Hey, there! Log in / Register

Boy, that must be some redesign they're working on over at the Dig

weeklydig.com is incognito these days as those rapscallions overhaul their Web site. Dudes: Might be time to invest in one of those staging server things that are all the rage in Web circles these days. You can get one for, oh, the cost of three or four iPhones.

Topics: 
Free tagging: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

The thing actually had a rat on a treadmill inside it. The rat died. Whaddaya want? Go to your nearest street corner in meatspace and pick up an issue. We'll be back soon.

up
Voting closed 0

the server finally got overloaded with all the mediocrity filling the Dig in recent months, and the rat stopped caring like everyone else.

up
Voting closed 0

What paper do you write for, 02132? I would so love to read it.

up
Voting closed 0

I do not write for any paper. But I have been a faithful Dig reader for quite a few years now, and have come to realize that the Dig of the last 6 months is quite a different animal than the Dig I grew to love. Th new cover makes the Dig look like the glossy rags it has always railed against, such as Stuff@Night (Nite?). Losing the truly original Guest Crosslord was a shame, but what it was replaced with spoke volumes. Its now done by the same guy who does the NYTimes, and is a puzzle that I can find anywhere. If you like, I can give more examples when I have a few more minutes.

The Weekly Dig is becoming more and more like every other free street corner mag. It used to take great pride in this not being the case.

up
Voting closed 0

We rag on S@N because it's ridiculous, not because it's glossy. (F'r instance, we don't hit Vanity Fair for its choice of paper stock.) And survey says more people are picking up the paper with the new cover, so hey, more readers for us, which is a good thing. But that's neither here nor there. Feel free to hate it. I'm more concerned with the innards.

If you're gonna have a beef with Brendan Quigley, however, I'm gonna have to respectfully get my dander up. The guy's fifty times better than the crappy crossword software we used to use--at two hours to press time--to crank out those unsolvable "guest" Crosslords, and we're lucky to have him. I will be happy never to see the clue "Sea Eagle" in the Dig crossword ever again.

up
Voting closed 0

I'm not hating on the cover. I'm hating on the hypocrisy of your periodical getting a glossy cover after years of using its non-glossy cover as a badge of honor. The issue is not the change in paper stock, but the change in philosophy. You became what you had previously mocked. You are one of the many glossy rags full of ads that the Media Farm always talked about.

The Crossword. This is another thing entirely. I'm familiar with Brendan, as anyone with an interest in crossword puzzles (or the Globe magazine) should be. Of course his puzzles are better put together than the old ones, which would occasionally just give you the answer when a clue wasn't readily apparent. The Guest Crosslord was about as poorly constructed as could be, but it was unique, and usually downright hilarious. It could make you laugh out loud harder than anything else in the paper, or at least as much as a good Exit Poll. Many other Dig fans I know also did the puzzle weekly, and it was one of the many things exclusive to the Dig that would make us go out on Wednesday nights to get the paper instead of waiting until the next day. Nobody is going to pick up the Dig just for Mr. Quigley's puzzle, because there are so many other outlets that also carry his stuff.

There have been a lot of changes at the Dig in the last 6 months or so. While the cosmetic differences may catch a few more eyes, the content has not improved in the least, and features some of us used to love are no longer there.

up
Voting closed 0

Omnia mutantur, omnia fluunt, quod fuimus aut sumus, cras non erimus.

up
Voting closed 0

Ovid would have liked the Crosslord as well...

up
Voting closed 0