The story behind HoboJacket, in which the author spends most of his time discussing how he built the site and ends with a comparison to Mark Zuckerberg (note to kid: He went to, um, Harvard). Among the valuable life lessons he learned from making bums/Caltech the butt of his joke:
People like to mess with you. The forms on the page are only capable of submitting integers to the database server (ie. every state and university has a numerical id; all data transmission is conducted by passing around those ids and some other datum.). I took a look at some of the server log files. People were sending post requests to donate "balls balls balls" on behalf of "dicksuniversity". I'm glad I took the effort to sanitize inputs or else the database would have been wiped several times already.
Oh, yes, thank goodness for sanitized inputs!
Via Boston Daily.
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
Grey area?
By MjolnirMan
Tue, 11/27/2012 - 11:27am
I agree that it's mean-spirited and people should treat homeless people with the dignity that human beings deserve, but on the other hand, would the people buying these for a laugh be giving money to charity otherwise? And since this has a tangible benefit, isn't that an acceptable trade-off for the disrespectful intention? Those who wish to give with respect have plenty of avenues to do so. This isn't nearly as disgusting to me as political campaigns or wifi-hotspot companies "employing" this same target demographic.
Plus, I don't know if any of the people helped by these donations would care too much about why they were donated:
http://kindworld.tumblr.com/post/31059482438/the-s...
Nope. Regardless of the end
By anon
Tue, 11/27/2012 - 12:11pm
Nope. Regardless of the end result, intentions matter. And this dude is a complete dick. He is the whole package of dick. He is equating another school with worthlessness, and then equating ALL HOMELESS PEOPLE with worthlessness. Dick dick dick dick dick.
Programming ability != Maturity
By swirlygrrl can'...
Tue, 11/27/2012 - 12:54pm
Both I and my husband went to MIT, but we would have to draw straws/flip a coin to decide who got the pleasure of hauling one of ours out of school by the nape of his neck if we discovered that this is what we sent out into the world.
I'd far rather release competent adults to the world, rather than superacheiving assholes like this. I hope his parents are proud.
Seems apt
By anon²
Tue, 11/27/2012 - 1:21pm
http://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/the-arc...
And surveying my Engineer/CS friends, spot on in quite a few cases.
Road to hell paved with good intentions
By anon
Tue, 11/27/2012 - 12:54pm
This guy actually did something that helped those in need. What have you done to substantially improve the lot of the people all around you who are in dire straights?
I think a lot of the pushback on this is from people who are made uncomfortable because it challenges them to confront their own objectification of the homeless and the measure of their own personal actions in the face of our society's widening poverty.
You mean like when they treat
By anon
Tue, 11/27/2012 - 1:06pm
You mean like when they treat us with dignity when cursing us out for not having any spare change? Screw the homeless, they're on the streets for a reason. And you'll never see me give them a dime.
Hilariously subversive!
By regular uhuber ...
Tue, 11/27/2012 - 12:20pm
I love this idea! Objectifying the homeless? Duh, of course - everytime [u]anyone[/u] uses the phrase 'homeless' - or any other term that defines to an entire population by a single characteristic and as a united 'thing' - they are guilty of objectification.
But the idea to take an impulse of (literally) sophmoric rivalry and morph it into a practical (and substantial) act of philanthropy is inspired!
You think you're better than this kid? What the hell have you done to keep a stranger warm today? If you want to show how enlightened you are go ahead and donate money to buy one of your own alma mater's jackets!
Muffin stumps
By adamg
Tue, 11/27/2012 - 12:56pm
There's some truth to this. The guy doesn't care about the homeless; he was just using them to crack a joke at Caltech's expense. That some homeless people will actually get clothes was an unintended consequence.
Wait - he said the *exact* opposite of that!
By Jeff F
Tue, 11/27/2012 - 1:18pm
eg "HoboJacket is meant to be an edgy way to incentivize more people to donate."
You and others (here and elsewhere) seem to be attributing motivations to this guy that I have not seen him make - either on his site, nor in the quotes of the linked articles.
He spells out pretty clearly that his intent was to take a petty joke and re-engineer it into an act of practical assistance.
***
btw, like swirlygrrl, I'm an MIT alum. But I find the idea of homeless folks being given warm jackets with the MIT logo delightfully ironic. Swirly - if you know anything about the current state of societal awareness among MIT students, you'd know that even thinking about the plight of the homeless puts this guy in the 90th percentile. Actually creating something that will have an immediate positive impact on the lives of others who are suffering? That puts him in the top 99.9th.
Who the frak cares if someone from Caltech or MIT is embarrassed by seeing a poor stranger in their alma maters' colors? It might actually shake them up and make them take a new look around. I say good on him for a successful culture jam!
"everytime anyone uses the
By anon
Tue, 11/27/2012 - 3:07pm
"everytime anyone uses the phrase 'homeless' - or any other term that defines to an entire population by a single characteristic and as a united 'thing' - they are guilty of objectification."
The word "homeless" was created because of the negative connotations of previous terms like "beggar", "bum", and "tramp".
So if you find the word "homeless" offensive, what word do you propose instead?
Never said i had issue with the word 'homeless'
By anon
Tue, 11/27/2012 - 4:32pm
Perhaps using the word 'guilty' in the same sentence gave an inaccurate read - my bad. I was trying to point out that objectification is something all humans do - we are pattern-matching, categorizing creatures. Its a neccessary strategy for getting through life - but it goes from useful to counter-productive when it's used lazily - when our categories become so rigid and unyeilding that we lose sight of the individual in front of us. I love the idea of homeless individuals wearing Ivy league branded clothes because I think it will shock some people out of their complacency.
I object mostly because it was written up in Boston Magazine
By anon
Tue, 11/27/2012 - 12:28pm
Boston Magazine is a hellacious neo-yuppie rag. I want to whack anyone who reads this piece of garbage with serious intent with a rolled up magazine, like you'd smack a pooch on the head for being bad.
I worked for a while at MIT and they do indeed have many exceptionally snotty and clueless students. Ranking somewhere on the Autism scale seems to be a prerequisite to getting into MIT.
Autism?
By swirlygrrl can'...
Tue, 11/27/2012 - 12:58pm
That's no excuse or even explanation for being an asshole - maybe clueless in direct interaction, but not an asshole.
Agree about Autism
By Nancy
Tue, 11/27/2012 - 1:21pm
I dated an MIT grad and he had Asperger's but that's not why we broke up. We broke off because we were incompatible.
What 'sanitized database inputs' means
By BikerGeek
Tue, 11/27/2012 - 12:32pm
[img]http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/exploits_of_a_mom.png[...
This kid went to MIT and
By JG
Tue, 11/27/2012 - 1:25pm
This kid went to MIT and didn't know to sanitize his inputs?
Visionaries Dr O'Connell Provider Of Health Care To The Homeless
By theszak
Wed, 11/28/2012 - 9:02am
By Sacha Pfeiffer
Visionaries: Dr. Jim O'Connell, Provider Of Health Care To The Homeless
http://www.wbur.org/2012/11/27/dr-jim-oconnell
Boston Health Care for the Homeless
http://www.bhchp.org/