UPDATE: MBTA General Manager Beverly Scott said this afternoon the authority will seek federal disaster aid and that it could be 30 days - yes, 30 - before the T is fully operational again, but only if we don't have another blizzard.
The MBTA says service on the T will be about the same as today, MassDOT says: The Red Line will run between Alewife and Andrew, the Orange Line between Sullivan and Back Bay and the Green Line between Lechmere and Kenmore, except for the D branch, which will continue all the way to Riverside. The Blue Line will run all the way between Bowdoin and Wonderland.
On the Red Line that's still running, trains will operate every six to seven minutes. On the discontinued segments of the Red Line, there'll be "limited substitute bus service" on the Ashmont and Braintree branches. Also limited bus replacement for the Mattapan Line.
Orange Line trains will run every 12 minutes, with limited bus service between Oak Grove and Sullivan and between Back Bay and Forest Hills.
Green Line trolleys will run every five or six minutes. Also:
Along the B branch, Route 57 buses will make stops between Packards Corner and Kenmore Stations. There will be no bus service between Packards Corner and Boston College.
Along the C branch, limited shuttle bus service will be available between Cleveland Circle and Kenmore.
Along the E branch, Route 39 buses will make stops between Northeastern and Heath St. Stations.
Buses, including the Silver Line, will run on weekday schedules, but expect delays.
Please note that parking in MBTA garages will continue to be permitted, but availability may be limited. Lynn, Beverly, Salem, and Wonderland Garages will continue to have low availability. Additional parking availability information can be found here. Illegally parked vehicles in garages that are found to be blocking pedestrian access ways and/or traffic lanes will be subject to towing. Passengers are encouraged to park in garages only when leaving their vehicle on the premises overnight.
MBTA passengers may also park in available Massport parking at Suffolk Downs Station and board Massport employee shuttles either to Airport terminals or to the Blue Line Airport Station.
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
What on earth have they been
By DTP
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 5:05pm
What on earth have they been doing all day today, if they can't operate any more service tomorrow than they did today?
Wasn't the point of running limited service today so that they could clear stuff enough to run more service tomorrow?
And why on earth
By roadman
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 5:11pm
will the enclosed parking garages have only "limited availability"?
Because they're open to
By DTP
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 5:12pm
Because they're open to parking for local residents in addition to the usual commuters. The Lynn garage has been filling up regularly.
Thanks for the clarification
By roadman
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 5:23pm
Apparently the T finds it too difficult to provide the same clarification to their customers.
Speaking of miscommunication
By anon
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 8:48pm
The MBTA website and twitter today constantly repeated that inbound E Line service was running from Symphony. However, passengers reported that the station was locked, and people heading outbound were kicked off at the Pru.
Right now, the website doesn't even say anything for tomorrow. There's just a gap between Northeastern and Copley. I assume the worst and that the 39 will be bearing the brunt of this, not that people coming from Forest Hills will be using that either...
check out this "insaniT"
By anon
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 10:32pm
check out this "insaniT" campaign:
inktothepeople.com/insanit-2
So the money goes to the MBTA
By anon
Tue, 02/17/2015 - 7:14am
So the money goes to the MBTA Unions and the campaign describes buying one of these t-shirts as a way to contribute to MBTA improvement? Explain that one to me.
I can only hope that the
By anon
Tue, 02/17/2015 - 10:43pm
I can only hope that the alliance of the unions will use the money for good...can you suggest a better benefactor for the profits of these t-shirts? Regardless, we call get a way to express our solidarity with other Bostonians and T-riders. Hopefully the money will be used for good.
Here is the new T-shirt with
By anon
Tue, 02/17/2015 - 11:47pm
Here is the new T-shirt with a more thorough description. Thanks for your feed back and please share!
http://inktothepeople.com/insanit-5
The site you link to does
By jenniednotloggedin
Tue, 02/17/2015 - 10:01am
The site you link to does seem a bit short on explanation when it comes to how buying a T shirt will actually help improve service. Do you have any additional info?
