Video shoot turns into melee in Dorchester
The filming of a rap video on a Dorchester cul-de-sac yesterday evening ended with six people under arrest and the confiscation of four loaded guns, police and prosecutors say.
One man had bail set at $100,000, two others at $75,000, at their arraignments today in Dorchester Municipal Court. Prosecutors had asked for bail as high as $500,000.
Assistant Suffolk County District Attorney Patrick Mulligan said one of the suspects, David Stewart, 21, of Dorchester, is lucky to be alive, because he refused repeated demands by police to drop the loaded gun he was carrying in one hand - in fact, he picked it back up a couple of times after dropping it while jumping fences in an escape attempt. Dorchester Municipal Court Judge James Coffee set his bail at $75,000. Mulligan had asked for $250,000 bail on charges of illegal possession of a firearm and ammunition, carrying a loaded firearm, resisting arrest and trespassing.
Stewart allegedly told police he had the gun "for protection; you never know who's going to run up on you, you just don't understand," the assistant DA said.
Mulligan said the same luck - and restraint by Boston police officers - held for Nickhlas Simpson, 22, who allegedly violently resisted arrest after yelling at cops and then pushing a sergeant on scene from behind while he had a loaded gun in his waistband. As the sergeant and other officers got him to the ground, he began screaming at the crowd he was being abused and then, when the cops discovered the gun, allegedly said "You're lucky I didn't pull that out." Coffee set his bail at $75,000; the prosecution had asked for $500,000 on charges of illegal possession of a firearm and ammunition and carrying a loaded firearm and two counts of assault and battery on a police officer.
Coffee set bail at $100,000 for Taylor Nelson, 23, of Hyde Park, who prosecutors say tried to flee into an apartment at 13 Fernald Terrace and, when he found it locked, burst into another apartment where he left his gun as police closed in on him. Prosecutors say he "began to wave his arms around against the officers" as part of a "violent struggle" to avoid arrest. Mulligan had asked for $250,000 bail on charges of illegal possession of a firearm and ammunition, being an armed career criminal and home invasion.
Mulligan said a large group of people were gathered on Fernald Terrace to make a rap video - a tripod and camera were set up in the middle of the dead end. When plainclothes gang-unit officers, responding to a report of "a disturbance of some sort," got out of a car to investigate why there was a large crowd in the middle of the street around 6:30 p.m., two people - Stewart and Nelson - began moving away from the cops and went up the steps to 13 Fernald. "Oh, fuck!" one of them allegedly mutterered as the officers approached, the assistant DA said.
Stewart then ran away, leading officers on a chase that involved jumps over a couple of fences before ending on Ronan Street, while Nelson ran into 13 Fernald. People in the apartment Nelson allegedly entered pointed out to police where he'd left his gun.
Meanwhile, Simpson and another man, Joseph Wheeler, 21, of Dorchester, were inciting the crowd of people in the area to advance on the police officers trying to take care of the gun arrests, to the point one officer had to use pepper spray to get people to back off and officers from across the city were called in to help control the situation, Mulligan said.
Scott Lauer, Nelson's attorney, said there might be another side to the story, one that paints a different picture than the prosecution's and shows just why a melee broke out, and one he predicted will come out once he collects video from all the people at the scene who got their phones out. He said the prosecution's proposed bail amounts were way out of proportion with requests for bail in other gun cases in Dorchester court.
Fritznel Vilsaint, 28, of Malden, and Andria Rowlands, 21, of Brockton, both had bail set at $2,500 on charges of illegal possession of the loaded gun police found wrapped in a Bruins sweatshirt in the Jeep Vilsaint was driving and Rowlands was a passenger in.
Their attorneys both said the two were in the wrong place at the wrong time and suggested that in the melee one of the people the cops really wanted dropped the gun in the back of the Jeep, which had its top down. Vilsaint's attorney said a friend had asked if they could use his Jeep for the video; he added police searched the Jeep only after Vilsaint had politely asked if he could leave what had obviously become a trouble area.
Rowlands had nothing to do with the guns or the resulting incident, her lawyer said. He said she is a theater and public-relations student at Barry University in Miami just two days into her summer break and only sat in the SUV to give her aching feet a break - she came into court still wearing the heels she had on yesterday.
Wheeler was the only one to walk out of court right after his hearing. Coffee released him on the $200 bail he'd posted after his arrest yesterday on charges of disturbing the peace and being a disorderly person; Mulligan had asked for $10,000 bail for him.
Innocent, etc.
Ad:
Comments
Well
I hope they got some good footage
I look forward to seeing the
I look forward to seeing the video's premiere on MTV.
MTV plays videos?
n/t
And speaking of the video...
...you think they had all the appropriate permits you need to shoot (film or video, not people) on city streets?
Could this all have been avoided ...
... if the film crew had simply notified the neighbors in advance that they had scheduled a film shoot for this time and location?
That, and/or, you know, not
That, and/or, you know, not carrying around loaded illegal firearms or something.
yeah i mean
you are correct and most reasonable people would agree with you, but its not like it has mattered whether the firearms are: legal/illegal, loaded/unloaded, or even: real !!!!!!
Well, according to BPD a
Well, according to BPD a "disturbance of some sort" was called in, so maybe the filming went sideways. At that point it doesn't matter whether the neighbors knew about the filming or not.
