Hey, there! Log in / Register

Boston City Council rejects $13.3-million grant from Homeland Security

Louijeune speaks against Homeland Security grant

Louijeune explains her votes.

The City Council today rejected an anti-terrorism grant from the federal Department of Homeland Security when it deadlocked, 6-6, on accepting the grant.

It was the latest in a series of council votes in recent weeks on grants that had some connection to the Boston Police Department's controversial Boston Regional Information Center, but the other grants, which would help fund more data-analyst and other positions in the center, had been approved.

Moments before rejecting the $13.3 million grant, which Mayor Wu said would "help prevent, respond to and recover from threats or acts of terrorism, including chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and explosive incidents," the council had voted 7-5 to accept a $175,000 grant more specifically aimed at the BRIC, to hire two more data analysts and create more detailed crime-statistics reports for use at meetings with neighborhood associations.

Councilors Baker, Breadon, Coletta, Durkan, Flaherty, Flynn and Murphy voted yes on the smaller grant, councilors Arroyo, Lara, Louijeune, Mejia and Worrell voted no.

Breadon, without comment, then voted no on the larger "Urban Area Security Initiative" grant, leading to a 6-6 tie, which, after a brief recess, Council President Ed Flynn ruled meant the grant was rejected.

Councilor Tania Fernandes Anderson was not present.

Councilors Ruthzee Louijeune and Julia Mejia (both at large) said they could not vote for the measures without additional discussions among councilors and the community in general. Louijeune said she needed more assurances that the surveillance components of the grants "would not do more harm than good" in city neighborhoods, in particular Black and Brown communities. Mejia said she also wanted assurances that members of those communities would have a fair shake at any new jobs resulting from the grants.

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon $175,000 grant request87.17 KB
PDF icon $13.3-million grant request89.78 KB


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

BPD and ISD are funded well enough.

up
Voting closed 3

Remember that when you reminisce about the Marathon Bombing.

up
Voting closed 1

What is wrong with you? I haven't event taken down my Sept 11 decorations down yet.

up
Voting closed 1

Those two entities were the ones who decided that a foreign national on a watch list who had already left voluntarily should be let back in?

up
Voting closed 3

The Metro Boston Homeland Security Region encompasses the cities and towns that surround the City of Boston including Boston. When Boston refuses regional grant funding the entire region's funding is rejected for all the cities and towns that surround Boston. If the federal funding goes back for redistribution, then, another Homeland Security region may apply for rejected funding. It has only been a little over 10 years not to remember the Boston Marathon Bombing on April 15, 2013. Our terrorism alert threat is higher now than before 9-11!!!

up
Voting closed 0

I guess my net-fu is weak tonight, but I can’t find it. Just how much of the large grant would actually go to the BPD/BRIC?

up
Voting closed 2

Having some disgraced lame ducks with law enforcement "involvement" vote on this was imprudent.

Boston on the road to San Francisco / Portland Oregon style madness.

Related: Mayor and City Council getting a full photo spread and treatment by the UK's Daily Mail

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12859903/Boston-Democrat-Mayor-...

up
Voting closed 3

Why isn’t anyone else picking this story up?

up
Voting closed 3

the horrors of designating one of many city hall holiday parties for politicians of color; it’s no wonder the ultra leftist new york times hasn’t picked it up since it doesn’t fit their agenda,,,,,,,

up
Voting closed 1

until they find out about the Congressional Black Caucus.

up
Voting closed 2

you can tell how seriously to take their reporting by the SEO in that URL slug

up
Voting closed 1