Two city councilors want BPS to start installing cameras on school buses to help police track down and fine people who ignore stopped buses and any kids who might be getting off or on them.
Councilors Enrique Pepén (Hyde Park, Roslindale, Mattapan) and John FitzGerald (Dorchester) on Wednesday will ask for a formal hearing at which BPS and BPD officials can be asked "when?" now that the state has a law that lets local police use bus-mounted cameras to go after motorized miscreants. Their proposal includes a draft ordinance for installing and then using the cameras.
They say that Peabody cameras captured 850 drivers ignoring stopped school buses in just five week.
School bus stop enforcement should be regarded as a community concern not just to those utilizing the school bus. Drivers must be held accountable for unsafe behavior that could result in the fatality of school children.
The council is scheduled to consider the request to start the drafting of an ordinance at its regular Wednesday meeting in its fifth-floor chambers in City Hall, which starts at noon.
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
Complete hearing request | 261.53 KB |
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
Good!
By cinnamngrl
Mon, 02/03/2025 - 1:58pm
How about using all the traffic cams already in place?
By CopleyScott17
Mon, 02/03/2025 - 2:00pm
Where are these traffic cameras?
By Waquiot
Mon, 02/03/2025 - 8:52pm
I remember over 20 years ago there was a pilot, but I believe there were legal issues. Correct me if I’m wrong
Different traffic camera
By Just walkin'
Tue, 02/04/2025 - 7:55am
Traffic signals have moved away from pavement loops and instead typically now use optical detection. These units may look like traffic enforcement cameras, but the ones you see out there now is not.
It probably makes sense to keep those systems separate.
Miscreant is not too strong
By Frelmont
Mon, 02/03/2025 - 3:07pm
Miscreant is not too strong of a word for these degenerates.
This is a use of a camera I can get behind.
Other traffic cams/red light cams: Techofascism.
P.s., With regards to
By Frelmont
Mon, 02/03/2025 - 3:13pm
P.s., With regards to transit signal priority…. What are we getting ourselves into?
“ Pedestrian and bike-involved crashes increased after TSP intervention but could be caused by increased pedestrian and bicycle traffic, the effects of which could not be distinguished”-
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S000145751830410X
You think its fascism to
By anon
Mon, 02/03/2025 - 3:56pm
You think its fascism to enforce traffic laws? I dont think you know what fascism means if so.
What kind of facism is it
By cinnamngrl
Mon, 02/03/2025 - 4:38pm
What kind of facism is it when people oppress pedestrians with selective enforcement of traffic laws.
The subtle, creeping,
By Frelmont
Mon, 02/03/2025 - 5:13pm
The subtle, creeping, oppressive kind of fascism that shifts the societal pressure away from moral responsibility, moral action and moral teaching to docilely fearing surveillance. It shifts us from individualists to collectivists. ~~“Those willing to surrender a little liberty for security….
In case you haven't noticed....
By eddie van halen
Mon, 02/03/2025 - 5:24pm
you're in a sea of collectivists here.....most of whom falsely claim to be liberals.
I get that impression.
By Frelmont
Tue, 02/04/2025 - 12:59pm
I get that impression.
If it weren't for collectivism
By anon
Tue, 02/04/2025 - 3:33pm
None of us would be here.
Humans don't survive alone. Individuality worship is a recent pathology.
False dilemma
By eddie van halen
Tue, 02/04/2025 - 5:04pm
Nobody said or implied that humans should survive alone or that people should "worship" individuality. The topic was collectivism, which relegates the individual to a decidedly subordinate place in society. Good day, comrade.
lol intellectual dishonesty
By berkleealum
Tue, 02/04/2025 - 5:37pm
we must abide by your definition of collectivism as well as your definition of individualism, as using any other interpretation of either word would cause your argument to implode
Nonsense
By eddie van halen
Tue, 02/04/2025 - 5:56pm
I never stated nor implied that either. I simply pointed out the false dilemma. If there's any intellectual "dishonesty" going on here, it's your post. I didn't outline a definition. I simply referenced one of the major tenets of collectivism.
I'm not here to educate people with little to no understanding of political theory and philosophy. There are volumes and volumes out there at your fingertips. Read a book.
"Major tenets of collectivism"
By anon
Tue, 02/04/2025 - 6:26pm
According to whom? Do you have a reference?
Are these major tenets of collectivism in the room with us right now, Eddie?
