![Freedom for the JP 3: Peter Blailock (with megaphone), Andrew Murray, Chloe Frankel after being sprung from E-13.](https://universalhub.com/files/styles/main_image_-_bigger/public/images/2019/jp3.jpg)
Freedom for the JP 3: Peter Blailock (with megaphone), Andrew Murray, Chloe Frankel after being sprung from E-13.
With a slashing motion across his neck tonight, a Boston Police sergeant ordered Whole Foods to shut down its first Jamaica Plain community meeting early, after officers arrested two people for unfurling an anti-Whole Foods banner in the back.
As people filed out of the Curley School, police officers from across the city began arriving - the sergeant had activated the department's Emergency Deployment Team system, used to swarm a trouble spot with police. At one point, at least a dozen Boston Police officers (one in plain clothes) stood at the top of the school's steps guarding it against potential mayhem.
No violence actually broke out, although two women on either side of the issue had to be separated by friends when they cursed and then lunged at each other as they were leaving the auditorium.
As the meeting began around 7 p.m., the roughly 200 residents seemed evenly split between people holding up yellow signs in favor of the impending Whole Foods in Hyde Square and people holding blue signs - and many wearing blue T-shirts - in opposition.
A line of Whole Foods executives and managers sat on tall chairs at the front of the auditorium, explaining how they do business and how they hope to open in late fall.
The mostly white, mostly young anti-Fooders quickly began trying to shout down both Whole Foods managers and other residents as they screamed their opposition to what they said was the ultimate gentrifying force that would push the neighborhood's minority residents out.
The mostly white, mostly middle-aged pro-Whole Foods contingent pleaded for civility - but occasionally shouted out demands that the protesters shut up. For the most part, however, they limited their noise making to applauding when somebody made a point with which they agreed.
The yelling reached a fever pitch after Whole Foods finished explaining its wonderfulness and opened the floor to questions. Things quieted down when a Whole Foods executive said if the yelling didn't stop, she'd cut the meeting off there and take any questions by e-mail. Occasional yelling continued, however, as people at the mikes made one point or another. And then Frankel and Murray went up to the auditorium balcony and unfurled a banner:
Both were arrested and led out of the school in handcuffs, to be booked at District E-13 on charges of disturbing a public assembly and trespassing (the third person arrested was taken away as the police were clearing the auditorium).
Meanwhile, a Whole Foods executive explained why the company had waited several months to actually meet with the community:
Whole Foods had reserved the auditorium until 9 p.m. and had planned to start winding things down at 8:30 p.m. to get people out by then, but the sergeant cut things short at 8:15.
As people poured out, some pro-market residents went down the line of Whole Foods employees shaking their hands.
Outside, City Councilor Matt O'Malley, who supports the Whole Foods, said he was disappointed the meeting was cut short and hoped Whole Foods would hold another - and that residents could come to some meeting of the minds. "We all love Jamaica Plain and we all want to be proud of Jamaica Plain," he said.
Several other residents in favor of the market expressed disgust with both the shouting blue shirts and police - they said as much as they disagreed with the protesters' tactics, they were disturbed by the strong-arm nature of the police reaction to a meeting they said had calmed down since its rocky beginning and showed no signs of collapsing into chaos.
At District E-13, a couple dozen protesters gathered to support the three arrested people. At one point, a different police sergeant came out and laid down some rules, including: If they just stood there, as they were doing, they could be arrested, so they had to stay in motion. The protesters quickly began marching in a circle. One protester dashed off to get pizza. They pooled their money to pay the $40 bail processing fee for each of the three.
Around 9:45, the three emerged, one by one, to applause.
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
With all do respect...
By whyaduck
Fri, 06/03/2011 - 1:13pm
as I have said many times before, JP has been moving along the path of gentrification since the 1980s, at least. You should surely realize this since you hint that you have lived in JP longer than 10 years.
Whole Foods is moving into JP because the company believes that they will have a viable business there - i.e. people will shop at the store.
As someone who grew up lower-income and, at times, in poverty, I truly understand and feel passionately about the loss of affordable housing and the lack of affordable health care. I also care about people having jobs and for better or for worse, I rather see a store like WH in that location (which, for the retail industry, is not a bad place to work) that will offer jobs to the community rather than an empty store front.
