Who's right? The dude sitting on the T eating a bagel with peanut butter or the woman telling him to knock it off because of people with peanut allergies?
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:Who's right? The dude sitting on the T eating a bagel with peanut butter or the woman telling him to knock it off because of people with peanut allergies?
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:Copyright by Adam Gaffin and by content posters.
Advertise | About Universal Hub | Contact | Privacy
Comments
I live in Cambridge
By bobmetcalf
Mon, 03/31/2008 - 9:01pm
And have often wondered whether my daughter
bringing a peanut butter sandwich to public school
would be classified as a hate crime, or as a
violation of the weapons policy.
And don't get me started on 'fluff....
When peanut butter is
By Anonymous
Mon, 03/31/2008 - 9:02pm
When peanut butter is outlawed....
Actually, you're not
By Anonymous
Mon, 03/31/2008 - 9:09pm
Actually, you're not supposed to eat on the T at all. Peanut butter or anything else. Nobody pays any attention to it, of course, but it is the rule.
Still, it's dang inconsiderate, knowing how severe that allergy can be. How would he feel seeing someone go into anaphylaxis? Considering the T can't even help someone with a heart attack, you could pretty well write them off.
Where have you seen that?
By SwirlyGrrl
Mon, 03/31/2008 - 9:50pm
I do know that it is illegal to eat while driving, at least it was in Mass about 20 years or so ago. That may have changed, but I doubt it.
I don't think I've ever seen the same sort of "no eating" signs that I've seen in DC, Portland, Seattle, Chicago, NYC on the T - perhaps they started posting them and noone noticed?
In any case, people with peanut allergies know the scene and act accordingly. If it isn't a peanut butter sandwich contaminating things, it is a peanut-oil contaminated cleaning solution, etc. Everything is nuts. If your allergies are so bad that you cannot touch anything peanut, you won't be riding the T anyway - too many consumer and industrial products, some biodiesel formulations, etc. to be safe anywhere but a bubble, really.
Otherwise, most peanut allergic people can be around peanuts, they just cannot eat them. If they don't lick the poles and seats, there will be no problems.
So I'd say that the scolding woman was just an ignorant busybody on crusade. Either that or I should start sniping at people eating sushi on the train (salmon) and demand that all of the nut carts be located further away from the stations and any prailine eating result in decontamination before I board.
peanut allergies
By o_brien
Wed, 04/02/2008 - 8:36am
If you are not a medical professional, please do not dispense medical advice. That is simply ignorant.
That's Dr. SwirlyWoman to you!
By SwirlyGrrl
Wed, 04/02/2008 - 10:01am
I am a public health professional with a ScD in Environmental Epidemiology. I did a fair amount of my graduate coursework through Harvard Medical School while working as a researcher on asthma studies. :P
In that case
By Anonymous
Wed, 04/02/2008 - 10:26am
If you are a medical professional, please do dispense medical advice. That is simply well-informed.
Furthermore
By Michael
Wed, 04/02/2008 - 10:38am
If you are one of the new hot dog vending machines at Fenway, please dispense hot dogs. They are simply delicious at a ballgame.
Illegal to eat on the T?
By confused
Mon, 03/31/2008 - 9:39pm
Illegal to eat on the T? Then why are there food stalls on the train platforms at Government Center?
So people can buy
By SwirlyGrrl
Mon, 03/31/2008 - 9:40pm
So people can buy cigarettes. ;-)
He didn't say illegal
By BStu
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 9:18am
He said you're not supposed to. They always had signs about not eating on the trains on the Green Line. Maybe they disappeared, but they definitely used to be there. I don't think you'll get arrested for that, but there are rules that don't carry legal weight.
What about spitting?
By adamg
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 9:26am
When I was a kid (back in pre-history), the New York subways were littered with signs warning you not to spit. Were there similar signs up here?
No spitting
By Ron Newman
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 9:31am
Somewhere I know I've seen a very old photo of Boylston station with a "NO SPITTING" sign.
