Suffolk DA Dan Conley caught on video disrespecting murder trial blogger.

Incredibly, after I filed a Motion to video with the Court, and provided said Motion to DA Dan Conley's underling Edmond Zabin -- and then proceeded to upload 35 YouTube videos (now with 14,000 views) Dan Conley gave me the stiff arm and a finger toward the face when I moved to ask him a question at conclusion of the Dan Talbot murder trial. He doesn't like the fact that I exposed a situation where it appears that Officer Billy Soto planted a spent .40 cal casing on top of a Gatorade bottle in the trash. Those of us who shoot guns, even occasionally can see that, scroll down and look at pictures, click on them, they are trial exhibits that I shot in hi-res 1600 x 1200

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2010/01/dan-t...

Anyway, watch the video, it's only 2 minutes long. It should have been a bit longer but I was so shocked by his rudeness and unprofessional demeanor that I forgot to track him to the elevator.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJ5eFnD1iPk&feature...

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2010/02/kingc...

Conley, acting in a manner not unlike that of a complete racist, First-Amendment-bashing jerk, turned to my Caucasian Fourth Estate brother Seth Daniel immediately after disrespecting me and asked him if he had any questions, but the funny thing is (well it's not so much funny as it is arbitrary, capricious and racist), Seth and the Revere Journal have even used my courtroom photographs!

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2010/02/kingc...

While a public question is not an open meeting or public records request per se, he is in violation of the Spirit of his own comments that he made in these very pages:

Why does your office not prosecute violations of the Open Meeting Law? Or, if you don't have the resources to devote to such prosecutions, how about providing some advice and assistance to the citizens who are willing to take up the cause of transparency in government?

"We do handle open meeting law complaints and, through it, we do our best to foster transparency and accountability. The open meeting law is very broadly written - and intentionally so - but its fundamental purpose is to ensure that citizens have access to the decisions made by their representatives....."