I can't make any promises but
By anon
Tue, 02/17/2015 - 10:41pm
I can't make any promises but it is better than nothing. All profits from the T-shirts will go to the Alliance of Unions of the MBTA. Hopefully they will use that money to hire more staff or buy a new train. Regardless, you get a T-shirt to express your solidarity with other T-riders.
Seems like gov baker is
By anon
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 5:12pm
Seems like gov baker is getting us used to his dream of killing the Mbta completely and turning it into an all bus service with all the savings dedicated to highways. A republican wet dream.
Yeah those fricken
By All3ofThem
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 5:43pm
Yeah those fricken Republicans in the legislature sure did a great job under funding the MBTA since its inception.
Prior administrations....
By Doug1001
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 5:52pm
What kind of investments did they make over the years to help the situation? The T has been horribly mismanaged for who knows how long but let's blame Baker who has been in office for how long?
Your comment was funny though.
BDS
By moxie
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 6:05pm
Baker Derangement Syndrome.
Oh stop it
By Doug1001
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 6:15pm
Everyone has kicked the can down the road for years......might as well add "derangement syndrome" after everyone's name that has been governor here if we're playing that game.
Do the math
By moxie
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 6:27pm
Baker's been in office for two months, and he's got one of seven votes on the MBTA Board of Directors.
Blaming him at this point is like blaming Bush for 2014 drone attacks in Aghanistan.
Agreed
By Doug1001
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 6:32pm
Looks like I misunderstood your initial comment.
Selective amnesia.
By SwirlyGrrl
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 7:00pm
Where is this amnesty when we are talking about releasing people who have been in jail for 20 years? I mean, it was something they did 20 years ago that put them there - no fair holding it against them now, right?
Huh? Whaaa-aa?
By moxie
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 7:03pm
I blame Bush-aker, Dammit!
Minor nit
By anon
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 10:24pm
Actually, it's exactly unlike that. We can certainly blame things happening now on past leaders—sometimes it takes a while for the chickens to come home to roost. But we can't blame leaders now for things that happened in the past, which is what (as you seem to agree) is going on with the MBTA: The T has been slowly failing for decades; this recent snowstorm has just made it all undeniably visible.
When bad weather hits, generally,
By mplo
Tue, 02/17/2015 - 11:06am
The MBTA's failures are laid bare, for all to see.
Baker the Governor was also,
By Robert Thau
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 7:48pm
Baker the Governor was also, in a prior gig, Baker the Weld Administration Treasury Secretary whose financial manipulations saddled the T with over $10 billion of Big Dig debt. The need to pay down that debt is the reason that the T has been deferring maintenance ever since, with consequences that we're seeing right now.
So yes, it is perfectly fair to say he deserves blame for the deplorable condition of the T's physical plant. Not all the blame, but a very hefty chunk of it.
Half true
By Harry
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 10:51pm
It was debt for past MBTA projects, including some Big Dig mitigation projects.
Also, it was at that time that 20 percent of the sales tax was dedicated to the MBTA.
Also pensions and other
By bgl
Tue, 02/17/2015 - 12:08am
Also pensions and other things, yada, yada, yada. The "big dig" stuff (really just things the T needed to do legally that no one funded) is only 1/3 of the overall MBTA's debt. Forward funding, as you pointed out, is what really killed it. Also, apparently, mismanagement, as it was receiving shit tons of money before 2000 and didn't upgrade the basics.
Can we not resort to
By brandon
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 5:56pm
Can we not resort to conspiracy theories? I am as blue as they come and self identify as radical left. Yet, I don't believe this is a Baker conspiracy to destroy the T. Rather, it's decades of underinvestment in maintenance and overexpansion that have left us where we are today.
Bad For Business
By FedUp
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 6:52pm
Besides, business must be FUMING over this situation. That is why I am so surprise that Baker has been MIA of late on this issue
"Bad for business" is the understatement of the year.