Is this the same "Anon"...
By eddie van halen
Wed, 02/05/2025 - 3:05pm
who says completely different things on other threads? Like I said, not here to school people regarding basic political theory and philosophy. If you don't know what collectivism means in a political sense, then you really have no business using the term. Unlike your screen name you don't get to make things up as you go along.
collectivism, in your own words
By berkleealum
Tue, 02/04/2025 - 7:12pm
spoken like a true student of Marx.
/s
i know you will play the semantics game with the word subordinate – that's the dishonesty.
You know I will do what?
By eddie van halen
Wed, 02/05/2025 - 10:41am
You don't know shit about what I will do but if you want to point to something I've written and make a logical argument about why it's wrong - I'm all ears. You clearly don't know squat about political science or sociology. But you're very confident in your ignorance, for sure. lmao
https://library.fiveable.me/key-terms/intro-to-poli-sci/collectivism
https://www.britannica.com/topic/collectivism
I could point to dozens of other solid references but it wouldn't matter because you're the one who likes to play word games, and usually about topics you've clearly never studied deeper than memes on Facebook.
personal jabs will get you nowhere
By berkleealum
Wed, 02/05/2025 - 11:46am
it’s pretty funny of you to question my bona fides by linking your undergrad study guide, so thanks for the laugh. at any rate, i’ll make this simpler for you.
do you remember the comment you initially responded to? the one that compared collectivism to fascism and invoked that Franklin aphorism? my objection isn’t to the idea that collectivism, by definition, places the individual in a subordinate position relative to the group—that much is obvious. it’s that your use of subordinate was more than just descriptive; it was a rhetorical choice meant to frame collectivism as inherently negative rather than engaging with its actual implications.
if your goal is to have a discussion, you could just say outright why you think collectivism is bad rather than using loaded language to imply it. otherwise, linking me to a glossary doesn’t really do much except confirm that, yes, collectivism and individualism prioritize different things. shocking insight.
You invoked the use of personal jabs...
By eddie van halen
Wed, 02/05/2025 - 3:10pm
And if your goal was to have a discussion about the merits of collectivism you could have told us how wonderful it and how great it would be to replace our Constitution and Bill of Rights. I didn't see any of that. I saw a quick personal jab accusing me of intellectual dishonesty because I referenced a major theme of collectivism. That's it.
I did go back to the original post and to the post I responded to. Both of which were about collectivism, the second of which created an either/or proposition that anything short of collectivism amounted to a "worship" of individuality and and some BS about people can't survive by themselves. The first post correctly placed collectivism on the same plane as fascism, because the latter is an extreme form of collectivism and the passage implies a progression toward that extreme.
I don't really care that you're butt hurt because I pointed out that collectivism relegates the individual to a subordinate status. That's not being intellectually dishonest. It's a fact. I don't have to provide you with something that makes you feel better about that fact. I obviously see it as negative - I believe in the Constitution and Bill of Rights for many reasons. If you care to create a thread where you discuss the merits of collectivism in the United States and how your collectivist society integrates with the US Constitution and Bill of Rights, feel free to do so.
Musical Interlude
By SwirlyGrrl
Tue, 02/04/2025 - 9:34pm
This discussion brought this song to mind. Good excuse to test the video embed feature.
pro murder is ok for you
By cinnamngrl
Mon, 02/03/2025 - 6:01pm
There are ways of preserving privacy and still use cameras. What kind of moral responsibility only follows the law when there is a camera? I didn't create that reality, but you expect me to die for it.
Because it's guaranteed that
By anon
Tue, 02/04/2025 - 1:57pm
Because it's guaranteed that everyone who gets a camera ticket, or faces other negative effects of cameras, was doing something that significantly increased the chances of killing someone else...
well
By cinnamngrl
Wed, 02/05/2025 - 8:41pm
speed cameras and redlight cameras definitely do.
Bus cameras are pretty new.
Driving is a privilege, not a right
By SwirlyGrrl
Mon, 02/03/2025 - 7:48pm
License plates are public, not private. In fact, their entire reason for existence is public.
We could dispense with speed cameras
By Ari O
Tue, 02/04/2025 - 12:56pm
If we put an RFID chip into every license plate. It would be way more efficient than taking photographs of license plates, processing the photographs, and dealing with defacement, whether illegal (covers, defacement, etc) or legal-ish (road salt in winter).