WH is not the 500 pound gorilla here and I for one would wish people would see that.
Tell me this...
By Sally
Fri, 06/03/2011 - 4:15pm
If there are so many committed Latinos in this ridiculous, now truly embarrassing "movement" trying to keep jobs and healthy food out of a community that sorely needs both, can you please explain to me why you guys can't seem to write a grammatically correct sign in Spanish? Every time I see a new sign or banner it's got some egregious error in it that even I can spot and I can barely read Spanish.
I'm also really curious as to why, in a community with countless challenges including 50% high school dropout rates, skyrocketing youth violence and gang activity, and serious diet-related health issues including obesity and diabetes, you think that joining up with a bunch of guilt-ridden white college kids to fight a supermarket is the worthiest target of your outrage and energy.
don't forget
By anon²
Fri, 06/03/2011 - 5:29pm
The lack of latino's against it at the meeting. If that entire neighborhood demographic is against it, their final say on it was a gigantic "meh".
I think it's more of a case of "I know whats best for the community" then the community actually caring enough to get involved.
Btw...
By Sally
Fri, 06/03/2011 - 4:51pm
Hi Martha. And please, tell us how anyone's voice has been "silenced."
Make Latinos rich enough to stay in JP & shop at Whole Foods
By EM Painter
Tue, 06/07/2011 - 10:36am
solution
The landlord has the right to rent his property to
By anon
Fri, 06/03/2011 - 7:34pm
whomever he wants. So should we try to force him to keep the laundromat there? Maybe we should confiscate his property, and run the laundromat ourselves, because it's convenient to have one there and we like things to be convenient. We live in a free market system, which usually works pretty well. That means various people will like or not like the business ventures that try to make a living in their neighborhood.
this is not a free market
By pierce
Fri, 06/03/2011 - 11:47pm
this is not a free market economy, not by a long shot
Yeah, nothing "fixes" gentrification like joblessness!
By some.nerd
Fri, 06/03/2011 - 12:33pm
You know, the worst thing about this whole protest is that WF actually pays QUITE well for what it is, with honest-to-God BENEFITS for its employees. I sincerely doubt Hi-Lo offered $10+/hr, paid vacation and health insurance to its part-time workers when it was open.
These protesters are friggin' idiots. LET THE STORE OPEN ALREADY AND GET ON WITH YOUR LIVES.
Look at the woman in green in
By JPeter
Fri, 06/03/2011 - 1:37pm
Look at the woman in green in this photo...she's seems to be really into this meeting. I guess she just thought she'd catch a few Zzzzzzz in between childish outbursts and non-sensical banter. hahahaha! :)
http://www.boston.com/yourtown/news/jamaica_plain/...
i am the woman in green ...
By Jess in JP
Fri, 06/03/2011 - 3:27pm
... and I picked the wrong time to close my eyes, I guess. I was at the meeting hoping to hear the dialogue, as many were, (neither to take a nap nor to share outbursts, believe it or not), naively believing that the attention-seekers might actually participate respectfully in the meeting that they have been wanting. I've been following the controversy with mounting disbelief at how things have devolved.
I am looking forward to having the store in the neighborhood and was disgusted and disappointed in all of the disrespectful bullying, heckling, etc., that many others have referred to. It was embarrassing.
So, a cautionary tale - if there are photographers in the room, always be ready for your close-up!
No disrespect meant..I just
By JPeter
Fri, 06/03/2011 - 4:10pm
No disrespect meant..I just thought the picture was really funny..and fitting! Imaginary caption: "attendee's of JP Whole Foods meeting are so tired (literally) of the Anti-Whole Foods campaign it's putting them to sleep!" :)
None taken! Just was hoping
By anon
Fri, 06/03/2011 - 5:42pm
None taken! Just was hoping no one else had noticed :)
But "sick and tired"? You got it!
I feel bad for you.
By anon²
Fri, 06/03/2011 - 5:31pm
I would have had a headache too!
That picture really does it
By anon
Fri, 06/03/2011 - 3:50pm
That picture really does it for me. The blue-shirters all standing up holding the signs. I understand the argument against WF, and they had this meeting to listen and try to explain themselves. But how can you say that the anti-WF don't look like they just wanted to cause a ruckus? An uphill battle gets steeper because of it.
