The Globe today really puts the news in context. A front page story declaring the worst recession since World War II sits right atop crack investigative reporter Sarah Schweitzer's expose on rich white parents in the South End: South End getting (a lot) younger.
Yes, shocking: Rich white people are taking time out from accumulating wealth to pop out babies!
What has changed, residents say, is that affluent young professionals who once moved away when they planned to have children began about five years ago to stay. Some now are upgrading from smaller, couple-size condos to four-bedroom units that can cost $2 million.
So, hold on, all you yuppies moving to the Natick Mall: Ms. Schweitzer now declares there is life in the old city yet.
However, the story really only continues Schweitzer's - and the Globe's - odd compulsion to turn every little anecdote-based story into some sweeping declaration of a "trend." Is the South End really getting younger? The most recent demographic data on the neighborhood is from the 2000 federal census - in other words, from two years before her alleged trend started.
As Adam Reilly of the Phoenix points out (in e-mail to me, since he can't post to his blog for some reason), there could be another explanation for Schweitzer's anecdotes: Rich white parents (and the stores that cater to them) are displacing poor brown parents in the neighborhood:
In other words, she can't conclusively state that there are more kids than there used to be. But because there are a lot of new upscale options catering to parents with disposable income...QED?
What Schweitzer ignores, obviously, is the possibility that, with the flight of lower- and middle-income families, the neighborhood may have no more kids than it used to, or even less.
Icky poor people? Please. They're Herald readers; we'll have none of that in the New Globe.
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
Oh Gareth, you slay me. =)
By OneMansOpinion
Sun, 03/16/2008 - 4:38pm
my, you're awfully angry! did someone put a starbucks in your neighborhood?
Lets see, where have I lived (in no order)...Brighton, West End, Beacon Hill, Fenway, Brookline Vilage, Coolidge Corner, Los Angeles, Newton. We can't all live the high life of Row Neuman (Hey Ron, how many somerville blogs have you been banned from again? Didn't the Somerville news ban you for over a year?)
You can live in self denial all you want; when you see a report on the news about a crime, please take a note of the person's name, race, and where they live. Then you can turn that high handed, keen power of introspection on yourself.
Wow, you are right! Here is a palace in Rozzie for 289K! Two units, check cashing adjacent!
realtor.com/...&srcnt=46#Detail
Wow, you sure showed me! I am so humbled really!
I am here merely to remind you, of how your idea of social change is to piss and moan about things that are outside of your itty bitty life. For me, this is a random distraction and my civic duty. Though I suppose if the sheep are busy here, they won't be out causing trouble for the real people in the city...think of me as your babysitter. =) After all, someone has to keep the kids in line!
Banned from a blog? No
By Ron Newman
Sun, 03/16/2008 - 4:49pm
I've never been banned from any blog that I know of. Occasionally the Somerville News has deleted a comment of mine, but that happens to lots of people, for both good and bad reasons.
Ball is not Square
By SwirlyGrrl
Sun, 03/16/2008 - 8:05pm
Ball is round!
Now that, is the funniest
By OneMansOpinion
Sun, 03/16/2008 - 8:07pm
Now that, is the funniest and smartest thing I've read here in awhile. =)
Project much?
By Gareth
Mon, 03/17/2008 - 5:47am
"your idea of social change is to piss and moan about things that are outside of your itty bitty life"
And here you are again, pissing and moaning.
See a doctor.
Roslindale is NOT
By panda
Sat, 05/03/2008 - 9:57am
I know you wrote thhat post a long time ago but it still angers me. Roslindale is NOT a crappy area.It has resturants, a supermarket , a church, banks, a little park in the square, barber shops, a train station,ice cream place,everything other neighborhoods have.
And theres absolutley NOTHING wrong with living in the midwest
Chicago is in the midwest.Something bad about living there?
Indanapolis is in the midwest.Something bad about living there?
Who's the nut-job?
By John K
Sun, 03/16/2008 - 7:34pm
What a loser he is. Yikes.
Just a piece of information for anyone still reading this thread (although, why you would be, is beyond me, after comments such as his).
According to a recent of Boston report (warning, PDF), yes, the South End lost Black people between 1990 - 2000.
But, so did ... Roxbury. And, Mattapan.
I don't think it was due to "gentrification" ... right? So, what else was going on?
Obviously, more research would need to be done.
Neighborhoods that saw a large increase in Black population include Hyde Park, Roslindale, and West Roxbury. And, South Dorchester.
Theories?
They are allowed to live elsewhere now
By SwirlyGrrl
Sun, 03/16/2008 - 7:58pm
Gentrification goes a couple of ways. Sometimes it means wealthier people moving in. Sometimes, it is the wealthier people moving out.
For decades, if not centuries, black people were restricted in their neighborhood choices. While those folks may not feel comfortable in all places now, they are not as restricted in their choices as they once were. Like everybody else, blacks want good schools and safe neighborhoods and will move to them as they can afford them. This is a huge demographic influence in places like Atlanta. Thus the shift to tidy, traditional working-class enclaves that used to be nearly exclusively white.
Such as Roslindale and Hyde Park
By adamg
Sun, 03/16/2008 - 8:04pm
Affordable (well, for Boston, anyway) houses, quiet and safe streets and, at least in Roslindale, access to some of the city's better elementary schools (dunno about Hyde Park, which is in a different zone from us). There are definitely more blacks (and Hispanics) on our street now than when we moved here in 1993.
As for West Roxbury, that's just on a percentage basis, right? Because Westie still strikes me as the whitest neighborhood in the city.