It would also make certain transactions much, much easier. Parking garages could install license plate readers at the entrance and exit and bill you for the time spent parked there. Potentially even the same with street parking. No quarters, no apps, no little slips of paper on your dashboard. Given how easy it would be to collect and enforce parking fees and fines, we could probably pay less for parking because of this ease. Basically give everyone an EZPass but have it tied to the license plate. Visible plates are still useful, but we have this technology.
And, yes, we could easily enforce red lights and speeding with this as well. (We already could enforce speeding on the Turnpike, both with point speeds at overhead gantries and average speed in between, but the legislature put into the enabling rules for the EZPass/AET system that it can't be used for speeding. It has been used in the past for law enforcement; when a girl was abducted in Springfield the system spotted the car on the Pike, and state police were able to use an existing construction site to slow traffic down to the point where they were able to pull the girl out of the car without any high speed chase or anything.)
But people would throw a huge hissy fit over "BUT MAH PRIVACEE!" and it will never happen even though law-abiding motorists would reap significant benefits.
Parking charges and
By anon
Tue, 02/04/2025 - 2:19pm
Parking charges and enforcement by license plate camera is already here. Besides the Safety Sticks in Davis Square, there's also college campus parking lots with cameras.
Toll collection costs have not gone down since the introduction and widespread adoption of E-ZPass. I see no reason why parking collection costs and therefore fees would decrease.
A unexpected major drawback of the change from cash tolls to E-ZPass is the ability to discriminate based on residence. It's not that bad here -- "only" a 25 cent out-of-state surcharge on the $1 Pike toll between Newton Corner and Allston. But New York has the gall to charge an extra $4.25 on top of the $6.94 bridge toll if your E-ZPass is from another state, a 61% surcharge!
Imagine if buying a sandwich cost an extra 61% if you left your home state. Would people tolerate it? Doesn't it kind of trash the idea of interstate trade being free of state-imposed tariffs, which is supposed to be a constitutional right?
Some states claim it's not based on where you live but just on which state's E-ZPass account you have. But nobody is going to keep a suitcase full of E-ZPasses in the glove compartment and switch them each time they cross a state line. Rhode Island doesn't bother with the charade and just doesn't allow nonresidents to avoid the surcharge.
There's a really easy way
By Ari O
Tue, 02/04/2025 - 8:50am
To avoid speed cameras and red light cameras.
Don't speed, and don't run red lights.
I thought it was staying out of a car
By Plen-T-Pak
Tue, 02/04/2025 - 12:22pm
.
It’s not that easy. People in
By anon
Tue, 02/04/2025 - 8:14pm
It’s not that easy. People in NYC report stuff like getting a ticket because a tractor trailer was parked blocking the school zone speed limit sign, so they didn’t know the speed limit dropped.
Traffic authorities around here like to install lights that nobody can understand, like the one in Inman Square which is always red but sometimes also displays turn arrows, in an attempt to indicate you can’t go straight. Except it does something different outside rush hour. There are numerous complaints from neighbors about constant honking when drivers can’t figure out when it’s their turn to go, but nothing has changed.
Or the light at Beacon and Washington which was recently redesigned to add a left turn trap, which is highly dangerous, and explicitly forbidden without a warning sign.
I won’t even bother with any examples in Boston, since there are too many to list because BTD traffic engineering is nonexistent.
If cities can’t install lights that the public can understand, and can’t follow the law with their designs, I don’t trust them to do photo enforcement.
How about BPS responding to emails
By anon
Mon, 02/03/2025 - 3:50pm
Re: bus driver's driving erratically?
Valid, but...
By lbb
Tue, 02/04/2025 - 10:19am
...what does this have to do with the behavior of other drivers when the bus is standing still?
Which causes more risk to
By anon
Tue, 02/04/2025 - 3:06pm
Which causes more risk to kids?
Very few school bus crashes
By anon
Tue, 02/04/2025 - 6:30pm
Most are due to other drivers.
Which has anything...
By lbb
Wed, 02/05/2025 - 12:35pm
...to do with the subject at hand?
Grownups can do more than one thing. \
What I've heard from other
By anon
Mon, 02/03/2025 - 4:02pm
What I've heard from other states is that school buses often sit for a while, and then suddenly open the door thereby turning on the red lights. Drivers have no way of knowing when this is going to happen, and get photo tickets as a result. Since this particular scenario had been happening all the time for years before tickets were being issued, and there weren't any accidents as a result, it's not something that needs increased enforcement.
