Police Commissioner William Evans said a gun buyback program and stepped up anti-gun efforts on the street are working: Boston Police are taking lots of guns out of circulation, 970 so far this year, compared to 667 in all of 2013.
But at a public meeting last night about a shooting in Lower Mills on Election Day, Evans said the extra work is like pushing back the tide: Guns keep coming into Boston from states where it's really easy to buy guns, such as Florida and the Carolinas.
Still, Evans said the anti-gun effort may be having an impact. Across the city, shootings are down this year - the latest BPD stats show 187 shootings compared to 222 in the same period last year. He said this comes despite an increase in shootings in East Boston and the district that covers downtown, the North End and Chinatown - because shootings in Dorchester, Roxbury and Mattapan have gone down significantly.
Evans added that gang-related shootings are down, although he added that domestic shootings appear on the increase. He said that one troubling trend is that the shooters seem to be getting younger - it's no longer just older teens and men in their 20s who are going around shooting up neighborhoods. "Unfortunately, a lot of young kids have guns," he said, adding he was talking about kids as young as 13.
The commissioner agreed with city councilors Ayanna Pressley (at large) and Charles Yancey (Dorchester), who also attended the meeting - called by state Sen. Linda Dorcena Forry and state Rep. Dan Cullinane - that police work alone will not dampen gun violence: The city needs to work harder to prevent kids from getting into guns to begin with.
Evans pointed to the success of a program this past summer, in which Mayor Walsh worked with the IBEW on a training program for 15 or 16 teens with violent records. All but one graduated the program and now have good jobs, he said.
Evans expressed frustration with the court system. He said too often, police arrest somebody on a gun charge who was out on bail on a gun charge.
He noted approvingly that London, which has a very low gun-violence rate, has a mandatory five-year sentence for gun convictions. Here, he said, too many kids see our 18-month sentence as "almost like a badge of courage."
"It's frustrating for us, we're getting the same kids all the time," he said, estimating that 5% of the teens and young adults in the city are causing 70% of the problems.
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
Someone does a good thing,
By Scratchie
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 2:18pm
Welcome to Boston.
Actually it's quite true:
By Eric
Wed, 11/12/2014 - 11:20pm
Actually it's quite true: Employment is one of the most effective deterrents to gang membership, and that applies to both current members and future ones.
Thats not typically how gangs work
By Mike02130
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 1:04pm
Mel Steele is a recent example. You dont just walk away from a gang!
Can't they do both?
By Scoob
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 7:38pm
Are you suggesting that a thug cannot have a job and continue to commit crimes during his time off? Just curious
Seriously?
By lbb
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 9:15pm
What do you do when you get done with work? Put your feet up and watch TV, probably. If you're very energetic, you might go to the gym. But go out and commit crimes?
Having a job does provide an anchor and a reality check. Most of us can probably remember a time when our friends wanted to stay out late, and maybe for the first time we thought, "Not worth what I'll go through in the morning" and called it a night. Was there anything stopping you from drinking all night? No, you stopped yourself because you had to get up and go to work in the morning. I think that's the effect that's being referred to here.
Let's go get sushi
By Scratchie
Wed, 11/12/2014 - 9:05am
And not pay.
I am a long time reader and
By anon
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 1:04pm
I am a long time reader and fan of this blog, but your personal views and one sided predicatsble jabs are starting to turn me off. I have been freqenting this blog less and less. I don't care if you don't care, but wanted to share.
Well, thanks for sharing
By adamg
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 4:49pm
I haven't changed my views on things. What has happened is the site's seeing more visits from cranky people who seem to have grown tired of the Herald comment sections. And no, I'm not just going to sit back and let them do to my site (yeah, it is personal) what they've done there.
and we thank you
By cybah
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 5:59pm
And we thank you for that!
You might as well call it BDC Comments also.. its just gotten bad.. very bad. It's almost hard to read them now. All the intelligent people have moved here, and away from BDC and the herald (I remember I have DECENT intelligent comments on there, now its all vapid comments)
What's wrong with the IBEW program?
By Boston_res
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 12:49pm
The people who benefited from it were all younger (under 20 years of age if I read correctly). I think one of the best ways to end all of the violence in the city is to increase its level of education, especially in areas which experience the most poverty. Who's to say they're taking a job away from someone else?. Do you really want to walk into the "ghetto" slums and work on houses for EBT holders and section-8 residents? No? Well these kids most likely live there and will benefit from their environment as they themselves improve it. I would like to see more programs like this and fewer kids being tossed aside like meaningless rubbish.