Did you know that the MTA used to have special cars for smokers, at least on the Orange Line?
No spitting
By eeka not logged in
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 9:34am
There was a NO SPITTING sign on the elevated green line platform at North Station up until it was closed.
Every Station Had Them
By Suldog
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 11:24am
As I recall, from those days of my youth when dinosaurs sometimes roamed the tracks, there were "NO SPITTING" signs in every station. The reason for the signs wasn't because of what you would think, the obvious grossness factor. They were an attempt to stop the spread of tuberculosis. It was far more common in the days when the subway began.
Suldog
http://jimsuldog.blogspot.com
There is no rule against eating on the T
By Ron Newman
Mon, 03/31/2008 - 9:43pm
If there were such a rule, the T would not have food vendors inside the pay gates at Government Center, Copley, Lechmere, Downtown Crossing, and probably a bunch of other stations that I can't remember right now.
I have to admit that I've eaten peanut-butter crackers lots of times on the T without even thinking about the allergy issue.
Anonymous probably confused
By Arborway
Mon, 03/31/2008 - 10:44pm
Anonymous probably confused the T with the Washington DC Metro. (no laughing, please)
I remember that eating was
By Chris
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 9:09am
I remember that eating was once prohibited on the T - there used to be signs on the train.
Oh Yum! I haven't had a
By Anonymous
Mon, 03/31/2008 - 9:31pm
Oh Yum! I haven't had a peanut butter bagel in so long..
tomorrow morning!
don't nobody get in my way, yo. bagel time is ME TIME.
Chunky style, or smooth?
By Dave
Mon, 03/31/2008 - 9:37pm
Chunky style, or smooth?
Chunky hippy style
By SwirlyGrrl
Mon, 03/31/2008 - 9:46pm
Half-drained, well stirred, with honey and raisins.
mmmmmmm.
I used to think
By DJDiva
Mon, 03/31/2008 - 10:09pm
That peanut butter allergies were kind of silly, and then one day I opened a jar of peanut butter in my house not knowing that my roommate's boyfriend was THAT allergic to peanut butter. He immediately broke out in hives and his throat started to close up. He left the house and used his epi pen. I felt extremely bad about it. I thought he just couldn't eat peanut butter - I didn't realize even the smell in the air could create the reaction. Now I am much more sensitive to peanut allergies. So knowing this I think it's probably wise not to eat peanut butter in a public place - like a train.
It isn't just food, though
By SwirlyGrrl
Mon, 03/31/2008 - 10:32pm
I'm not saying that there aren't people who are that allergic to peanut butter. What I doubt is that they would use the T - and not because people eat peanut butter on the T, either.
Peanut oil and peanut-derived products are everywhere. If you have such extreme allergies, you probably wouldn't be on the T because of all the non-food things that contain peanuts - cosmetics, lubricants, plastics, cleaning solutions, etc.
Most are not even labeled - a little girl in the kindergarten at my son's school was taken away by ambulance because she handled a gummi bear. The peanut wasn't in the gummi bear and the candy did not list peanuts or any nut warning on the label. The girl didn't eat it anyway, because the teacher stopped her.
Turns out that the manufacturer used a molding release agent that contained a peanut oil derivative.
Deity of choice only knows what cleaning or lubricating stuff made in China is going to have in it or where it might end up on the T!
it's just scary
By DJDiva
Mon, 03/31/2008 - 10:34pm
it's kind of scary though that all these products have some residue of peanut butter in them - I am glad I don't have a peanut allergy.
Choosy Web designers
By adamg
Mon, 03/31/2008 - 9:58pm
Choose GIF.
And, yes, I know that was an awful joke even back in 1996.
Making puns like that is
By cantabrigiana
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 12:42am
Making puns like that is trying to fit a square jpeg into a round hole. (hides)
Oooh!
By adamg
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 7:40am
Good one!
Stop it
By Gareth
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 8:26am
You guys will have a tiff about anything.