And for the actual dangerous driving, all the video footage of violations convinces me that I shouldn't trust a camera system to keep my kids safe.
What I've heard from other states ...
By SwirlyGrrl
Mon, 02/03/2025 - 9:02pm
A lot of winging by people who either weren't paying attention or think they have a right to ignore the yellow and red lights ... and found out.
A surprising number of them assert some "right" to not have to stop and make up special exemptions that don't exist.
Amazing how few people actually read their driving manual or ever refresh their knowledge.
Other states aside ...
By perruptor
Tue, 02/04/2025 - 12:01am
That's not how it works here. I haven't ever seen a school bus turn the flashers on after stopping, let alone after opening the door. Do you drive?
Yes, I drive. And I rode a
By anon
Tue, 02/04/2025 - 2:53pm
Yes, I drive. And I rode a school bus for all 13 years of school.
I searched for information about the New York State program. Lots of news articles about legal challenges to the program, but not much about a decrease in accidents.
Do you drive on roads like this? https://maps.app.goo.gl/G4w4LRntFXLb8WQm7 Almost half the camera tickets in Suffolk County, NY were issued at a single bus stop on this road. Is it reasonable to expect drivers 4 lanes over to stop for a bus? Is it even helpful for the safety of kids to require this?
The camera company keeps 45% of the revenue.
It's easy for a camera company to build support for such a system, since so many people are angry about (other people's) bad driving. The problem is that people don't care about the practical details, such as what actions result in the majority of tickets, and if these actions are actually a problem for safety.
No
By perruptor
Tue, 02/04/2025 - 10:53pm
No, I do not drive on a Jericho Turnpike. I guess you're still talking about other states, where the flashing lights on school buses are somehow controlled by the door. That's not how it works here, so your story about car drivers being surprised by the lights coming on after the door opens is irrelevant.
Ok, please explain how the
By anon
Thu, 02/06/2025 - 2:58pm
Ok, please explain how the lights are controlled in Massachusetts, and what safeguards there are for informing drivers exactly when the transition from yellow to red lights will occur.
Thats privatization.
By cinnamngrl
Wed, 02/05/2025 - 8:45pm
Which is always a ripoff. If we do this then lets build ourselves.
before the door opens the red lights flash
By cinnamngrl
Tue, 02/04/2025 - 6:58am
Which means passing is against the law. So the "fast" door opening isn't relevant.
Really? Not in my experience.
By anon
Tue, 02/04/2025 - 2:22pm
Really? Not in my experience. How long do you think the red lights are required to flash before the door opens?
And even if it’s the flashing
By anon
Tue, 02/04/2025 - 8:21pm
And even if it’s the flashing lights that start suddenly, rather than the door itself, the effect for being unable to avoid a camera ticket is the same.
Autocolonoscopy
By SwirlyGrrl
Wed, 02/05/2025 - 10:45pm
Lights always start suddenly when your cranium is where the sun don't shine.
how did you pass a driving test?
By cinnamngrl
Thu, 02/06/2025 - 7:29am
its flashing yellow then flashing red.
Please reread what you wrote.
By anon
Thu, 02/06/2025 - 2:53pm
You're the one who said there's flashing red lights before the door opens.
A driver is able to put on the flashing yellows in advance. But there's nothing to stop them from opening the door, thereby activating the flashing reds, if they don't activate the yellows first. And if they do, there's no guarantee of how long or short the yellows will last before the door opens.
As for your claim that I shouldn't have passed my driving test, I'm well aware of the meaning and functioning of school bus lights. This is plainly obvious from what I wrote.
Regarding what the law and MA driver's manual say about what car drivers must do when there are yellow flashing lights: <b>they don't say anything:</b>
"When approaching a vehicle which displays a sign bearing the words ''SCHOOL BUS'' and which is equipped with front and rear alternating flashing red signal lamps which are flashing, as provided in section seven B, and which has been stopped to allow pupils to alight from or board the same, a person operating a motor vehicle or trackless trolley shall, except when approaching from the opposite direction on a divided highway, bring his vehicle or trackless trolley to a full stop before reaching said school bus and shall not thereafter proceed until the warning signals are deactivated, unless directed to the contrary by a police officer duly authorized to control the movement of traffic."