By issacg
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 7:24pm
Unless and until "Business" gets on the phone with every member of the General Court and the Governor little will change...that is until businesses decide that they simply cannot commit the necessary time, energy and money to operating in a location where their workers cannot reliably get to work.
And then it will be to late.
No one should underestimate the negative long-term impact that this total T implosion is having on Boston's international reputation. Managers the world over are hearing that our public transportation system is no longer capable of transporting people to work. Just put yourself in their shoes: are you opening your next office in Greater Boston? Are you expanding your office here, or are you expanding elsewhere?
People know that winters here are sometimes bad, but they also know that they come every single year. The effect of the last 3 weeks will not go away when the snow does.
About that Olympics pitch for this world class city
By Belmont
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 7:36pm
"...this total T implosion is having on Boston's international reputation."
I know - it's the Summer Olympics. But here's to hoping that Boston gets "passed over" until it gets a "world-class" urban transportation system - one
that will be viable even after hosting a future Olympics.
One problem with the Olympic thing
By Waquiot
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 8:20pm
Not that it is to be in the Summer, you covered that well. The thing is that the IOC won't care about the current state. If the organizing committee can show that there will be a well maintained system, that's what counts.
Now attracting regular business- that's a problem. Who would pick Boston over, say, Charlotte when our transportation system has been exposed as patched together with duct tape?
Charlotte?
By Ron Newman
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 9:06pm
Do they have a transportation system at all?
A better comparison might be Chicago, Portland (Oregon), Minneapolis-St Paul, the Sf Bay Area, or even Los Angeles (which has built a lot of heavy rail, light rail, and commuter rail over the past few decades)
Re: Who would pick Boston?
By Belmont
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 9:08pm
There's going to be these GREAT tax incentives - like the one given to Fidelity not to move out of state. (Well, maybe not).
Maybe the potential redevelopment of the T will be the Boston Harbor Cleanup or the Big Dig of 2020. Maybe. I just think it's going to take a Federal
agency to make it happen. In the meantime, we have "no term limits" DeLeo and a bunch of other sycophants who couldn't give a damn. If Charlie Baker can actually pull something off I'll be very impressed.
Well...
By A. Nony. Fox
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 9:25pm
Boston 2024 needs a big expensive MBTA overhaul plan before 2017, or they can forget about the Olympics in Boston. There is no guarantee that will happen.
Boston has an exaggerated
By anon
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 8:03pm
Boston has an exaggerated opinion of it's importance; many private companies are choosing to locate along 128 or 495. Office parks in Marlborough and Waltham are being developed not only with office buildings, but also with housing and shopping, including super markets and restaurants. All major Boston hospitals now have suburban locations. However, Boston can still be the Hub for gov't , tourism, students and non-profits.
A lot of luxury residential skyscrapers are going up in Boston, but more office space is being built outside the City.
Funny, many tech companies
By bgl
Tue, 02/17/2015 - 12:05am
Funny, many tech companies (large, medium, and startups) are flocking in drove to Boston from 128 and even Cambridge. I went to many a cool talk of companies now coming back into Boston proper as that is what 20-30 yo talent want, and Cambridge now costs to much for any but Google and MS.
I think
By El Danimal
Tue, 02/17/2015 - 10:19am
you are a few decades late with that view
Is this intentional?
By O-FISH-L
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 5:20pm
Time to wonder if this is intentional on the part of the T. Orange Line running at 40%? A week without JFK to Braintree? They just start shoveling the tracks today? Will someone in the media demand an answer from their former colleague Joe Pesatauro? Beverly Scott has properly resigned, what of MBTA Board of Managers? Back in the day, the media would be camped outside their offices if not their homes. All main roads and many side streets and parking lots are down to bare pavement. What is the real problem here? It can't be just the snow or the old equipment that worked OK prior to the snow. Seems like something sinister.
My theory is that this is a
By TinFoil
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 5:44pm
My theory is that this is a move to get the billions needed to fix the system to Olympic quality levels for the games.
