you think about throwing hands with someone over a spilled beer at a bar or a stolen parking space.
A childhood friend of mind got shoved off his bike by a much bigger dude at the playground, suffered a traumatic brain injury that nearly killed him and took years to recover from fully. He was lucky: my bud has since led a rich and fulfilling life, but it easily could have gone the other way.
Violence isn't never the answer, but you'd better be damned certain the stakes are worth it. Teeth don't grow back. You're better off with two functioning eyes and an uncracked skull. An assault or manslaughter charge will likely be a stubborn stain on your life, and a conviction may ruin it and grievously affect a much broader circle of people: your loved ones, the person you fucked up, their loved ones. If you're not a shit human being, living with the extended consequences of your momentary flash of rage, on the living and the dead, has to be hell on earth.
this comment has nothing to do with the facts of this case.
I would suggest that there is very little that is worth violence, but it is always wrong to presume the motives involved. This article describes a 15 year old girl that was assaulted and robbed, subsequently losing her life.
Given that it turns out that the victim wasn't robbed(*), I think it's reasonable to suspect that anger, and not greed, played a primary role in this tragedy.
(*) From the article adam ref'ed (emphasis added):
Police initially said via Twitter that they were looking for a suspect – described as a black male – who had robbed the girl of her purse and fled towards Boston on Cambridge Street; they corrected that some 11 hours later, saying the incident was not believed to be a robbery...
It is reasonable to assume that the attacker was angry but there is no information to support assumptions about the victims emotions. What is it about human nature that we hate all victims?
Thanks for this comment. We constantly see things in the media that make it look like it's normal and fine to get hit or knocked out, but like...in real life any physical blow is playing with fire.
It says this person was in the area and the cops want to identify them. Nothing more.
You're seriously jumping to conclusions.this is how lynchings happened. That is very dangerous ... would you step up as a witness if a bunch of twits branded you as a murderer? Or would you think twice no matter what you saw?
Comments
Tragic, and a useful reminder the next time
you think about throwing hands with someone over a spilled beer at a bar or a stolen parking space.
A childhood friend of mind got shoved off his bike by a much bigger dude at the playground, suffered a traumatic brain injury that nearly killed him and took years to recover from fully. He was lucky: my bud has since led a rich and fulfilling life, but it easily could have gone the other way.
Violence isn't never the answer, but you'd better be damned certain the stakes are worth it. Teeth don't grow back. You're better off with two functioning eyes and an uncracked skull. An assault or manslaughter charge will likely be a stubborn stain on your life, and a conviction may ruin it and grievously affect a much broader circle of people: your loved ones, the person you fucked up, their loved ones. If you're not a shit human being, living with the extended consequences of your momentary flash of rage, on the living and the dead, has to be hell on earth.
In the heat of the moment,
In the heat of the moment, you're not thinking about those things.
Perhaps if people had 15, 30 more seconds to think, they wouldn't go down this path.
Was this even rage?
Teens get physical with one another and accidents can happen. I had strict rules on my dudes about paying attention to surroundings when wrassling.
It's not normal for a teen to
It's not normal for a teen to kill another teen and it never has been. Teach your kids to keep their hands to themselves:
You don't have kids
Otherwise, you would know better.
Teach yourself to not comment about things when your have no idea.
tangenting all the way to Pluto
this comment has nothing to do with the facts of this case.
I would suggest that there is very little that is worth violence, but it is always wrong to presume the motives involved. This article describes a 15 year old girl that was assaulted and robbed, subsequently losing her life.
You might want to re-read the incident report...
originally, they thought she was robbed now it appears it was not the case.
What incident report?
The Tweets said it wasn't a robbery. That is no where near saying that this victim did anything.
I think it's pertinent
lethal assault = violence (in most folk's book).
Given that it turns out that the victim wasn't robbed(*), I think it's reasonable to suspect that anger, and not greed, played a primary role in this tragedy.
(*) From the article adam ref'ed (emphasis added):
I don't think it is reasonable to presume the victim is at fault
It is reasonable to assume that the attacker was angry but there is no information to support assumptions about the victims emotions. What is it about human nature that we hate all victims?
Thanks for this comment. We
Thanks for this comment. We constantly see things in the media that make it look like it's normal and fine to get hit or knocked out, but like...in real life any physical blow is playing with fire.
Really sad story here.
This young lady had her whole
This young lady had her whole life ahead of her. Some violent POS stole that for no reason. Senseless.
We don't know even that much
This could have been horseplay gone very badly wrong, followed by panic.
cyclist sought for questioning in cambridge teens murder
no description or gender given. definitely someone in cambridge riding a bike.
Source? Link?
Or just another speculative unsubstantiated rumor for the mill?
Even if this is true, it narrows it down to only 50,000 people in the area.
links about cambridge cyclist wanted for questioning
no speculation or unsubstantiated rumors here
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/local_coverage/2018/07/police_seek_cycl...
https://www.nbcboston.com/news/local/Cambridge-Massachusetts-Deadly-Assa...
Person of interest
The cyclist is a person of interest.
Unless you know something that you should be telling CPD, not us.
No, bostnkid. No, no no.
They want to talk to this person.
NOWHERE does it say that he or she KILLED anyone.
It says this person was in the area and the cops want to identify them. Nothing more.
You're seriously jumping to conclusions.this is how lynchings happened. That is very dangerous ... would you step up as a witness if a bunch of twits branded you as a murderer? Or would you think twice no matter what you saw?
Paging Adam Gaffin
Can you spike this entire run of comments, possibly replace with a summary of what the CPD is actually looking for?
There is nothing in any of this to indicate that the person that the cops are looking for is a suspect.
Thanks.