Define Lost
By OneMansOpinion
Sun, 03/16/2008 - 8:22pm
If you're talking strictly on a census basis, I assume you're speaking mainly of the little forms they send out once inawhile..which the last time I took one (1999 I think) it seemed most of the questions were trying to make sure I wasn't hispanic, which was kinda confusing because I speak Spanish, and enjoy burritos and corona.
Some of the more interesting things are not what a census says, but what it does not say...like for example, the triple deckers in Charlestown where 30 guatamelans live. Could some of the differences in the year include more honest reporting, as well as deaths, or is that factored into crime rates?
Part of census data which may or may not exist, would be things like the amount of crime in an area, and the racial mix and residency of criminals, or if the population reduced due to people say, being killed, joining the army, etc.
As for the matter at hand, the article we're all talking about and that you townies are all riled up over is barely what I would consider journalism (I didn't realize some anecdotes by some dim broads who can't understanding a parking law or having children within a city may not be as convienent as out in the burbs) and the 'horros of gentrification' that loom in most stories where, to be blunt, a shitty crime ridden area of the city gets better or changes genetic makeup is hardly worth all the hub bub. When my wife used to live in the south end (closed to the Mass Ave end) two things woke us up at night - loud black kids screaming and cursing at each other, or the gay couple upstairs in their 40s arguing and then making up once a week.
Here's a tip - if an area has low property values, people who make less money tend to live there. City services become of shoddy quality, so crime breeds. Is someplace like Somerville full of nightly gang shootouts and crack vials? I don't think so. Does it having some good ethnic restaurants or some crappy farmers market make it a great city? No, I don't think so either. Is it someplace I'd want to live and send my kids to school in? Nope. That doesn't mean you shouldn't. Is a starbucks or higher priced condos the end of the world and the oppression of the brown people? Nope.
You live in a city full of promise and social issues - the difference between here and say, LA, is that people like to pretend there are no racial tensions, race issues, or biases. So all the lilly white people who try to act all PC and bleeding heart can go back to their starbucks on their metrosexual macbooks or live in their crappy duplexes in parts of town I wouldn't visit and feel all smug and all good about themselves, but at the end of the day, try to make your own life better before you try to get outraged about people who, frankly, could care less about you.
As for me? Well, I've been blessed, so I do my part for race relations - I married an Asian girl. ;)
Please..
By MattL
Sun, 03/16/2008 - 8:14pm
It's getting to the point where it seems like you're really reaching to find new ways to criticize the Globe.
Oh, no
By adamg
Sun, 03/16/2008 - 8:20pm
I haven't brought up "Red and Rover" yet.
Mother says she didn't leave kid alone in car
By adamg
Tue, 03/18/2008 - 9:37pm
Check out the editor's note the Globe has put on the story.
its true!
By Anonymous
Tue, 03/18/2008 - 9:38pm
i live in the south end and it is true. its no longer an affordable gay heaven. the gay bookstores are gone. all but one gay bar left. tons of SUV sized strollers and skinny white moms running around with starbucks in their hands.
City Takes 7 Months to Reverse Trend of Families Moving Out
By Michael Pahre
Tue, 03/18/2008 - 11:09pm
Just seven months ago, the Boston Globe Magazine reported that while upscale people were migrating back to live in the city, families with children were moving out ("The Departing", 8/30/07):
It is nice to see that the Globe has managed to reverse that trend -- or at least their reporting of a so-called trend -- by claiming that the South End is now awash in families with children ("South End getting (a lot) younger", 3/15/08):
From anecdote to trend to urban legend... to being debunked.
Do Globe reporters read each others' stories?
Not that I'd like to defend
By Gareth
Wed, 03/19/2008 - 5:29am
Glob writers who spin anecdotes into trends, but a stroller invasion is not inconsistent with family flight. If they're in strollers, they're too young for school. Perhaps when they are five and six, their moms will no longer think the South End is so golden.
Maybe the stroller invasion will turn tail and run as soon as it's bicycle time, and the South End will be home to only the newly married and the nearly buried.
Or perhaps the moms are so rich that they had private school in the plans from day one, and they won't blink an eye. Either way, you can bet on a follow-up from the front page lifestyle section, based on a single anecdote.
South End under attack by rich white people having babies
By David Dzidzikashvili
Thu, 03/20/2008 - 1:02pm
"Rich white people are taking time out from accumulating wealth to pop out babies"
I guess this will be our new Social Security & pension plan, have lots of babies, raise them and then depend on them financially. Worked for past 21 centuries (and more) in history...
I find this to be funny. The
By Tod
Thu, 03/20/2008 - 1:38pm
I find this to be funny. The South End to me is still a crime ridden area. no matter how many coats of paint you slap on it, It is, what it is. funny thing is 20 years ago many of those houses were going for $9000, No one in their right mind would live there. til this day I still hold on to that opinion.
Marginal people leave
By wellbasically
Thu, 03/20/2008 - 3:00pm
The phenomenon of people on the margin leaving has been widely followed. For instance you have super-expensive restaurants and crummy pizza shops, but no diners or hamburger joints.
In addition, bigger kids need bigger spaces to play. Little parks are not so bad for babies, and they're right there, you don't have to drive.
Finally the same people who are noisy college students, then party outside all night all summer as a young professionals, then make a mess in the restaurant with the baby and the cheerios, well they've lived their whole life disconnected from their environment. They go when the going gets rough, and that's some kind of change in behavior?
The Globe could have been right in both
By Anonymous
Thu, 03/20/2008 - 3:32pm
articles. The former, stating that the young families were moving out of Boston, could have been correct, perhaps if it referred to the city of Boston as a whole.
The latter article also could have been correct if the South End was one part of Boston that was going against the trend of young families moving out.
Either way, I am sure the young white rich families in the South End will move on when it is time for school, or they'll opt for private schools.
Pages