Shabazz Augustine, 36, pleaded guilty today to second-degree murder for the 2004 death of Julaine Jules of Malden, the Suffolk County District Attorney's office reports.
He was immediately sentenced to life in prison, but with parole a possibility after 15 years. Had his first-degree murder case gone to trial, he would have faced life without parole.
According to prosecutors, Augustine learned Jules had gone out with another man. Rather than moving on with his life, he convinced her to visit him one last time at his Dorchester home - where he strangled her, wrapped her body in plastic, tied free weights from a weightlifting set to her body, put her body in her car and drove it to Cambridge, where he dumped her body in the Charles River. He then drove to the Revere/Malden line and set the car on fire - which forced him to take the T home.
It took until 2011 for investigators to compile enough evidence with which to charge Augustine with murder. His trial date was then further pushed back when he challenged the use of location data about his cell phone as a violation of his Fourth Amendment rights. Last year, however, the Supreme Judicial Court ruled against him.
In a statement, DA Dan Conley said:
Julaine's family has waited patiently for this day for more than a decade. The impression they made on all of us was visible in the courtroom, where almost every State and Boston police investigator ever assigned to the case was present. Their first victim-witness advocate, now an attorney in private practice, made the trip to sit by their side. They are people of strength, grace, and unshakable faith, and I hope they find some peace in this unequivocal admission of guilt.
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
15 years in jail over some woman
By Will LaTulippe
Wed, 01/27/2016 - 2:54pm
SMH. If she's not your wife, your landlord, or the mother of your children, cut bait, bro.
What?
By M
Wed, 01/27/2016 - 3:22pm
Murdering a woman who is your wife, landlord, or mother of your children is not any more acceptable or justifiable, amigo.
Did I say it was?
By Will LaTulippe
Wed, 01/27/2016 - 3:33pm
Try again.
Then why did you include
By Scratchie
Wed, 01/27/2016 - 3:46pm
Then why did you include those three qualifying criteria in your post?
"Fuckin' context! How does it work?"
The point was that
By Will LaTulippe
Wed, 01/27/2016 - 4:07pm
He should have just left her alone. No need to engage her anymore. Why talk to people who piss you off? It doesn't appear that he was accountable to her, as in my three examples.
because
By Steeve
Wed, 01/27/2016 - 4:07pm
Because you can simply walk away from people you're not financially intertwined with.
Not that the qualifiers were good for optics...
Typo: He didn't take her body on the T
By Gary C
Wed, 01/27/2016 - 3:03pm
...or did he?
Ugh
By adamg
Wed, 01/27/2016 - 3:27pm
Thanks, fixed.
He was immediately sentenced
By anon
Wed, 01/27/2016 - 3:22pm
Bullshit. Bullshit.
I agree. Seriously.
By anon
Wed, 01/27/2016 - 8:31pm
I agree. Seriously.
Life sentence.
No fucking parole.
He only plead guilty because he knew he couldn't win the case. He tormented that family after he tortured and killed that beautiful young woman.
You're absolutely right. In
By anon
Thu, 01/28/2016 - 12:02pm
You're absolutely right. In some countries, even people who commit multiple murders and other heinous crimes go to jail for less time. Such countries treat criminals as mental health cases and put them through intensive programs trying to rehabilitate them so they can become productive and peaceful human beings, rather than locking them away in a cage at taxpayer expense for the rest of their lives.
Hasn't he suffered enough already?
By Scratchie
Wed, 01/27/2016 - 3:32pm
Add comment