Any more to this thread?
By SwirlyGrrl
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 9:58am
bmp
Remind me in a couple days
By adamg
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 10:00am
Yeah, png me.
These image file puns
By Kaz
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 11:37am
...are rubbing me raw.
Hey buddy,
By Brett
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 1:56pm
you better zip it. Tar and feather me if you like, but gz, com on.
pst, did you hear about that grenade? They thought it was a bom.
Why are you bashing me?
By adamg
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 2:14pm
What sort of shell game you running there? I didn't have you fingerd for that sort.
Zsh!
By Brett
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 4:57pm
Can't anyone take a joke? Less is more, sed the WYSE man.
And hwclock --hctosys, cause that joke of yours was so epoch, yo. Don't make me bust a quota in your tail.
I can't top that
By adamg
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 5:15pm
I feel so awkward.
That's Okay ...
By SwirlyGrrl
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 5:29pm
They're all just dBase-ing themselves
sh! ssh!
By Dave
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 5:42pm
Get a grep on yourself, man. What's the diff anyway?
Don't respond
By Gareth
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 5:42pm
You're casting perls before swine.
There isn't a kernel of truth in any of this!
By bobmetcalf
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 5:51pm
It's all a pipe dream, and it defines the
standard for error.
These are awful!
By SwirlyGrrl
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 7:56pm
I'll have to sql this thread away for future reference.
Let's never do this again
By Gareth
Wed, 04/02/2008 - 4:28am
I'm not looking forward to the sql.
me 2
By Anonymous
Mon, 03/31/2008 - 10:19pm
> So I'd say that the scolding woman was just an ignorant busybody on crusade.
What about Charlie?
By timlav
Mon, 03/31/2008 - 10:27pm
The song says his wife would meet him every day at Government Center to hand him a sandwich. I presume he had to eat it on the train. Perhaps he was grandfathered as a pre-existing, nonconforming condition.
I think the CharlieCard image even is a take-off on that part of the song mentioned above. At least that's the part of the song the image brings to mind. Instead of a sandwich, he's holding a CharlieCard.
LOL!
By nickvdk
Mon, 03/31/2008 - 10:46pm
I was going to take the sandwich-eaters side, but the injudicious use of "LOL" forces me to take hers.
That reminds me...
By jmr76
Mon, 03/31/2008 - 11:00pm
Its PEANUT BUTTER JELLY TIME!
http://youtube.com/watch?v=s8MDNFaGfT4
Ahhh - a blast from the past of the Intertubes
Fun trivia about peanut allergies
By Brett
Mon, 03/31/2008 - 11:53pm
...it's mostly treatable. Both with medication, and by building up resistance. You need only be exposed to small but ever so slightly increasing doses, until your body doesn't flip out- obviously for some people the minimum dose is gonna be pretty small, but it's still possible. Been largely proven to work with almost anything people are allergic to, too.
Harper's hit these freaks hard
By Marc Larocque
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 12:02am
Read this delightful explanation of the enormous exaggeration of food alergies. Kiss of death! Also, listed below is a link to the letters and response from the writer Meredith Broussard .
http://www.harpers.org/archive/2008/01/0081878
http://www.harpers.org/archive/2008/03/page/0008
Subscription only
By Allstonian
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 9:53am
The link to the original article works, but the second link, to the letters, is subscription-only.
A T train is big
By Kaz
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 1:02am
Even a green line train gives you enough room that you can get far enough from peanut butter that it wouldn't be an issue.
Also, who cares if he's eating peanut butter? Someone with an allergy. Let them tell him he's about to give them a medical emergency.
To yell at someone for creating some sort of high risk situation for some sort of hypothetical peanut-allergic person who isn't even present to complain...
is..
nuts.
They might not be able to
By BStu
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 9:22am
If they are having a potentially fatal allergic reaction in an enclosed space they can't leave, they might be busy trying desperately not to die to request someone not kill them.