What are the odds that those
By silly hippie
Fri, 06/03/2011 - 1:48pm
What are the odds that those arrested, along with those protesting Whole Foods, don't actually have jobs. "Community Organizer" does not count.
hipster
By central squared
Fri, 06/03/2011 - 2:24pm
If you think those three people in the front of that photo are hipsters, then you need to get out more.
Which picture?
By silly hippie
Fri, 06/03/2011 - 2:40pm
Which picture?
Seriously!
By Whit
Fri, 06/03/2011 - 3:47pm
I have no idea why this comment page always comes down to "hipster" bashing. I am still not even sure what it means. The cute dude looks more like an old fashioned Earth Firsty/anarchist kind of guy and the girl--whose definition of "hipster" would she fall under exactly?
It is by a long shot the most boring and irrlevant factor in this idiotic Whole Foods meltdown.
Whit nailed it
By johnmcloughlin
Fri, 06/03/2011 - 4:13pm
I am not sure which one is the cute one, maybe they're both cute in different ways, but the flannel guy in the front is Andrew Murray, who works at the Lucy Parsons Project (bookstore coming soon to Hyde Square) and is one of the members of the JPNC WF ad hoc comm. The flannel guy in the back really does look like Michael Cera!
Hipsters
By anon²
Fri, 06/03/2011 - 5:38pm
Here you go.
As said, their parents have money, but they usually live in cheap apartments or in communes. Love beards, skinny jeans and anything 80's. Not very political, little bit anarchist, and bleed irony and sarcasm, and bad internet meme's
UHubers seem to be using Hipster interchangeably with whatever they feel like, but it's not them.
May I suggest Green's, or DFH's (dirty fraking hippy). These guys are protesting HF's are way to the left of even liberals.
[img]http://methodmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/...
hi-lo was a complete
By anon
Fri, 06/03/2011 - 6:14pm
hi-lo was a complete sh*thole. anyone who ever attempted to shop there knows this. diversity my ass. good riddens!
Days of yore and YAWF
By daan
Fri, 06/03/2011 - 9:26pm
This reminds me of an argument I inadvertently wound up in with folks from YAWF in the late 70s. None of us knew dit about life (though I suspect I had a better feel for growing up poor and as a member of "the oppressed class" than the folks who grew up in middle class families with two parents, siblings, relatives, etc.
I wonder how much the objection to WF, at least for the so-called leftist folks, is really just an opportunity to flex what little political muscle they possess? I would prefer a supermarket that was locally owned and which resulted in profits staying in the community. But then I can shop at Harvest which accomplishes that goal more than at WF. But I realize that a large profitable corporation such as WF can be used to improve the quality of life in the neighborhood by pulling more money into the neighborhood.
Ironically there was a time when I would be on the side of anti-gentrification. But low and behold I joined the middle class, bought a house and now want gentrification. Would it be better if most people in JP who do not have middle class incomes were to start earning middle class incomes? Is enough energy put toward supporting lower income residents in getting better paying jobs and earning better incomes which could help them also enjoy the benefits of gentrification?
Perhaps there is an economic system that is better than the mess that we have. But being only one person I had to deal with the deck at hand: that meant using a capitalist system. To use that system what I had to do is: 1) get a decent education, 2) find work in a field that pays a decent wage, 3) stay away from folks who want to stay poor, 4) do not do anything that would harm my chances of decent employment (e.g., criminal conviction).
BREAKING: State Police to seek jurisdiction over Boston schools
By O-FISH-L
Sat, 06/04/2011 - 12:38am
Re: Carson Beach Lite
Governor Deval Patrick and State Police Colonel Marian McGovern will seek legislation Monday transferring jurisdiction of the Boston Public Schools to the State Police after what McGovern called "an overreaction" by Boston police who called in the department's Emergency Deployment Team system to quell a minor disturbance at a school during a meeting about Whole Foods. "The Boston Police are good at many things but this case shows they can't handle a community meeting in a school," McGovern said. Administration sources said Governor Patrick was outraged that some of the Boston Police carried department issued batons and wore black gloves. Citing the nearly all white crowd, several Boston Globe columnists immediately suggested racism may have triggered the massive police response. DEVELOPING:::
Pages