Seriously. Is there a similar
By dave davery
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 5:54pm
Seriously. Is there a similar program for non-violent youth? I doubt it.
Seriously, there are
By adamg
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 6:01pm
Building Pathways (more) is one example.
Key word
By anon
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 8:21pm
Non violent offenders.
not sure..
By cybah
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 1:07pm
I'm not sure how I feel about this. I do understand the point of view of 'rewarding bad behavior'. ROCA does a similar thing, you stay in their program and stay out of trouble they pay you. Not sure if this is right thing to do. Sorry I don't.
I'm sorry but I am apart of the old camp that if you really want to do something, you'll do it. And if you don't want to, you won't. Meaning if you want to leave the gang or that life, you have to *want* to do it, not because you're being paid to do so. My old High School had a motto, and its fitting "No reward without effort". You have put effort into it, not do it 'just because'. Giving kids money not to do something just doesn't seem like the right thing to do, as it needs to be earned in a big way.
Now as far as the IBEW's claim. Maybe. *maybe* since its job training, and you get something for your effort (more than just a check), but not sure if I'd want to give kids with violent backgrounds access to power tools (hey! someone had to say it)
It would be interested to see how this works out in the end and how well it really does pay off. And how many kids stay gang/drug/violence free after. (happy to entertain statistic links if anyone has them!)
It works that way for people with options
By SwirlyGrrl
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 1:13pm
It doesn't work that way for people who don't know they have options, or don't have the options that you grew up with.
I grew up in a pretty rough place, and I've seen how this works firsthand.
Correct
By cybah
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 1:19pm
This is why the job training point was key.. not just handing someone cash for 'being good'. You have to work at it to get the training.
Even where I grew up in rural NH, we had a vocational school attached to our high school. Its where state-funded VOC programs were. Marketing, hairdressing, home construction, day care.... all skills that the day you graduated HS you could immediately use. I know more girls who now work in hair salons because of the training (and certification) the voc gave them.
So yes it does work...
"You have to work at it to get the training."
By lbb
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 1:46pm
Times change. If you were to back to your high school, what would you find today? Would you still find vocational programs, or would they be gone or greatly reduced because of budget cuts? Whatever programs are there, would they be teaching skills that you could now, today, actually get a job where you could earn a living wage? Maybe...maybe not.
I think it's natural for us grown folks to look to what worked for us as a way forward for young people today. But we do have to consider whether their options are the same as ours before we prescribe the same medicine, don't you agree?
This isn't MA
By cybah
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 1:59pm
This is New Hampshire.
Those same programs are still in place and have been expanded on. Why? because New Hampshire Schools and the local involved SAU's see value in these programs. Not only do the offer the original programs i refer to, but also now offer PC Repair/A+ Cert, Introduction to Microsoft Systems (for MCSA cert), CAD Design, Cisco Router Training (for CCNA certs), Expanded Home Building (this class you build a modular home!), Farming technologies, Advanced Business Accounting, and an advanced Culinary Arts program.
And as far as living wage.. first off, again, NH. You can survive on 10/hr. And trust me, any wage is better than living off welfare, which many of my former fellow residents who barely graduated (or got a GED) now collect on. And many of the newer IT-related programs (i.e. computer ones), Home building (i.e. construction), and Accounting programs do offer higher pay than 10/hr too.
I'll also add the same kids who went to the voc school, also had less issues with drugs too! (not all but some)
ok ok I guess I answered my original post.. it does work. Providing its a skill set and not a hand out.
It may be my years in tech
By lbb
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 3:59pm
It may be my years in tech have ruined my credulity, but I have a tough time thinking of MSCA cert as a path forward.
Seriously, I don't know the other programs, but the tech offerings don't strike me as exactly cutting edge. Sorry, I'm not trying to be negative, but this is the sort of thing that I've seen before from job training programs: they're behind the times. So, I stand behind my original question.
uh
By cybah
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 4:28pm
Let me put it to you this way, minus voc classes, out of High School what job could YOU get that do not require to ask "do you what fries with that" or "paper or plastic". Very very few.
I'm in tech also. Celebrated my 22nd year this year. I don't have any M$ certs at all or hell a degree for that matter, but I managed to do OK. (I should also state that all these IT-related classes at the Voc were offered the following year after I graduated!)