"Yellow school buses have flashing red lights and stop signs that fold out from the driver’s side. School pupil transport vehicles, like vans, station wagons, or family sedans, have flashing red lights and SCHOOL BUS signs on top. Drivers use these warning signals when letting pupils on and off.
...
If a school bus or a school pupil transport vehicle has its lights flashing and a stop sign extended, you must stop. It is the law. It does not matter which side of the road you are traveling on. Remain stopped until the lights stop flashing or the stop sign folds back."
Nope, nothing about yellow lights.
There is a requirement for buses to have lights, and for bus drivers (implied by passive voice wording) to use them:
"School buses...shall be equipped with...alternating flashing amber signal lamps...which shall be activated when said bus is approaching a stop to load or discharge school pupils." But no requirements on how long they should flash. And the law authorizing cameras doesn't require the ticket to include proof that the bus driver put on the yellows properly.
One more detail I'm aware of which you probably aren't: while MA does not require stopping for a stopped school bus on the other side of a divided highway, some states do require it, including a certain large state to our south and west.
You are not qualified to
By cinnamngrl
Fri, 02/07/2025 - 6:52am
You are not qualified to drive. Nothing in your rant justifies passing a school bus with the door open.
I don't think that's how it works here
By lbb
Tue, 02/04/2025 - 10:23am
Every schoolbus I've seen in MA has a sequence: flashing yellow, followed by a full stop, followed by flashing red. Is it even possible for them to go immediately to red?
It doesn't matter what you've seen in MA
By proportionate
Tue, 02/04/2025 - 11:55am
This is a City of Boston proposal. And in the city of Boston, the buses have a single flashing stop sign that extends. And, that stop sign often extends suddenly.
I live between 2 grade schools and buses regularly idle while waiting for pickup. Once the kids (who are out of view, by the way) make their way to the bus, the stop sign extends. There is no possible way to know when that sign will extend, even if being cautious.
Hmm
By blues_lead
Tue, 02/04/2025 - 5:14pm
I wonder where the city of Boston is located?
A typical camera ticket
By anon
Tue, 02/04/2025 - 2:26pm
A typical camera ticket scenario is a minibus that's parked waiting for a kid to come out of the house, with yellow lights flashing the whole time. Even if each driver came to a full stop, which is neither reasonable nor required for safety, they would still get caught if the door opened just as they started to go. It would be analogous to a traffic light where the yellow stayed on for a long and indeterminate amount of time, rather than a few seconds fixed by formula.
Let me guess
By SwirlyGrrl
Wed, 02/05/2025 - 10:46pm
You are one of those drivers who think the first three through a red still have a yellow light, and honk if someone refuses to block the box or won't cross the railroad tracks until they can clear the crossing.
Nope, I'm one of those
By anon
Thu, 02/06/2025 - 2:55pm
Nope, I'm one of those drivers who stops for stopped school buses if at all possible, including in situations where nobody else is doing it. My concern is the corner case situations where it isn't possible, or even reasonable or desirable for children's safety.
Magoo sez
By MisterMagooForYoo
Mon, 02/03/2025 - 5:28pm
Magoo wonders why does the uhub website look different? Magoo.
Magoo sez
By MisterMagooForYoo
Mon, 02/03/2025 - 5:33pm
Ooooooh. Magoo read the earlier post and now understands why uhub looks different. Ooooooh. Magoo. 🥸
Damn
By Username Unknown
Mon, 02/03/2025 - 10:06pm
I was hoping the tired Magoo schtick would be retired with the old page.
Catching careening Massholes,
By anon
Mon, 02/03/2025 - 8:49pm
Catching careening Massholes, among other things
Only one thing here makes sense
By Boston_res
Tue, 02/04/2025 - 2:13pm
"Drivers must be held accountable for unsafe behavior that could result in the fatality of school children." See that? The "Drivers". Not the car owner. How exactly is a driver identified by a license plate? A license plate identifies the owner. That owner can be an individual, or an entity such as a LLC. When Drivers can be identified, and punished I'll say that anything like this is worthwhile. Until then, it's a bad idea.
Let the childish responses begin.
The camera will show a
By cinnamngrl
Tue, 02/04/2025 - 4:13pm
The camera will show a picture of the driver.
But you have a point. My brother's car is registered to my deceased father. His town has video enforcement but they send the bills in my father's name. They have never figured it out.
The bigger problem is obscured plates. Those covers are illegal, but it doesn't seem like much is done about it.
Add comment