Officer in video punching and kneeing a teenager was investigated in ’08 death
By Anonymous on Sat, 10/30/2010 - 10:51am
Ed. note: The Globe story initially identifies the student as an Emerson student, but he was attending Emmanuel at the time.
The Boston police officer seen on a video punching and kneeing a teenager during an arrest last week was also investigated two years ago for his role in the arrest of an Emmanuel College student, who died after a confrontation with police.
Michael T. McManus, a patrol officer assigned to the district that covers Roxbury, has been taken off patrols and placed on administrative duty, police said yesterday.
Read the whole thing.
Neighborhoods:
Topics:
Free tagging:
Ad:
Comments
NECN:Boston Police officer placed on administrative duty
http://www.necn.com/10/29/10/Boston-Police-officer...
Boston officer who punched suspect followed the rules, union say
http://www.boston.com/news/local/breaking_news/201...
I wish there was video record of the arrest of David Wooodman
by Officer McManus. Is this the first time he is identified as the Officer who ordered Woodman to stop?
McManus was 30 and had about 1 year experience when he took down Woodman for failing to stop or making a smart comment or both or whatever.
I think it's likely McManus used the same technique on Woodman as he does in the video. I wonder if those techniques are safe for a person with a surgically repaired heart like Woodman's - a heart strong enough to play basketball but not to take a repeating punching with a knee and fist until the suspect complies.
McManus knew what Woodman had in his hand, a drink.
There was no concern articulted in reports about whether Woodman was armed, which I've heard said about the Roxbury CC incident (and now question whether there is a basis in fact for it.)
Could it be that Woodman didn't so much decide to comply as have been beaten into submissiveness or worse suffered blunt force trauma that triggered an arrhythmia and heart failure? His doctors said that he had brain damage from lack of oxygen while he lay on the ground handcuffed, unattended and unconscious.
If we had a video, we'd know more. (Who trusts the BPD incident report of Woodman's arrest is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?)
Lack of supervision? Other missteps?
This is EXACTLY what Swrrly was talking about.
Instead of listening to criticism like a professional and trying to set procedure that is 1) effective and 2) keeps the suspect, immediate public and police safe, he blames the public for their concern about what they see, and tells them not to record the police but instead record the criminals.
If I were the mayor, I'd have a private sit down with Nee and tell him talk stop bullying the public and try to solve the issue.
Its quite possible the public doesn't want Officer McManus or any officer going full metal jacket on suspects who are non-threateningly resisting arrest.
Listen very closely Nee
"It’s hard to trust the Police Department in the first place and this doesn’t help."
deminimus wrote:
Why are you the only person
Why are you the only person responding to your own post? You should at least set up a fake account with a different name and then reply to your post. It looks like the only person who finds you interesting is you.
it's not my intention to astroturf
I was reading linked articles and posted as comments things I thought other readers might like to read.
It still bothers me that officials like DA Conley, Davis, Menino and Stern say Woodman died of natural causes having nothing to do with the physical abuse he took.
Apart from whether he "deserved what he got" or "its procedure" he was arrested in a manner that caused his heart to stop and his face to acquire a case of road rash. Sterns report never addressed the cuts and abrasions on Woodman's face and that is what cause Woodman's parents to be so angry about Stern's report.
The picture in my mind has eight officers on top of Woodman and McManus kneeing him and punching him. In the RCC video, the kid says, "I can't breath." If this procedure causes respiratory seizure then it not safe and it may in fact have been the cause of death in Woodman's case thus manslaughter not accidental death. Thus a trial and justice not business as usual.
There is no question the $3,000,000 civil judgment is the legal systems way of saying BPD fucked up when they harmed Woodman and they FUCKED UP BIG but nothing changed - facial abrasions, arrhythmia, repository arrest, brain damage, coma and eventually death - but I don't know how to reconcile the police force policy described as "procedure" with the official review in which our four most accountable leaders say, nothing to see here, nothing to do, nothing to change.
The arrest or hancuffing wasn't found to be illegal.
I guess it shouldn't amaze me that you don't understand that yet.
Thank god we have judges and lawyers to decide that stuff and not people like you though.
(dammit I bit again!)