You obviously haven't looked in a while for work. Most jobs, and yes even entry level IT jobs, now pretty much require a MCP or some sort of certification to even be looked at (if you don't have a MIS degree). It was very very hard for me the last time. Not so much for the 'no degree' but I had virtually no way to prove knowledge, even though I have glowing references. The only way to prove it was in an interview which I got passed over on that for people who had CCNA's, MCSA's, etc because on paper they at least took, passed, and got certified aka can prove knowledge. (of course this does not mean they retained any of it, but stupid recruiters don't know that)
I am gathering that you're a Un*x person too. Typically Linux folks shun anything Microsoft. Sorry bud, MCSX is an industry standard for Microsoft peeps and is taken pretty seriously. And before you blow me off because I support Microsoft, I am also a Linux and Macintosh person too. I'm equally balanced toward any of them, except Microsoft seems to get me the most jobs.
I'm sorry I just disagree with you. I'm in the industry also, and yes I see the pumping out of everyone (except myself) of Microsoft Certs in the industry. And yes it over saturated the market, but because of that, its pretty much a required deal now. Hell, even a friend of mine (a young friend) who is in college for Business Accounting will walk away with a certification in Microsoft Office because of the way the classes work.
And finally, you may not think these are great or cutting edge, but for some kid who has zero direction in their life, its a start. Its a start to get them interested in something.. something that doesn't involve gangs or drugs, and may turn into a career later on due to increased interest. (and this is how I got my start in IT, I got a job at 15 at an ISP answering a support line... 22 years later here I am)
Oh and one more thing.. schools and voc are always behind. Why? because to offer bleeding edge technology courses never works. Hell, I took some Citrix classes last year (courtesy of my last company) and they were two versions behind. Why? Because course material needs to be written, tested, and deployed before they can be used in a class room. They need to be proven to work. Sure getting MCSX in Windows Server 2008 R2 may not be bleeding edge, but its better than say 10 year old Windows 2000 course wear.
Again, simply, it's a start for someone who may not have anything else good going on in their life and ask the question of "what do you want to do with your life?"
Are you familiar with the
By lbb
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 9:20pm
Are you familiar with the phrase "necessary but not sufficient condition"? A certification is a credential, and that's all. Any hiring manager knows that when it comes to finding someone who can actually do the job, it doesn't really tell you anything. A certification course is not enough to equip someone to go out and get a job. You need to do more than that.
And don't call me "bud", son.
okay
By cybah
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 9:48pm
Yes well aware of that. But unfortunately these days you deal with silly recruiters who are idiots.
really? a certification doesn't equip you to go out and get a job? Well yeah in terms of job searching skills (i.e. resumes, searching, interviewing), sure, they aren't provided in a certification course. Duh. I wouldn't expect them to be. Other courses would serve that purpose. But what certs do is make someone look better on that resume. A heck of a lot more than someone starting out with no degree and no experience. Many entry level positions just require a MCP or above now. And any entry level IT job is far better (and probably pays a bit more) than most retail and food service jobs. That's one of the main points of these programs.
Plus the other point of these programs isn't just so people can get jobs (although its the main idea), is to get kids interested in something else that doesn't involve drugs or gangs. Many kids who go to these program don't have much else going on, and a grim future. Many gangs pray on this fear. These Voc Ed programs shows them that, yes, there "within reach" alternatives to gangs and drugs. The hope is that this just sets them on the right path, to either more training, college, or to join the workforce to be productive citizens.
PS - You also doubt if certification courses provide jobs. If we remove the IT certs we are arguing about. I say absolutely yes it does. I can't believe I forgot the cornerstone of my HS's voc ed program.. a CNA program. Sure a CNA is a sucky job. But it pays more than retail, and I read in the local paper a few months ago that most graduates of the program eventually get jobs and/or get more training to a LPN and then eventually a RN. Do you know how relatives and friends of mine (that all attended the Voc)? More than I can count. I have four RNs in my family so far.. and more finishing up the RN.
Getting on the right path.. think about it, dad.
"think about it, dad."
By lbb
Wed, 11/12/2014 - 8:55am
Oh, another cheap shit-stirring swipe? Now, see, right there you disqualified yourself from having anything to say about what keeps people out of trouble. Think about it.
Listen
By cybah
Wed, 11/12/2014 - 3:17pm
Listen a-hole.. want to talk about "Cheap Shit-Stirring Swipe"?
Didn't you say above:
You started it first. I just dish it back. Fair Play.
PS Love how you had absolutely nothing else to say except a pot shot at me. Wanna run the
by me again because you're just did it yourself. I also think you know I'm right.. hard for an old fart like yourself to admit they are 100% wrong. *hiss*
PPS - I know what its like. I *was* one of those kids.. it was a VOC program that saved me. Once again, folks on here making big assumptions about me when they really have no clue. Thanks for playing... it's been fun.