I can't tell if your joking
I can't tell if your joking or serious with that question/comment, Ronald.
Sounds like BPD showed amazing restraint.
It's just amazing to me that the crowd would be more hostile toward the police than the gun-toting hoods. Isn't everyone pretty much in agreement that guns are destroying that neighborhood? Isn't getting these guys and these guns off the streets, at least temporarily, a good thing? Glad those folks turned in the weapon one of the bad guys tried to ditch in their home -- armed home invasion, anyone?
The crowd was the "hoods"
Not the Dorchester citizens who lived there for the most part.
lol it is telling about our society
that it is considered 'restraint' to not....what? kill all the people involved?
yes, you didnt kill any of your fellow humans today. admirable restraint you displayed sir
It was considerable restraint
It was considerable restraint that the officers didn't take down the guy (allegedly) waving the loaded gun at them that he (allegedly) picked up a few times after dropping it. Not shooting the bystanders didn't seem to be part of that when reading the full report.
What if they are trying to kill you?
probably means showing restraint in a very stressful situation caused by someone pointing a loaded hand gun at you and disobeying your lawful orders to drop said weapon.
What has been your experience
What has been your experience in this matter? I'm curious. You must have remained completely calm and zen-like while chasing a gun-totting suspect as you gave chase after him?
I am assuming you have had personal experience in a similar circumstance, correct? Why else would you be so quick to critique what was INCREDIBLE restraint in the face of possible death? Please enlighten us as to how you have managed to suppress all human emotion in the course of your duty. Thanks.
- a Boston Cop
i know its tough
to be a cop now that cameras are ubiquitous, and there is a lot more communication and social awareness in the world.
but no, i'm sorry. i don't think kudos for doing the right thing are the bar we want to set for our police departments. i know this is a helluva shock now, especially if you've got some tenure. but i choose to raise the bar higher for people that volunteer to be placed in these situations.
to be clear, i'm glad i live in a city that has a police force that can 'restrain' from executing its citizens in the street. and that cop did do the right thing from what i can tell.
i've had almost overwhelmingly positive experiences with cops for the entirety of my life. but i'm not going to give somebody kudos for what is, effectively, doing their job.
Just a question then...
Who you do give kudos to?
Firefighter who goes into a burning building to save a life (doing his job)
Teacher who improves the education of their students (job)
Social worker who turns a kids life around (job)
Astronaut going to the moon (job)
Tom Brady for throwing touchdowns (job)
General Patton beating Rommel on the battlefield (job)
Maybe a 3 year old going potty? Is that the threshold?
i am holding police to a higher standard
if that is what youre suggesting then yes, i am
especially compared to a kid not pissing himself. i would say i hold police to a higher standard.
in fact, looking back on what i wrote, i even specifically said i was referring to police.
No you were talking about "doing the right thing"
Aren't all of the above jobs I mentioned people who are trained to do a specific job "right"? Who doesn't volunteer to do anything except 3 year olds?
well pete
that is a copy and paste of part of my post where i specify that i'm talking about the police departments.
so if i need to be even more specific, for whatever reason, in saying that i am talking about holding police to a higher standard. i will just say it again.
im holding police to a higher, and different standard of conduct than the average people and most professions.
Still doesn't make sense.
A human being who volunteers for a job which requires them to have a gun and react to other human beings with guns is what we are talking about. What "standards" are you comparing them to? You are raising the bar higher because they volunteered or because they are trained? Are you saying you are ok with a teacher who doesn't give 100% or a firefighter who only goes into burning buildings 75% of the time? Your premise doesn't make logical sense.
Seriously though, who can you give kudos to?
C'mon
Yes, the police were doing their jobs. When they do their jobs well on an ordinary basis, that isn't cause for praise, perhaps.
BUT this time they had a huge shitshow on their hands and managed to get it all sorted out and took in a bunch of dangerous people without a horrorshow or a morgue.
Give badass awesome it's due.
Sorry, scumq
Sorry, no matter how much MSNBC you watch, and no matter what you may think of police officers, and even granting that there are plenty of cultural problems with the police in the US, they are armed under the authority of your elected representatives, and are expected to arrest bad guys and keep the peace.
And they are given authority (again, by your elected representatives) to defend themselves with deadly force under certain circumstances. Generally speaking, being threatened with a gun would fit those circumstances. So yeah, if a bad guy, in a larger and hostile crowd, displays a gun and points one at a citizen or an officer, then yes the officers showed great restraint.
I can't explain and won't apologize for every police action (see: Nashua video), but in this case- and in most of the cases reported here in recent years, BPD is doing very well and should be proud.
MSNBC
i doubt i've ever watched it once? seems like i'll have my own stereotypes about police officers and their history of violence, and kindly let you have your own about whoever you think watches MSNBC
also lol that you tried to swing blame around to the electorate for how their cops act. did the guy that got stopped in nashua as a MA resident vote for any of those people?
you might be right about MSNBC, i have no idea, but lets not shift the blame of police brutality, inaction, and other asorted criminal activities away from them. christ, i wish i knew which TV channel to accuse you of watching
Wait a second
Are you telling me it's OK to stereotype the entire population based on the action of a few? In that case, what is your opinion on blacks and jews?
I'm with you on the police kudos..
...but you lost me with the MSNBC bashing. You should never rely on one single source for all of your news and commentary, but MSNBC -- in terms of TV news -- is the best choice out there.