Hey, there! Log in / Register
Man admits role in sale of historic diary stolen from Old South Church
Support Universal Hub
Help keep Universal Hub going. If you like what we're up to and want to help out, please consider a (completely non-deductible) contribution.
Comments
Confusing Summary
Is this saying that the bookstore unknowingly purchased a stolen book for $750 only to have someone steal the check they wrote and cash it? Did they also catch the person who stole it in the first place and was that the same person who they initially made the $750 check out to?
Theft aside, it seems strange the bookstore would be willing to spend $750 for a antique book without researching its history first. From the summery it sounds like they had some idea of its value when they purchased it which is why they were able to later sell it for $40k.
Glad to hear the book made it back to it's rightful owner.
EDIT: Fixed spelling, thanks.
Summary. Sorry, had to.
Summary. Sorry, had to.
- Perp stole the book
- Perp stole the book
- perp sells it to the bookstore for $750, gives him a check
- perp cashes the check with a license that's not his (probably at a check cashing place), presumably to hide his identity that he was the thief
- book store sells the book for $40k
- book store realizes it's stolen, buys it back from the person they sold it to
But the Feds aren't charging him with the theft of the book
Either there's no proof of the perp committing the theft? Or he cashed the check on behalf of the thief?
Might be difficult in proving
Might be difficult in proving how he got it. He cashed the check with someone else's id, that's illegal.
Could get 5 years?
How about "will" get 5 years! What a jerk.
More like
"should" get five years. Unfortunately, that's up to a judge to decide.