Calling him "bud" was the start....
By Michael Kerpan
Wed, 11/12/2014 - 3:39pm
... a pretty rude and dismissive term of address.
Really?
By anon
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 1:35pm
Hanging out with your gangbanger buddies in the big house for a year, probably less, is seen as a rite of passage. Going away for at least five years, on the other hand, is a major inconvenience at the very least, and will deter all but the most hardened gangbangers. Also, it costs around $300,000 on average to treat a gunshot victim, and $30,000 to lock a thug up for a year - do the math...
Err, the relationship between
By Eric
Wed, 11/12/2014 - 11:33pm
Err, the relationship between sentence length and deterrence of crime is basically nonexistent. Certainly not something that has been supported by real data. In order for a punishment to be an effective deterrent, the criminal must first actually care about their future and believe that they have a chance at a future.
Also, what do you think happens to someone who had zero qualifications other than being a gangster to begin with gets out of jail after 5 years?
He noted approvingly that
By anon
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 10:43am
He noted approvingly that London, which has a very low gun-violence rate, has a mandatory five-year sentence for gun convictions. Here, he said, too many kids see our 18-month sentence as "almost like a badge of courage."
I'd say make it 10!
Um the UK has a MUCH higher
By anon
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 10:58am
Um the UK has a MUCH higher rate of violent crime than the US. The number of knife related crimes in London alone is staggering.
Take your pick
By stevil nli
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 11:47am
Between getting stabbed or shot I'll take stabbed. Also hard to stab long distance and hard to stab 2+ people before someone beats the cap out of you. Gimme knives over guns any day. Stupid argument.
How about a knife hand-in event?
By Boston_res
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 12:10pm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/7732187.stm
Misleading comparison
By FredQuimby
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 11:53am
The British definition of violent crime includes all crimes against the person, including all robberies, simple assaults and all sexual offenses, as opposed to the USA which only counts forcible rape and aggravated assault.
Its a bit like saying the obesity rate in Canada is higher than the USA when anyone 10 pounds over weight is obese in Canada but the clinical definition is 100 pounds over weight in the USA.
Does it now?
By Scratchie
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 11:51am
http://blog.skepticallibertarian.com/2013/01/12/fa...
I would also point out that even while urban crime rates across the US have been falling for decades, New York City's homicide rate (as of 2009) was 3.5 times that of London, which is presumably more of an apples-to-apples comparison.
http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2012/nov/...
Councilors
By anon
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 11:20am
Frank Baker (who was also at the meeting) is the Dorchester district councilor, Yancey represents Mattapan and parts of Roxbury and Hyde Park.
Part of Roslindale, actually
By adamg
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 11:50am
Not Hyde Park, and only part of Mattapan. A good part of his district is still in Dorchester.
Charles Yancey does not
By DotWatcher
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 1:30pm
Charles Yancey does not represent Roxbury or HP— and he only has a small piece of Mattapan now, something he'll tell you he is not happy about. Yancey mainly represents Dorchester, where he lives and has lived for four decades. People who call him the councilor from Mattapan show their ignorance— he's never lived there.
Doesn't anything good ever
By tcf098
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 11:22am
Doesn't anything good ever come out of Florida?
Can we please finally be done with it and sell it to Cuba?
Great news
By JohnAKeith
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 11:32am
That's great news about the guns.
No one asked him about the 25% increase in homicides this year, though?
Did you even read the article
By datadyne007
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 11:40am
Did you even read the article Adam wrote?
The meeting was not a success!
By anon
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 12:32pm
I was there any many people left shaking their heads when the police brass and politicians couldn't handle simple questions about safety at Ashmont station and Dorchester park. The Dorchester Reporter in an article today reports on the frustrations of many who attended.
Reporter account
By adamg
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 12:36pm
Here. The Dorchester Park issue was interesting - woman complains police never come when she calls, captain got kind of irate.
Thanks for mentioning it. I obviously went for the citywide stuff, but, yes, the main point of the meeting was the very specific incident in Lower Mills.
So,
By anon
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 2:03pm
I can threaten society with violence unless they give me a job? And there are people who think it's cool to give in to this blackmail? Or if I'm having trouble getting a job, I can just commit crimes, get arrested, or become or claim I'm an alcoholic and/or druggie, and there are programs in place that would give me special status, putting me ahead in the line, compared to the non-criminal, no-druggie chump looking for work? This is awesome!
