Hey, there! Log in / Register
Next station stop: Kendall Square; Kendall Square is the next station stop
By adamg on Tue, 07/19/2016 - 7:25pm
Muerl was amazed to see an Amtrak train chugging through Cambridge today.
Amtrak uses the old Grand Junction bridge over the Charles and the tracks through Cambridge to get diesels and cars between its main system and yards south of the Charles and the Downeaster tracks to Maine.
Neighborhoods:
Free tagging:
Ad:
Comments
Amazing, isn't it?
On more than one occasion I've had to stop walking because the train was going through.
Cue the Greek Chorus
to lecture us about the moral deficiencies of the motorists in the photo daring to drive their cars in Kendall Square.
;-)
1. Was stopped at red light
1. Was stopped at red light
2. Was Passenger.
Also, wow I am famous now!
Replacement Bike/Luggage Cars Included?
Amtrak has had their bike/luggage transport cars out of service for months, missing pretty much the entire summer. Pretty frustrating and big fail for the Downeaster which keeps watering down their bike transport pledge.
I used to like the Downeaster but at this point it's the Concord Coach: Cheaper and more reliable. Amtrak makes the T look like a great value with terrific service.
The Downeaster's "cabbages",
The Downeaster's "cabbages", or NPCUs, which are where baggage, etc. are stored, have been pulled from service due to an incident on a Hiawatha train near Chicago where the train struck a vehicle at a grade crossing, and the NPCU came detached and rolled out of control down the tracks.
The cars will likely return to service after modifications to the brake systems to prevent this from happening again.
Honestly, NNEPRA is doing the best they can. They're beholden to what Amtrak can come up with for equipment, and if equipment needs to be pulled from service due to a safety issue, it will be.
The Downeaster from Boston to Portland is $20 in advance. Just getting to Haverhill on the T is $10.50 now. So for less than twice as much you can go three times as far (105 miles vs 35 miles). Which one is a better value?
Also, the Downeaster averages 82% on time performance (OTP). Comparable to the MBTA commuter rail's 85% OTP. I can't compare to Concord Coach's OTP, because that's not public since CC is a private company, but with how traffic is around here, I highly doubt they can reliably keep a schedule unless it's filled with a LOT of padding.
Finally, does Concord Coach let you get up and walk around? Does it have a full-service cafe car with alcoholic beverages? Does it have WiFi?
I know I would (and have) definitely choose the Downeaster over Concord Coach.
I took the Downeaster on Sunday
I went from North Station to Wells and back and the train I was on had a cabbage car on it -it was the same set on the return. I don't think it was being used for baggage though. I assume they weren't using them because not all sets being used had the cabbage cars. When I made the reservation, it did state "No Bikes", which was too bad, because my destination that day was Ogunquit and it would have been quicker, cheaper and easier to get there by bike, instead of the taxi we opted for. It took about 30 minutes in stop-and-go Route 1 traffic and cost $20 to go the six miles from the station to Ogunquit.
Pretty good deal
AND it's buy-one-get-one-free (if you can find the promo code on their site). Which means you can get a round trip for 2 people for $40 total.
And to think a retrofit with
And to think a retrofit with bike hooks and one attendant for 5 minutes could manage dozens of bikes.
Roll-On, Roll-Off is really really uneccessary.
Hooks with nylon webbing clips and attachments for securing bikes would be plenty. Other systems use this method without even any liability-insurance-premium-reduction straps.
Well regardless of all of the
Well regardless of all of the other issues discussed by the other reply, train was driving south. So the equipment was leaving the downeaster side.
Buy a Brompton.
Buy a Brompton.
Amtrak has never been that good at dealing with bicycles.
Imagine if
You could get on a train in Framingham and arrive in Kendall Square 25 minutes later, rather than an hour-long trip to South Station and on the Red Line? That could have happened, except it didn't because Tim Toomey. Eff that guy.
(Also note the state "planners" saying that there wouldn't be a major increase in ridership even though riders from Metrowest would save 25 minutes of travel time each way. Of course, it would be run by Keolis which can't run decent service out of a brown paper bag with the directions, and $11 million, printed on the inside.)
It's a shame
A couple of years back, I visited the Trolley Museum in Kennebunkport and was amazed to see how connected the entire region used to be via trolley/subway/train. Was it just the proliferation of cars that changed this? Also, if you've ever wondered where some of the old elevated Orange Line platforms went, the TM is the place to go.
car lobby
There was that "History Detectives" show that gets into the theory the car industry, and tire manufacturers greased the wheels of politicians in the 50's to get them to close down all the trolley lines. I would venture to guess that has a good part of it.
Oil, Motor, and Rubber
Oil, Motor, and Rubber industries worked hard to establish a more secure future for their industries starting in the 20s and 30s.
Read Getting There for some details.
The Rise & Decline Of An Industry...
Edward S. Mason wrote a great study of the street railway industry in Massachusetts (https://archive.org/stream/streetrailwayinm00maso#page/n7/mode/2up) that looks primarily at the economic forces impacting streetcar companies up to about 1932.