Then change T policy
By SwirlyGrrl
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 10:05am
Again: if somebody is that allergic to peanuts, they probably won't be on the T anyway.
That's because they should know that people eat on the T, and people eat away from the T and then take their peanut-butter covered hands and touch things. Or feed their kid pbar sandwiches and then board. Same thing.
I doubt even the metro in DC is peanut safe for those reasons.
In any case, the problem isn't a person eating a sandwich - it is the T policy that permits and encourages that. Nagging people for what they are perfectly entitled to do and not because you yourself are threatened makes you a busybody ninny. Go after the illegal smokers on the platforms if you must, but the rest is just the new "I'm more moral and sensitive than you" trip.
That bagel eater had every right to eat on the T. Get the rules changed if you disagree.
Fantasy T policies
By BStu
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 10:43am
The T isn't encouraging you to bring food on the trains. They are offering you the opportunity to buy food on your way out of the station.
Eating in a cramped, enclosed space where people don't have the option to leave if they don't like it isn't a right. Its rude. Its disrespectful to the other riders and to the people forced to clean your mess. We shouldn't need rules for people to not behave in a rude and arrogant manner. The MBTA wouldn't enforce them anyway. Again, this used to be a posted rule and may still be an unposted rule that no one tries to do anything about. Legislating politeness is inherently difficult. Which is why social pressure should be used to push the very few people who treat the T like a rolling McDonalds to be respectful to others.
If the T...
By Michael
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 10:51am
...gave two shits about manners and civility, they wouldn't have wired the tunnels downtown for cell phone reception.
I agree... BUT...
By Tammy
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 11:44am
A few comments. I agree that this woman was over the line in accosting the person with the PBnJ. And I also agree that if you or your child has a peanut allergy that is so severe, that you will most likely (hopefully) take special care in avoiding areas where you could be exposed to such products.
That said... there is a reason why most airlines no longer serve peanuts. One of our best friends has a daughter that is severely allergic to peanuts. A few years back, before peanuts were banned from planes, they flew with her. Halfway through the flight, their daughter's face starting breaking out and she started getting an itchy throat. As it turns out, she put her cheek on the arm of the chair to rest her head and obviously the last person who sat there had eaten peanuts.
Granted, they could have cleaned the seat first... but my point is, no matter how big the T is and how far away from a person you are, you can still have an allergic reaction. So... the woman SHOULD have complained to the MBTA and asked that they consider banning peanuts, rather that harrassing the individual -- who probably has NO idea just how allergic a person can be.
The Eating Issue
By OneMansOpinion
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 9:35am
I've always found people eating on the T distateful. Sure, having a closed container like coffee or tea or a soda seems ok, but then you consider how much of that gets left behind in the T car for people to either sit on or get picked up, it goes to show you that some people are just inconsiderate pigs. If you are in such a rush that you have to eat in public, wake up five minutes earlier.
Eating peanut crackers on the T? What are you, 3 years old?
I'm surprised with all the self entitlement around here, someone hasn't tried to prohibit or limit consumption on the T. Then again, there are no smoking signs at every T stop but people still smoke along the Green line. The only way to actually have people pay attention to these rules is to ENFORCE them. I'd rather see a T cop out there ticketing people for smoking or eating then in riot gear over at Savin Hill because two homies decided to have a throw down, but hey thats just me.
People living in the cradle of freedoom sometimes are woefully ignorant. As a bystander, I do pick up trash now and again as I'm getting off the T; of course most of the time that is BostonNow or the Metro. If people are so outraged against yellow books, why tolerate one garbage newspaper, let alone two? Anyhow, that's just...one man's opinion. ;)
The bagel eater is wrong
By BStu
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 9:38am
First off, its rude to be eating on the T. I don't care how busy you are. Trains are tight, enclosed spaces and eating on them is bound to be rude and insensitive to your fellow riders. The T isn't a kitchen or a dining room. You want to eat, bring that bagel into work and eat at your desk. Or at least eat it while walking on the streets. In an enclosed space, its just horribly rude to force strangers into being at your kitchen table. Or force them to BE your kitchen table if you make a mess as I've often seen people do. The polite and respectful thing to do is not eat there.
