An Allston man faces drunk-driving charges after police found him and his car on the tracks at North Station early this morning, the Suffolk County District Attorney's office reports.
Matthias Grenon, 22, somehow got on the commuter-rail tracks near the train-repair facility in Somerville, then headed inbound on the tracks without slipping off until he pulled into the station around 2:20 a.m., the DA's office says. He stayed on the tracks, which cross the Charles River, despite a blood-alcohol level measured at 0.19, more than twice the legal limit, according to the DA's office.
His only explanation for his presence on the commuter rail tracks was that he was trying to get to Cambridge.
According to the DA's, office, when T cops arrived at the station, they:
Found a silver Toyota RAV4 stuck between two sets of commuter rail tracks at the station and Grenon retrieving a cigarette from the vehicle. Officers observed that Grenon was unsteady on his feet, smelled strongly of alcohol, and had glassy, bloodshot eyes.
The DA's office adds:
A Keolis employee told police that he had earlier taken note of Grenon’s vehicle and its license plate number after it allegedly drove dangerously close to a work crew in the area of the Prison Point Bridge; he later observed the same vehicle driving on the commuter rail tracks in the direction of North Station. The witness followed the vehicle on foot for approximately a half mile, until the vehicle became lodged in between two sets of tracks just prior to the platform at North Station.
Prosecutors asked for bail of $1,000 at his arraignment today in Boston Municipal Court on charges of operating under the influence and negligent operation. Judge Thomas Horgan released Grenon on his own recognizance with orders that he not consume alcohol and not drive without a valid license.
Innocent, etc.
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
We have our Drunk
By bulgingbuick
Fri, 10/31/2014 - 7:07pm
of the Year Award winner.
Wonder if he drank
By roadman
Fri, 10/31/2014 - 7:09pm
one too many "Slippery Rails"
Sad thing is ...
By SwirlyGrrl
Fri, 10/31/2014 - 7:34pm
He was probably far less likely to actually kill someone other than himself by taking the rails.
And that's sad ... how?
By Bill Smelly Chuck
Sun, 11/02/2014 - 8:42pm
That's the way it should be. Drunk drivers putting only themselves in danger. If only that were always the case with them.
GPS?
By SBer
Fri, 10/31/2014 - 7:35pm
Was use of a GPS involved????
Booooooooooo! I mean Boo!
By Ralph
Fri, 10/31/2014 - 7:38pm
Booooooooooo! I mean Boo!
Ok now,
By Neal
Sat, 11/01/2014 - 3:05am
This is when it's appropriate for one to make a cocktail joke. Not like the last time someone did here...
It's true:
By bibliotequetres...
Fri, 10/31/2014 - 7:41pm
God loves drunks.
Not sure he "loves" them
By anon
Fri, 10/31/2014 - 8:22pm
But he looks over them, and children.
Who else will?
"...negligent operation."
By anonism
Fri, 10/31/2014 - 7:49pm
"...negligent operation."
Any chance that same court can have a hearing of such charges against the MBTA some time this century?
Any idea how the police got the car off the tracks?
By Ron Newman
Fri, 10/31/2014 - 10:03pm
I assume they did not drive it back over the rails to Somerville.
Might have been accidental damage to the vehicle
By Markk02474
Sat, 11/01/2014 - 12:40am
in the process of removing it.
If he was drunk while driving on private property instead of a public road, can he be charged with DUI, or just trespassing?
He'd have to argue that he
By SRD
Sat, 11/01/2014 - 8:05am
He'd have to argue that he entered the private property sober, then proceeded to get drunk.
I'm not sure the tracks, etc. are considered private property anyway. But I don't know.
Not Private
By BostonDog
Sat, 11/01/2014 - 12:40pm
The tracks and land is owned by the MBTA, aka, the Commonwealth.
yes, private
By anon
Sat, 11/01/2014 - 1:53pm
As signs all over the place remind you: MBTA property is "private" property and if you're where you shouldn't be, or without a fare, etc - you are trespassing.
They even cite the law on the signs...
Must be driving on a "public way"
By dirtywater77
Sat, 11/01/2014 - 2:53pm
One element of OUI is that you must be driving on a public way, i.e. a place where the public is allowed to drive. The public is not allowed to drive down the MBTA tracks into North Station. So I wonder why they didn't charge this in Middlesex, where the actual roads are that lead onto the railroad tracks. Unless they left some significant info out of the press release.
There is another statute.....
By Pete Nice
Sun, 11/02/2014 - 11:51am
But since people did witness his car on a public way there is probable cause to charge him with this.
The other statute has to do with any vehicle on any land (atv in a park) or something like that. Same penalties I believe off the top of my head.
He's going to have some story to tell
By jmeltzer
Sat, 11/01/2014 - 12:25pm
back at the frat house.
And to parents.
Add comment