Re: TinFoil...My theory is that
By O-FISH-L
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 7:48pm
You may be onto something especially with the Boston 2024 Olympics hiring a former top T official. A week ago, I think anyone of us could have picked up the Braintree phone book and gotten enough electricians, mechanics, laborers and volunteers to have gotten this thing running. What's this, the Red Line or Edaville Railroad?
On the one hand, I never
By anon
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 10:34pm
On the one hand, I never underestimate government agencies to pull one of these when it suits their interests.
On the other hand, from the very beginning of the storm troubles, one major failure mode that has been reported have been the DC motors on the older trainsets being destroyed by sucking snow into their air intakes. One of the Globe stories a couple days ago pointed out that the MBTA has a limited supply of spare motors and they were going through them fast. It's perfectly plausible that they are now past the point where they have enough working DC motors to even keep a sufficient number of Orange and (older) Red Line cars operational.
Fraud
By FedUp
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 5:15pm
Time for a class action law suit against MBTA for selling a service they can't deliver. Monthly passes are useless
Yes!
By cybah
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 7:42pm
Yes! let's bankrupt an already bankrupt transit service by suing them! That'll teach'em!
Not.
*eye roll*
PS - Yeah so you'll get about 50 cents for every fare you get back by suing because that's what you'll get after the lawyers takes their cut. That'll help...
. . o O (seriously where do you guys get this stuff) O o . .
Will be interesting to see
By anon
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 10:35pm
Will be interesting to see the number of LinkPasses sold in March compared to this month.
How long can we live like this?
By eiffel designs
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 5:19pm
This is beyond ridiculous. I can only work remotely for so long. And I'm lucky that I even have the option.
Yeah, I can't work remotely,
By 2
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 5:46pm
Yeah, I can't work remotely, so as much as I like to bed in my warm bed during these bitterly cold days, my paycheck is seriously missing those lost wages.
Ironically, I could work remotely if Charlie Baker would let me
By Kate
Tue, 02/17/2015 - 8:58am
As a state employee, I'm required to show up at work EVEN though I have a state issued laptop that would fully enable me to work from home. It's truly ironic that the state, which is MA's largest employer, isn't adopting a work-from-home policy for its employees who can do so. I could save the 4 or so hours I've been commuting each day (up from 1.5 in normal MBTA operation) and put that time into getting a heck of a lot more work done... And wouldn't be further contributing to already congested roads and public transportation.
The Dreadline
By Ed
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 5:22pm
Gonna re name it....madness. Any one know what limited bus shuttle service means...my best guess is twofold, limited buses the rest are in braintree and limited in dot to those at Ashmont cuz it's gonna fill the every hour I assume they run one.....I get it great for everyone else.....but what about the rest of us.....oughta be a free ride for shuttle and entry at Andrew....gawsh, just thought of what that's gonna look like......arms up all, buckle in for the samurai subway ride
Commuter rail
By pmcmahon61
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 5:25pm
Any yet they have made no specific schedule announcements for the commuter rail other than "it will be limited."
"Revised schedules
By roadman
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 5:59pm
will be available later today" - per the MBTA's "Winter Schedule" page.
In other words, they haven't yet rolled the dice to decide which trains they're going to arbitrarily cancel.
Sounds about right. I've seen
By Bea W
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 8:44pm
Sounds about right. I've seen the modified Fairmount line schedule and predict we'll get maybe one severely delayed AM rush train and no PM rush trains. That would be consistent with the service over the last week before this last storm. I can't speak to any of the others.
Keolis deciding to bus or cancel Fairmount outright would be less infuriating than anything they've done with it over the last month of storms. I'm planning the rest of my winter commuting as if it just doesn't exist along with the Redline south of JFK. No expectations, no standing out in -20 wind chills waiting for trains that aren't coming. Ain't nobody got time for that.
This is
By Kathode
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 6:06pm
what I don't get. How can you arbitrarily cancel certain commuter rail trains? How are people supposed to get to work or get home if the next two trains, which don't run often as is, are not running at all?
