Hey, there! Log in / Register

Flight attendant to get new trial on charge she left a false bomb threat on a plane at Logan

A federal appeals court ruled today a judge had used an incorrect definition of "malice" in jury instructions and so ordered a new trial for Nancy Gray, an American Airlines flight attendant sentenced to 27 months in federal prison for leaving a note on a plane about to take off that there was a bomb on board.

Gray's conviction on a charge of "providing false information regarding a bomb threat on an airplane" required proving she acted maliciously. In a 2-1 decision, the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in Boston debated just what that means:

[C]an malice's fifty shades of meaning include "improper motive?" Former flight attendant Nancy Gray, convicted of providing false information regarding a bomb threat on an airplane, seeks to convince us that she was denied a fundamentally fair trial when her jury was instructed that malice meant "evil purpose or improper motive." Because we find that the district court's definition just won't fly, we vacate Gray's conviction and remand this case for a new trial.

According to the decision, Gray confessed to scrawling "Bomb on Board! BOS-MIA" on the inside of a lavatory storage compartment on Flight 1318, about to depart Logan on Sept. 30, 2009. She later confessed to the FBI, but denied she meant any harm to American Airlines and only wanted to prank the airport worker responsible for cleaning the lavatories, whom she claimed had called her "a fucking bitch."

The appeals court determined that the judge in the case, as requested by Gray's lawyer, should have told the jury that that means something done with "an evil purpose or motive" instead of adding they could also find her actions malicious even if they were just done with "improper motive," which is a lower standard. Prosecutors argued they both mean pretty much the same thing, so the conviction should stand, but the court disagreed, "because jury instructions demand somewhat greater precision than that required by horseshoes and hand grenades."

Complete opinion.

Topics: 
Free tagging: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

I think to myself that maybe I want to be a federal judge when I grow up.

Here's another classic - maybe the best I've ever read. The fun begins in the fourth paragraph. Enjoy!

up
Voting closed 0

Sounds like some judge was totally sick of a couple of perpetual fratboys.

up
Voting closed 0

The famous "it was just a joke" defense.

Then again, Dukakis was never arrested for his "joke" about bombs in flight.

up
Voting closed 0

up
Voting closed 0

Well Elmer how can you say that about her? I have followed this case and done some research and that is not the case at all. Everyone needs to look into the facts (ALL) the facts of this case, not just what they want to provide.

up
Voting closed 0

up
Voting closed 0

Hey how about we give the lady a break? She was never in trouble, and really what was her motive and pay out? I remember reading she recant and the FBI threatened her. Now we all know they accuse innocent people for the crimes. I am just saying.

up
Voting closed 0

Last I checked, innocent people don't write bomb threats in bathrooms, even as "a joke".

up
Voting closed 0

People who are bullied by the FBI will say anything to get them off there back. She was falsely accused and told them she didn't write it. It doesn't add up that after all this time in her life she would lose everything and go to prison. For what? I believe she did not write it. They do not give everyone all the facts.

up
Voting closed 0

The story states that Ms. Gray is indeed going to receive a new trial. If someone else was responsible for scrawling the bomb threat message, there'll be another chance for that evidence to be presented in court.

Are you suggesting she was framed by the cleaning attendant? If Ms. Gray is truly innocent of any crime, then I certainly hope she is exonerated.

up
Voting closed 0

From the research I have done, she and the cleaner had no words what so ever. The FBI set her up. There is a lot to the case they do not want people to see. She has already served her time. She deserves to be exonerated and then some. She is a very humble and kind lady. There was another suspect but the FBI just wanted to close the case and blame anyone they can. I will pray for her as well.

up
Voting closed 0