon Musk buy Republican Pols, who wreck our education, health and social support system and lead the country down the road to economic ruin and violent division.
This implies that only socialists...
By eddie van halen
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 7:41pm
subscribe to education, government services and ethical behavior. False and laughable. In case you haven't noticed, we're already being controlled by a globalist autocracy and technocracy. We're not "heading" there. They aren't all pure capitalists, and they don't just buy Republicans. But by all means, enjoy that binary worldview.
Name one millionaire socialist in Boston
By dan r
Mon, 01/13/2025 - 9:02am
Go ahead
Name one?
By eddie van halen
Wed, 01/15/2025 - 9:57pm
I don't NAME random people on a blog. But, to start with, almost anyone who owns ANY type of real estate bigger than a 1-2 BR condo in most Boston neighborhoods is a millionaire by default, based on the value of said real estate. MANY of them are socialists. JP alone is filled with millionaire socialists. Some of them even rent said property at top dollar market rate rents. Those are just the people whose assets are obvious based on what they openly own. It's pretty comical that that needs to be explained to you.
Landlords Renting at "Top Dollar" are not socialists.
By Pete X
Thu, 01/16/2025 - 9:25am
It's pretty comical that that needs to be explained to you
They aren't the tenants renting at top dollar...
By eddie van halen
Thu, 01/16/2025 - 3:52pm
they are the property owners renting to tenants at top dollar. I said property owners renting SAID property. And yes, many are socialists in ideology. Bernie Sanders is a socialist. Boston has many wealthy people who advocate socialism. If you haven't met any of them you need to get out more.
Landlords Renting at Top Dollar are Not Socialists
By Pete X
Fri, 01/17/2025 - 8:54am
No matter what label they apply to themselves, they're capitalists. Just like MAGAs who call themselves "conservatives" are not conservative, they're radical nazis.
No matter what you say about them...
By eddie van halen
Fri, 01/17/2025 - 12:30pm
you don't define their political ideology, what they support, and who they vote for. They do. Using your logic only people who live under socialism and live a purely socialist life can be socialists. Only those who are active in the Democratic party can be Democrats-- all nonsense.
Furthermore, MAGA isn't a universally defined term nor do they all support Nazism, so that's just something else you fabricated. Just admit you're as hypocritical as the self-identified socialists who got wealthy from capitalism and now advocate socialism and move on. There's no way you back peddle on your absurdity at this point, although I'm sure you'll make another pathetic attempt at it. smh
That's a lot of words you've written
By Pete X
Fri, 01/17/2025 - 1:04pm
that add up to nothing.
Voting for one candidate one time that calls himself a socialist (Sanders- who still believes in well-regulated capitalism) does not make you a socialist, sorry Eddie.
Supporting a fascist makes you a fascist, though, that one's a no-brainer.
Sorry, Eddie.
Yup - as predicted...
By eddie van halen
Fri, 01/17/2025 - 1:08pm
another (really) pathetic attempt. I had high hopes that you'd do a little better than that. Never said anything about a socialist being a person who voted one time for a socialist - that you claim isn't one. Bernie is a self described democratic socialist who is wealthy. Who voted for him, specifically, is irrelevant to my point. One can be wealthy and still advocate socialism. This town is filled with them. Good day, strawman. I'll keep my eyes out for your regular banal contributions to this blog.
roflmfao
Mayors don't lose
By BostonDog
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 11:49am
Wu is generally well liked and the sitting mayor isn't going to be unseated without some major scandal that is squarely her fault. (White stadium isn't a scandal.)
She's moderated her positions so she's neither too liberal nor too conservative for all but the people on the edges of the political spectrum. These groups are far from the majority of voters.
Semi-liked.
By Frelmont
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 5:49pm
Semi-liked.
Actual data
By Kathode
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 6:09pm
from actual voters registered in Boston: https://commonwealthbeacon.org/by-the-numbers/wu-g...
So...
By lbb
Tue, 01/14/2025 - 9:36am
...you don't like her, but the mouse in your pocket does.
Yeah I think I know where you get your "data".
I'm not a fan of Ed Flynn, but...
By necturus
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 3:20pm
...it shouldn't be money that decides who the mayor of Boston will be.
Our politics in this country are profoundly corrupt, perhaps irredeemably so.
"Money"
By BostonDog
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 5:52pm
I agree with the sentiment but in this case Flynn is mostly admitting that if he couldn't even line up a few donors, he was just going to embarrass himself to continue further.
Some politicians can bank on grassroots support and don't need much cash to stand a chance. But Flynn had neither.
Which Mayor in recent history...
By eddie van halen
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 8:52pm
won with grassroots support against a sitting Mayor with a hefty war chest - not to mention the many donors she had from outside the state during her first run?
She raised over a million just for her inauguration in 22.
https://www.wbur.org/news/2022/06/30/boston-mayor-...
Which mayor replaced an incumbent?
By BostonDog
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 9:03pm
No incumbent mayor has been defeated in decades. You have to go back to 1950 when Curley was defeated. And Curley had spent time in jail during his last term. (Ignoring Janey since she was acting and only Mayor for a few months.)
Before the Mayorship was extended to 4 years from 2, turnover was more common. But that's more than 100 years ago.
If Kraft runs he'll have unlimited money so you can test the theory it's only money keeping Wu in office.
"it's (only) money keeping Wu in office"
By eddie van halen
Sun, 01/12/2025 - 9:50pm
is not my theory. But grassroots support won't be giving anyone a chance here.
"You have to go back to 1950 when Curley was defeated"
By tachometer
Mon, 01/13/2025 - 6:00pm
IIRC that wouldn't have even happened if Curley didn't make some denigrating wise-crack about Hynes who temporarily held the office when he was incarcerated. It basically pissed him off and the very motivated candidate managed to unseat the one with the criminal history.
Pages
Add comment