I'd really like to say
By roadman
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 7:00pm
I was making a joke. Unfortunately, it's more than a coincidence that the same group of trains keep getting cancelled. And I seriously doubt it's all due to the weather conditions - it could be 70 degrees on a sunny afternoon, and they'd find some excuse to cancel the 5:55 to Reading (and the 6:35 from Reading) trains.
if I might add, canceling
By Zabdiel Boylston
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 8:45pm
if I might add, canceling pairs such as the two Reading trains you mentioned is due to the fact that the 6:35 from Reading is the 5:55 to Reading. Same equipment. If these trains aren't making the "to" trips there aren't "from" trips and back and forth it goes. So the cancelations aren't totally arbitrary, it depends on where the equipment is and where it can be moved next.
The Fairmount ones get canceled the most if they're down equipment for the other lines particularly on the South side, unfortunately.
Yes, I am aware that trains are paired
By roadman
Tue, 02/17/2015 - 8:56am
like the example you gave. Still doesn't make it right. And I don't see that the T or Keolis has any sort of plan to alleviate this in the short term. Like accelerating the delivery of the new equipment for one.
And, as I've pointed out, this practice has been going on for over a year and has absolutely nothing to do with the winter weather, despite their alerts to the contrary.
Exactly.
By Cutriss
Tue, 02/17/2015 - 8:23am
If they know they don't have the equipment to make the 5:55 to Reading work, they should just amend the schedule to remove the trip until they can put it into permanent rotation again.
Leaving it in the schedule not only gives false hope to commuters who might prefer to stay in their offices a little while longer knowing they're stuck on the 6:20, but it also bones casual riders who don't realize it's never going to run.
I don't ride the T, but the wife does, and I've been amused/bewildered at how frequently (and often arbitrarily) the 5:55 gets canceled. And now on today's winter schedule, what do we have? *Zero* Reading trains.
Also (and I'm sure roadman is chuckling under his breath at this) - this morning we have something completely new from T Alerts - Re-adding a canceled train back into service!
At some point ...
By bweiss
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 5:30pm
... people have to start asking serious questions about the recovery plan. Yes, it's cold; yes, there was an unprecedented amount of snow; yes, the T is overburdened and underfunded. But there is almost no evidence of improvement. Is the situation much worse than they are willing to admit? Are the Orange Line trains not just broken, but unfixable? Has the entire power system for the Braintree branch collapsed in some mysterious way? Mayor Walsh did sort of imply that in his press conference this morning, but it could just have been the way the words came out. Has anyone heard if the press is asking specific questions about when, or if, the T will be able to return to its pre-storm level of service, feeble and unreliable though it was?
Where is the Governor??
By FedUp
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 5:54pm
He is supposed to be a no nonsense manager. Why is he putting up with this nonsense. I get that he doesn't have authority over the T but why isn't he speaking out for his constituents. Marty Baker is useless as he has been as whiney and defensive as Ms. Scott and even suggested that the T should shut down if it snowed this past weekend.
Walsh
By FedUp
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 6:55pm
I meant Walsh
Is in over his head. In his
By Lyndsay
Tue, 02/17/2015 - 2:05pm
Is in over his head. In his position, he should not be complaining to THE VOTERS about how hard his job is, or that he has nothing more to say. His handlers should be all over him about this - showing your frustrations on the air does not inspire confidence.
Seriously - can one single frickin leader in this whole mess show some confidence, and competence, in being able to handle it? Or at least fake you can? This isn't Hurricane Katrina. Yeah, it sucks, but snow is always part of the job in this state.
Somebody needs to be asking these questions
By eiffel designs
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 5:55pm
And more. We need a serious investigation into this shitshow.
Seriously!
By Sources Say
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 6:06pm
30 days!?! Refunds need to be extended for monthly pass holders and questions need to be asked as to just what exactly is the plan of attack to get things up and running again. Or do they even have one?
We're gonna fly like an eagle
By moxie
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 6:11pm
And this isn't my first Rodeo!
That's the plan. Just see last week's press conf. Any other questions?