Look, we're talking about a subway or trolly. This isn't a train or bus you'll be on for hours. Those modes of transportation are also designed to allow for some small level of privacy in the seats so its not nearly as rude as doing it on commuter transit. We're also not talking about something harmless. I figure, if you'd need to wash something to clean it if your food dropped, it doesn't belong on a crowded (or even potentially crowded) train. I'm pretty certain you can't wipe off peanut butter and be good to go. Its disgusting and disrespectful.
Beyond all that, though, the woman who told him to stop might have a close friend or family member with severe peanut allergies and is sensitive to those issues. They may have wanted this person to be aware of that, and how they are putting their desires over the safety of other people. And since the bagel eater was being rude in the first place, I don't think her taking it upon herself to say that is rude. I don't think the bagel eater was trying to hurt anyway, but they were being rude and self-important to use the T as their kitchen table.
I don't know
By DJDiva
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 10:54am
Why anyone would actually want to eat on the T anyway. The T is nasty and just plain dirty. Why would someone want to eat a sandwich or bagel on it anyway? I don't necessarily think it's rude to eat on a train (although I do think folks should be sensitive to allergies), I just think it's disgusting. Your hands are touching handrails etc that who knows when - if ever - they were washed, and then are touching a sandwich? No thanks. I prefer to eat food at a clean table after I wash my hands.
Time Issue
By SwirlyGrrl
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 11:44am
I know people who had to eat on the T because they were running job to job, job to class, etc.
The T's tenuous grip on the term "schedule" doesn't help either. You can't go grab a bite somewhere when you have no idea when any of three horrendously off-schedule buses are going to turn up all at once.
Please don't eat on the T!
By Allstonian
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 11:12am
I'm with the folks who think that eating on the T is rude, especially when it's crowded. I admit that in my teens I did eat on buses and streetcars all the time, but I stopped after a ride on a jam-packed B Line car when a woman standing over me (I was seated) was eating a pita sandwich and DROPPING ALFALFA SPROUTS INTO MY OPEN TOTE BAG! When I reacted she made a halfhearted apology but continued to munch - apparently it was my job to get my goods out of the way of her falling food waste. Ugh. I realized the error of my own way and swore off the practice. (I did eat on the commuter rail when I had to go straight from work to dance practice for a couple of years, but only when I had no seatmate, and I was always careful to avoid leaving crumbs or scraps behind.)
I'm sure that all of you
By Anonymous
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 11:33am
I'm sure that all of you posters disgusted by people eating on the T would never use a cell phone in public and abuse us with your private discussions - IT'S SO FREAKIN' RUDE! That's right, I'm sure....
And your point is...?
By Allstonian
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 11:47am
As a matter of fact, I don't use my cell phone in public much. I stick to texting if I'm on the bus, or in the rare case where I *must* make a call, I keep it extremely brief - usually something like "Hi, it's me, I'm on my way." I can count the number of times that I've made voice calls on the bus in the past five years on one hand. (For one thing, frankly, I have a pretty low-tech cell phone and I can't hear at all well on it in a noisy public environment like a bus. Which is fine by me.)
My big manners peeves that I wish the T would fight with a poster/announcement campaign: folks who sit in the stairwells on Green Line cars (blocking doorways on the older cars and the corridor on the Bredas), and those who put their feet on empty seats.
Thank you for your
By Anonymous
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 12:32pm
Thank you for your restraint, limited use of you cell phone in public.
I miss phone booths because they insulted us from being subject to personal conversations such as picking up a loaf of bread, how much one loves the other, and "guess where I am now!" Shouldn't the private lives of others be carried out in private?
And another thing, why did god give people with cell phones the loudest voices?
