Mother found not guilty of most serious charges in gunshot death of Liquarry Jefferson, 8
A Suffolk Superior Court jury today acquitted Lakeisha Gadson of charges of involuntary manslaughter, reckless endangerment of a child, improper storage of a firearm and unlawful possession of a firearm, but did find her guilty of misleading a police officer following the death of her son in 2007.
Suffolk County prosecutors had charged Gadson - and another, older son - shared the blame for the death of Liquarry at the hands of a seven-year-old cousin as they played on June 24, 2007, because they stored the loaded gun in an unlocked dresser in the room where the two boys played. And, prosecutors charged, they lied repeatedly to investigating officers about the circumstances of Liquarry's death, initially blaming it on intruders in hoodies.
Her older son, Jayquan McConnico, pleaded guilty to manslaughter charges in 2008. A juvenile, he will be in DYS custody until he turns 21 in three years.
Ad:
Comments
The best defense to a violent
The best defense to a violent criminal charge is being a woman and a mother.
It was her 16 year-old son Jayquan McConnico's gun or was it?
Well which is it? Obtained or permitted? That seems like a ambiguous (flimsy) fact set to go to court with.
If she obtained and gave it to her 16 year old then the facts support an "involuntary manslaughter" charge - accidental killing of another person because of criminal or reckless negligence. If she didn't know he had it (didn't permit it) or even if she knew but had no power over him to secure it safely, then the charge was excessive. The jury agreed.
So much for the legal principle of
holding parents accountable for the actions of their minor children.
what are you talking about?
It's what she did or didn't do that determines if she is guilty, not what her son did or didn't do.
First, JAYQUAN, 16, pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter.
Then the DA went to court to prove the mom committed the same crime but as you can see (in their own words above) without knowing if she owned the weapon, her son owned it, or her son owned it and she did not secure it adequately. They failed to present that evidence because they did not have it. And that evidence is central to the question of her guilt.
During the investigation she lied about a phantom gang member being the perpetrator which goes to her credibility but it does not substitute for their lack of evidence. It is the responsibility of the investigators and DA to charge and prosecute on the basis of the evidence. It's what they can prove, not what they think.
They did not have the evidence to convict her of involuntary manslaughter. The court and the jury did its job.
(... still waiting for the DA's lapdog to show up here and post about the appeal.)