Jury convicts woman as drunk driver who killed a young girl walking on a sidewalk in Dorchester
A Suffolk Superior Court jury on Friday convicted Olivia Mora, 42, for the Nov. 26, 2013 crash on Olney Street in Dorchester that killed Briana Rosales, 7, as she walked with her mother - who suffered critical injuries herself - the Suffolk County District Attorney's office reports.
The jury found Mora guilty of manslaughter OUI, motor-vehicle homicide, OUI causing serious bodily injury and assault and battery with a dangerous weapon, the DA's office reports. Mora is scheduled for sentencing on Jan 6.
According to the DA's office:
During the course of the two week trial, Second Assistant District Attorney Masai King presented evidence and testimony to prove that the defendant was intoxicated while driving a Chevy Tahoe SUV in Dorchester at approximately 2:00 p.m. on the day of the fatal crash. The evidence proved that the defendant was operating on Geneva Avenue toward Bowdoin Street in the wrong lane in order to pass a T bus. She was driving above the posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour when she took a left turn onto Olney Street. She was aware there was a school in the area, but was traveling in excess of 53 miles per hour, when she struck a parked vehicle with enough force to push the parked car six feet forward. The defendant then struck a fire hydrant and continued onto the sidewalk where Brianna and her mother were walking.
Brianna was transported to Boston Medical Center, where she died of her injuries. Her mother suffered critical injuries including a shattered left femur and spent months recovering at a hospital.
After the crash, the defendant failed a series of field sobriety tests. A subsequent blood test showed that the defendant’s blood alcohol content at the time of the crash was well above the legal limit when she struck the victims.
Ad:
Comments
Sad
Wow, 6 years to convict. I can’t imagine the trauma the family has gone through during this. Hoping they can find some peace along with this ”justice”.
The technology exists
such that no new car should be able to be started without blowing clean, and no new car should be able to exceed the posted speed limit
The behavior of this driver was insane, but it's all too common. Tragedies like this are a daily occurrence. Automakers and regulators, if they care about safety and saving lives, will mandate anti drunk driving and anti speeding features in new cars, as has been done in EU.
Not to mention - the severity of this particular tragedy was almost certainly made worst by the fact the driver was in an SUV. These vehicles are far more likely to kill and maim people in accidents, while lending their operators a false sense of invulnerability. They have no place in our cities.
We must stop sacrificing people's lives to cars. We can have safer cars, safer traffic, the means are within our reach.
Ummmm
I don’t know about you, but I would advocate for tougher punishments for drunk idiots instead of advocating for $150,000 Corollas.
$150,000 Camry?
Get real. Breathalyzer technology isn't that expensive.
Look at how much is automatically controlled in Teslas and the like. That technology will get less expensive the more widely it is used, just like we no longer pay extra for air bags or anti-lock brakes.
I'm a car guy.
-- Marty Walsh
Story in NYTimes
I just read a story in the NYTimes about some of the issues with these devices. A brief summary:
- the devices have random tests that can happen at any time. A number of accidents have occurred while the driver was distracted performing the test.
- breathalyzers can have accuracy issues. The smaller units in cars even more so. A person who has had nothing to drink may get a false positive and be unable to start their car.
Personally, cars have too many electronics prone to failure. Something as simple as a heater control can cost hundreds, if not thousands of $$$$ to repair because of the electronics, when a simple mechanical control is easier and more dependable. A failed breathalyzer causing my car to be unable to start is unacceptable.
Like any regulation, it's a matter of trade-offs. Is the public willing to accept the cost of the units and the unreliability of them? I believe the current system in some states is a fair compromise - people convicted of drunk driving should have these units installed. No idea if MA has such a law.
Five years for a conviction?
Justice is slow.
Thank you for posting the little...
... girl’s pic. The Globe relegated her pic to the middle of the article and splayed the killer’s mug shot at the top.
The little girl and her mother are more important than the killer.
How many more?
How many more kids will be murdered by drivers before anything meaningful is done?
Two stories in a handful of days about drivers being held accountable? Sure, but it doesn't bring the babes back or fix the infrastructure issues that are systemic.
Habitual offender still driving.
The system is broken. Now another child is dead. Awful.
Sidewalks and pedestrians
When pedestrians cannot safely walk on the sidewalks of this City something needs to be done with the Director of the BTD and their boss the Mayor.