Let's get those Brookline turkeys in charge
By Belmont
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 9:55pm
"It's hard to fly like an eagle when you ride with turkeys".
Unlike Paul Revere we have no need for a ride
By Turkey Liberati...
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 10:15pm
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHBmHnIhOME[/youtube]
You know what would be a huge olive branch
By Ari O
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 8:53pm
Announcement that the T is waiving fares until further notice, and that any February pass is good for March, too. Yeah, it would be a huge budgetary hit, but the state is already way in the red for snow removal (funny how there's never any issue with armies of private contractors plowing the roads, but when it's shoveling transit it's suddenly a bit deal) so it could come from the same pot. It would make buses run faster, it would mean that the T could remove some fare collectors and have them work snow removal and it would be a good faith effort to say "until we can provide decent service, just use the T because the roads won't fit anyone more."
And I totally don't blame the T for this! This is the intersection of not one but two 500-year events: way more snow than has ever been recorded combined with what may go down as the coldest month ever recorded in Boston. Usually, when we get snow, it melts (that big blizzard in 2013? The highs the week after were 36, 45, 44, 42, 42, 47). It hasn't been above 40 in damn near a month.
Unofficial policy now?
By HenryAlan
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 9:03pm
I can't recall having to tap my pass when boarding a bus at Forest Hills so far this month. That hasn't been true for subway or inbound buses, but the ones taking crush loads have been opening the rear doors and waiving passengers on without tapping. I agree, though, that an official announcement and an extension to all service would be a good idea.
My experience over the past
By DTP
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 9:43pm
My experience over the past week has been confined to the 66 bus, where passengers who enter properly through the front door have all paid, while the handful of people who squeeze in the back door don't.
I wonder what the budgetary
By anon
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 10:47pm
I wonder what the budgetary hit is going to be of both the huge number of people who refuse to buy a March pass, and the smaller, but probably still significant number of people who stop using the T altogether in the months going forward, not only out of the rational economic decision that it's not worth it, but out of disgust and anger with how the T is treating their customers.
Offering such a pass extension/refund would cost them money but probably earn them a lot of people back from that second category.
They've made statements that
By Lyndsay
Tue, 02/17/2015 - 1:49pm
They've made statements that they aren't giving refunds for subpar service. It's ours and ours alone to put up with. Yes, they depend on ridership #s and funds, but they also know that for some of us it's the only way to get around, so we will put up with it. There's a big difference between a service like the T and say, a private company's products where there is an alternative. For most of us, there is no alternative. Therefore, why should they care how the public feels? they'll charge us T passes, because if they don't, in a month they'll probably say they can't run a service because they lost so much money in refunds. Until the companies that are affected by their workers' commutes, or who cover transportation costs in the form of T passes for their workers, get involved and start complaining, I don't see T management caring about how the public feels. Beverly Scott has quit and is trying to wash her hands of this, despite what she says about staying til April. I don't think there is anyone else at the helm there. Baker admonishes them but doesn't offer solutions. Walsh is busy (and rightfully so) trying to manage the absolute clusterf*ck that is snow removal in the city. I'm FB friends with some T employees (conductors) who are equally as frustrated with their own management and service as we are. It would be great if there were a spokesperson or advocate for the riders themselves. We should be getting our local reps involved whom this affects - whoever the councilpersons are in Brookline, Brighton, Allston, Cambridge, Malden, Charlestown, Melrose, Quincy, Braintree, etc - it affects all these places, and there should be a unity among leadership in these places to advocate for the riders in their neighborhoods. So far the only leader I've seen say anything is the Mayor of Somerville.
I think the big issue is they
By anon
Mon, 02/16/2015 - 7:00pm
I think the big issue is they do not have enough people to keep up. They must be offering as much overtime as people can take, but there is only so much that workers can do. I don't think the trains are broken beyond repair, but they have such a large number that require minor to moderate repairs that it has become overwhelming, same goes for the track and power systems. They can bring in the National Guard to move mounds of snow at parking lots, but the National Guard does not have the skill to repair subway cars or repair frozen track switches.
Pages