No, that's not what happens
By adamg
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 4:54pm
These kids aren't "threatening society with violence" to get a job. They're threatening society with violence to make money, because they think it's cool, because they're subject to rather vicious peer pressure, whatever. A legitimate job is the last thing on their minds.
If an actual job can switch them off that path, what is wrong with that? I'm going to assume most of the people reading this are Christian, and I thought the idea of redemption was supposed to be kind of a big deal with you folks, but what I'm hearing is there are a lot of people who refuse to believe other people can ever change. The more's the pity.
So why don't you try it out yourself?
By lbb
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 9:21pm
Do report back on how that works for you. Or, alternately, admit that you're blowing crap.
New Methods
By speakingouthere
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 2:08pm
We need Road Check Points, random screening for weapons at Bus Terminals, Train Stations, Airfields, Shipyards, and Van Shuttles that come from areas where guns/drugs are known to be smuggled into MA.
Police do Sobriety checkpoints. Why not for weapons?
Laws can be made, no need for ACLU screaming unfair. Too many lives are being lost.
We need to try new methods to get these weapons before they enter our state!
From South-North to New York to Massachusetts!
Excerpt 5/22/14-When Brooklyn District Attorney Kenneth Thompson put out a 558-count indictment against six firearms traffickers who conspired to sell illegal guns here, all 155 of the weapons recovered by the NYPD came from one place: Georgia.
If you think you’ve heard this story before, you have. Last September, Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. indicted an individual who had illegally trafficked a huge stockpile of guns — via the post office — here from Georgia.
As good as the NYPD is at tracking illegal weapons, it’s impossible to catch everyone. The stark reality is that 90% of all crime-related guns recovered in New York City come from out of state. The illegal firearms that flow north on the so-called Iron Pipeline from states like Georgia with lax gun laws routinely end up in the hands of criminals here — all too often, with deadly results.
Anybody asking why a gun trafficker in Brooklyn buys product 940 miles away in LaGrange, Ga., should look no further than that state’s gun laws — or, more accurately, the lack thereof.
http://m.nydailynews.com/opinion/death-rides-iron-...
or we could not trash the 4th
By wanker
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 6:25pm
or we could not trash the 4th amendment
Sure, why not
By anon
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 6:53pm
Universal background check, at least six months between gun purchases, maximum 10 round magazine capacity, and mandatory 25 years in prison for gun trafficking - sounds good to you?
BUT...
Also 5 years minimum for illegal firearm possession, 15 years minimum for any crime committed while in possession of illegal firearm, and nationwide stop and frisk to do away with all the cutesy "illegal search" bullshit that lets 9 out of 10 thugs easily beat gun charges - sounds good to you? Gun control AND goon control, can't have one without the other.
Need thug control not gun control. ENFORCE BARTLEY FOX!
By anon
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 8:23pm
MA already has universal background checks, a 10 round limit on everything made after 1994, and Bartley Fox which has lengthy mandatory minimums for illegal possession which are never enforced.
The problem with more laws is that not only do they violate the 2nd amendment and as you've proposed the 4th amendment but CRIMINALS DO NOT FOLLOW THEM. The people breaking the law in the first place aren't going to suddenly stop by passing even more laws.
STOP ALLOWING VIOLENT OFFENDERS TO PLEAD OUT OF GUN CHARGES & START ENFORCING BARTLEY FOX.
The people using and trafficking illegal guns are no strangers to police. Stop the catch and release bullshit and the problem will go away.
Bartley-Fox
By anon
Wed, 11/12/2014 - 9:09am
The Bartley-Fox law is from the 1970s. It was replaced years ago by a new minimum mandatory of 18 months (where B-F was a year) for carrying on the street. This is enforced. In fact it can't be reduced. Everyone, yes every single person, convicted of carrying a gun without a license does at least that. I know it goes against the mantra that all these cases are plea-bargained away, but it does not happen. If you disagree then point to one, just one case, of a person convicted of carrying outside their house who didn't do at least a year and a half.
Also, the right to plead guilty or go to trial is the defendant's and not the government's. You can't prevent someone from admitting that they did the crime they're accused of. And, I mean, why would you want to?
Hmm
By polarbare
Wed, 11/12/2014 - 9:49am
If there is a "mandatory 18 months" for carrying, why was this person allowed to walk without even setting bail?
http://www.universalhub.com/crime/20110306-da-viol...
I understand that he hadn't been tried and convicted yet, but there is clearly a problem in MA with gang bangers and others with illegal firearms getting a slap on the wrist.
Pages