A phone booth
By adamg
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 12:37pm
The 50's Diner in Dedham has one. They took out the actual payphone because not enough people were using it to make it worth the phone company's while, but now people go in it with a cellphone sometimes and close the door.
of course that's "insulated"
By Anonymous
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 12:42pm
of course that's "insulated" not "insulted" ...but sometimes a cigar is more that a cigar
Doyle's in JP
By Ron Newman
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 12:45pm
Last time I was in Doyle's, they still had a phone booth. I don't remember if they still had a payphone in the booth.
I try not, but its still not the same thing.
By BStu
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 12:12pm
After all, people talk on the train all the time. A phone call is ultimately just one side of those conversations. As long as a person is mindful not to shout, they aren't doing anything unusual. Its a far cry from treating the train like a cafeteria. I won't go into a McDonald's and scold people for eating there, because its appropriate THERE.
The real objections
By Kaz
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 12:02pm
The real objections here seem to be about crudeness and consideration. Food waste left on the T is littering. Someone dropping food into your bag is an asshole. The same way that it is possible to have a private phone conversation at a reasonably soft level on the train, there are ways to eat something on the subway that are not intrusive on the average fellow passenger. The problem isn't with the fact that a person is eating, just like the problem isn't that someone is making a phone call. It's how considerate they are in how they act in a crowd.
For example, someone trying to eat a sloppy joe in a capacity green line train is wrong to do so. Someone eating a candy bar (and placing the wrapper back in their bag/pocket) in a half empty red line car is not going to be an issue.
Shades of grey. Since it's reasonable to expect that someone might have a food or drink on the T, people will just have to act with courtesy towards each other. If the guy is making no mess with peanut butter and bread, then chastising him for eating his sandwich with the idea that a hypothetical "someone" might have a severe peanut reaction is not reasonable. Only 1% of children had any sort of peanut allergy in a 2003 medical prevalence survey. On top of that, 25% of all children with the allergy grow out of it as an adult. That leaves, what, 0.75% of the adult population or something like that? Clearly this is a case of "if someone says they're allergic and can't move away from you, then be considerate and wait to have your peanut butter".
What if I don't even have my food out? What if I just picked up a nice Thai Satay and it's steaming peanut oils out of the bag I'm carrying it home in? That same hypothetical person is going to have issues and I'm not even eating anything! Do I have to walk home if I purchase anything that might be an allergen? Peanuts, fish, perfumes, oils, scents, soaps, pet dander...all possible allergens. Who would ride the T? Guys who just got off work at the BL4 lab at BUMC and microchip manufacturers who both work in cleansuits?
My point is that if we all act considerately, we can eat, drink, and be merry on the T regardless of the minor risks to some others that can be met, again, with consideration on a case-by-case basis.
Very Well Said
By Suldog
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 1:25pm
Nice analysis, Kaz.
Suldog
http://jimsuldog.blogspot.com
I'm with you on this one!
By Route 66
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 12:09pm
Eating on the T is just unsightly. I've witnessed people spreading out over two seats and really delving in on it. Plus, didn't your mother ever tell you it was impolite to eat in front of others when you didn't have enough for everyone else????
And while we're on this, let's add those who think nothing of completing their morning toilette on the train going to work. Get up 30 minutes earlier and put your face on at home!
BTW: Eating and drinking on Muni trains and buses here in San Francisco is strictly verboten. None of the subway stations have coffee/food outlets to tempt you and aside from a few smarty-pants kids on the streetcars after school, I've yet to see anyone do it. Plus, Muni officers conduct random surprise inspections checking for passes and transfers. Open drink containers or eating will get you a ticket just as fare evasion will.
Etiquette question? Nope, it's all about convenience!!!
By David Dzidikashvili
Tue, 04/01/2008 - 12:12pm
When you're a busy individual with no time to have a decent breakfast in the morning, you utilize every possible free second or minute you have, whether on a T or Bus. I know people who work so hard, sometimes they just realize at the end of the day, they forgot they had not anything to eat.
Pages