Hey, there! Log in / Register

This is Boston, not LA, so restaurants need to cut it out with unattended bottles of tequila chilling in buckets of ice on tables

Managers at restaurants in the South End and a Faneuil Hall-area hotel had to explain to the Boston Licensing Board today why they got caught with patrons chilling with unattended bottles of tequila in ice-filled buckets at their tables when neither have licenses for bottle service, but even if they did, Boston's not the sort of place where patrons are allowed to be alone with bottles of hard liquor.

Both Stephen Chan, co-owner of Bootleg Special, 400 Tremont St. and Alex Decarvalho, manager of the Millennium Boston Hotel, who oversees its 26 North restaurant at 60 North St., apologized and said it won't happen again.

Chan acknowledged his restaurant's license does not allow bottle service and said he has never offered it to patrons. He said he had brought in his own personal bottle of tequila on the night of July 22 and put it in a chilling bucket on the table at which he and others were celebrating a friend's birthday. He said he had just left for a bit, to pick something up for the restaurant, which is when two detectives from the BPD licensing unit walked in for a random inspection.

Board Chairwoman Kathleen Joyce told Chan, who acknowledged bringing in personal bottles like that in the past, said he can't do that, especially since even if his license allowed for bottle service, in Boston, bottles always have to be attended to by a server, including pouring drinks - guests are not allowed to have self-service booze.

Decarvalho, now in L.A., pleaded similar ignorance, on the part of the restaurant's manager the night of Sept. 4. He said the company encourages its managers to be creative and take initiative and that the manager, a new arrival from a club somewhere not in Boston, decided to try to create club-like environment, like the ones she was used to in places that are more liberal with their rules for hard liquor at tables.

"She was not aware we do not provide bottle service," he told the board, adding, "I had no idea they were turning the restaurant into a club."

He said that immediately after getting the citation, the hotel closed the restaurant for extensive retraining. "We have no interest in running a nightclub or a scene," he said.

The board decides Thursday whether either incident warrants punishment, and if so, what sort.

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

This past summer Magoo was so hot Magoo got a giant bucket and filled it with ice and Magoo chilled in said bucket filled with ice. Magoo.

up
Voting closed 0

Chan acknowledged his restaurant's license does not allow bottle service and said he has never offered it to patrons. He said he had brought in his own personal bottle of tequila on the night of July 22 and put it in a chilling bucket on the table at which he and others were celebrating a friend's birthday. He said he had just left for a bit, to pick something up for the restaurant, which is when two detectives from the BPD licensing unit walked in for a random inspection.

What a coincidence...if only the cops had walked in on ANY other night...or asked the patrons if they knew the manager while they were there (they didn't right, so he can tell this fanciful tale about a "friend's birthday" he was a part of...ok, good, good).

And he just happened to have been out of the restaurant getting...something...for the restaurant...in the middle of the night or he would have just explained all this to the officers! Honest!

Sigh.

up
Voting closed 0

Adults might consume adult beverages in Boston in violation of some really stupid puritanical rules and a bunch of tightwads on a committee, what kind of insanity is this?

up
Voting closed 0

Restaurants and bars are responsible for the amount they serve to guests.

They are responsible for what happens when they overserve guests and they kill themselves/others.

If you don't want the control, drink at home.

up
Voting closed 0

Whether our rules are old/dumb/useless or not is immaterial to whether the guy just straight-up lied about the situation to the board when brought in to answer to the fact that he ran afoul of the rules.

up
Voting closed 0

First we have grown adults sitting a table with alcohol and the next thing you know we have...

up
Voting closed 0

First we have grown adults sitting a table with alcohol and the next thing you know we have...

...said adults getting into motor vehicles and driving impaired and killing people?

up
Voting closed 0

...said adults getting into motor vehicles and driving impaired and killing people?

For which the dealer who sold them the car, the gas station who sold them the fuel, and the liquor establishment that sold them the booze, are all legally and morally accountable, am I right?

up
Voting closed 0

For which the dealer who sold them the car, the gas station who sold them the fuel, and the liquor establishment that sold them the booze, are all legally and morally accountable, am I right?

Are you new here, or perhaps just very young? Campaigns to reduce drunk driving have always placed their greatest disincentives on providers of the alcohol, because that's where the most effective harm reduction can be done. Do you dispute this?

up
Voting closed 0

The one big thing that campaigns to reduce drunk driving have not done, is to punish actual drunk drivers. We put them back on the road with minimal punishment, even for serial offenders. I see a lot more value in holding drunk drivers accountable for drunk driving than in holding bartenders accountable for drunk driving. If we don’t have the moral or political will to accomplish the former, the latter is a blame-shifting waste of time

up
Voting closed 0

I see a lot more value in holding drunk drivers accountable for drunk driving than in holding bartenders accountable for drunk driving.

That sounds good on paper, but it's possible the "value" you see isn't in effective prevention, but in that old punishment urge. That's not to say that I don't think drunk drivers should be punished -- I do, very much. But that's after the damage has been done. While it might prevent future harm from being done by this drunk driver, if you want to prevent the damage from happening in the first place, you need an effective deterrent, and I don't think something that would be a deterrent for you or me is an effective deterrent for an addicted person.

up
Voting closed 0

Kids sitting with the adults at the table with alcohol being given to them by the adults?
Adults dying from alcohol poisoning at the table serving each other too much alcohol?
Adults discount selling alcohol to others in order to "finish the bottle" since they can't take it home with them?
Just one adult at a table trying to finish a whole bottle by themselves?

Like, I'm sure if we try hard enough we can find a scenario enabled by restaurants selling entire bottles of alcohol for consumption on-premise in a single sitting that even you would find a river too far and might feel some sort of regulation is in order to prevent, no?

up
Voting closed 0

Laying it on a bit thick eh?

I mean think of all the times you've been to a restaurant where you saw adults feeding kids drinks or a bunch of folks that died at the table from alcohol poisoning. I can't count how many times I've had to drag dead bodies from a table so I could order a meal. But I do love when the table next to me offers to sell their half drunk bottle to me for a discount.

up
Voting closed 0

Because we have rules that prevent these things. That's the point.

up
Voting closed 0

that some grown adults aren't really "grown adults" when it comes to alcohol.

up
Voting closed 0