Street railway promoters (think that episode of The Simpsons) went around convincing the most rural places that an electric (!!!) street railway would really put their town on the map. Most small street railways either were abandoned outright after 10 or 15 years; or else absorbed into larger operating companies. Visit Colrain or Pelham today and you'll find next to no demand for public transit; now imagine those places in the late 1890s.
Inflated costs for raw materials (i.e. steel for rails, coal for power generating stations) after WWI pushed many companies that were at least breaking even into the red. Most of the long interurban lines were the first to be converted to bus lines or else entirely discontinued in the 1920s. Unionized workers who demanded better pay and working conditions no doubt had an impact as well. In the 1870s you could hire a guy to be a horsecar driver and expect them to work 12-14 hours a day, six days a week for about $1.50/day. By 1919 eight hours of "platform time" was seen as the upper limit of a reasonable workday.
The increased use of automobiles played a part; but one must note that auto registrations dipped drastically during the 1930s. The Depression hit all modes of transportation pretty hard. Large city-based operations (BERy, Eastern Mass Street Railway, Holyoke Street Railway, Worcester Consolidated, etc.) held out with minimal losses by converting as many lines as possible to buses and eliminating suburban routes.
One interesting method to preserve service in the face of abysmal balance sheets was to place the private companies under public control. After the Boston Elevated Railway and Eastern Mass Street Railway (the two largest in Massachusetts) started bleeding money in the early 1910's they were effectively placed into receivership by the Commonwealth. Public trustees were placed in charge of both companies in 1918. They never made money again, but at least the free fall into bankruptcy was slowed to a rough tumble.
On a smaller scale two companies were replaced outright by public transportation authorities in 1924: the Greenfield-Montague Transportation Area took over the core (and financially salvageable) part of the Connecticut Valley Street Railway; similarly the Athol & Orange TA took over the only profitable part of the Northern Massachusetts Street Railway. Running streetcars through places like Royalston unfortunately was never a moneymaker.
WWII offered a brief recovery, but the 1950's American Dream of a house in the suburbs with a nice Chevy or Ford in the driveway effectively wiped out all but the few city-based systems we have today. It wouldn't be until the creation of regional transit authorities in the 1970s that some of the lost service was restored.
That's about it in a nutshell.
I'm glad Worcester service
I'm glad Worcester service over the Grand Junction via Kendall didn't happen. It would have saved 25 minutes of travel time for one small group of passengers (people coming from MetroWest going to Kendall) at the expense of all the passengers trying to go to Yawkey (Longwood!), Back Bay, and South Station. I'm willing to bet passengers destined for those stations outnumber passengers trying to get to Kendall. It would result in a net reduction in service.
There's also the fact that North Station, while not as dire as South Station, is still congested and will need expansion in the near future.
And then there's the current condition of the Grand Junction, which would need to be upgraded, likely involving the replacement of the bridge over the Charles, which is in bad shape. Plus the fact that on the west end it connects to the Beacon Park yard leads, rather than the B&A main, and the fact that on the east end it connects to the BET leads, rather than the Fitchburg main. Then there's the issue of installing working crossing protection in Cambridge, which would only worsen traffic congestion in Kendall. Quickly these costs start to add up.
The GJ is not the answer - improving connections once you get off the train is. [psst, the Urban Ring would offer a quick <5 minute ride from Yawkey to Kendall]
It wouldn't need to be at the
It wouldn't need to be at the expense of Worcester-to-South Station service.
Plans for Beacon Park/I-90 realignment include a commuter rail stop somewhere right around there behind BU (yeah, I know - BU is being a pain in the butt about allowing much actual access to it from their side).
With the Yard largely out of existence, tracks could be aligned so that a connecting shuttle train could be run: BU, MIT/MassAv, MIT/Galileo, Cambridge St, BHCC/Austin St, North Station. (yeah, I know - getting manageably-sized train sets (like those DMUs or whatever they're called that we'd love to have over on the Fairmount Line) has a whole set of system tech issues which means that won't happen anytime soon).
If we're still requiring
If we're still requiring people to transfer to a shuttle to get to Kendall, then really what benefit does this have over the existing transfer, other than possibly being marginally faster? The one-seat ride was the real selling point of the Worcester-via-GJ proposal (which was at the expense of Yawkey/BBY/SS service). You're proposing replacing a two-seat ride with.... a two-seat ride.
And if we're using some funky DMUs on a shuttle run pinging back and forth (rather than using existing commuter trains), then why not just go ahead and build that portion of the Urban Ring? It'd be more useful to more people, and not render this shuttle service redundant whenever it finally gets built.
Then there's the fact that the T is trying to move toward MORE fleet standardization, not less. Can you imagine the headaches and expense that come with stocking all the necessary spare parts for a completely different vehicle type that you only have a handful of?
On the subject of the Urban
On the subject of the Urban Ring, anyone tried to adjust their Framingham - Kendall commute from changing at South Station to walking from Yawkey to Audubon Circle CT2 stop? I rarely use that bus, despite it passing under my window. But in the rare occasion I got to use it, it seemed very effective.
If Kendall were more accessible via mass transit
from the suburbs, would that provide some relief to the Cambridge housing market?
Hey look at that......
a North-South rail link and it's already built !