DA seeks postponements in OUI cases involving Breathalyzer tests
Word comes after it turned out two of the machines used by Suffolk County prosecutors for evidence "gave readings during calibration tests that were within the manufacturer’s guidelines but outside the narrower range imposed by the Code of Massachusetts Regulations," the DA's office reports, adding it is working with state experts to try to figure out what to do about the results.
Also, Suffolk prosecutors will:
Undertake two additional steps to ensure that the evidence from those machines is reliable. First, they will seek to have all Breathalyzer machines currently in operation in Boston, Chelsea, Revere, and Winthrop tested and calibrated at the earliest opportunity to ensure their proper functioning moving forward. Second, they will undertake a review of OUI convictions that used Breathalyzer evidence since the current machines were introduced. While we have no reason to believe that the very small number of affected Suffolk cases will increase, we have every reason to seek certainty that past convictions are based on reliable evidence.
Ad:
Comments
That's a paddlin'
That's a paddlin'
Still taking tourism motto suggestions?
Massachusetts: A great place to drive drunk!
Massachusetts: Take your next sip in the Bay State!
Massachusetts: So long as you're OK that's all that matters.
Annie Dookan Redux?
Familiar territory!
big difference between
big difference between falsifying evidence and what is occurring here.
Nope
This is a small difference between standards, not a wholesale fiction.
There are statistical tests to validate the overlap in any readings, and these will tend to verify the higher readings in particular.
Perhaps the question here should be
Why does the CMR call for a narrower range than the manufacturer's guidelines allow for?