In a city full of college students, in a world full of increasingly realistic fake licenses, restaurants and bars face a never ending battle to keep the pre-21 set from getting drinks. A Japanese restaurant on Newbury Street vows to try a new solution: Suing the families of the four teens who got it hauled before the Boston Licensing Board for serving underage drinkers.
Itadaki, 267-269 Newbury St., got caught May 1 when a detective from the BPD licensing board arrived for a random inspection and promptly found a table of four women who looked too young to drink the Bud Lights in front of them, despite driver's licenses from Rhode Island and Connecticut that put their ages at 21. In fact, Sgt. Det. Robert Mulvey said, all four of their IDs were fake, and he wrote a citation to the restaurant for serving them.
Itadaki's attorney, Karen Simao, told the Boston Licensing Board this morning the restaurant is no longer willing to just accept the damage to its business and reputation caused by pre-21 drinkers and that it's readying a lawsuit against the families of the four teens for the damage they've caused the restaurant's reputation - and potentially its business, should the board decide Thursday to suspend its license for one or more days.
In addition to possible lawsuits, the four teens also face criminal charges for being minors in possession of alcohol.
Simao and a restaurant co-owner said they are engaged in a never-ending arms race with crafty local teens and the sophisticated purveyors of fake IDs - the four teens presented licenses that even had realistic looking holograms on them.
Since the incident, the restaurant has bought an expensive license scanner - and doubled its efforts to get staff to reject anybody about whom there is the least doubt. They added the server in question was terminated.
"Selling four Bud Lights is not worth being closed for an hour, much less four days," Simao said.
Board Chairwoman Christine Pulgini, who noted the restaurant got a three-day suspension in December for a similar incident last year, said it might be time for the restaurant to follow state regulations, which specify that the only truly acceptable IDs are Massachusetts licenses or alcohol IDs, passports and US military IDs.
Itadaki said following that to the letter could put it out of business altogether - estimating roughly half its business on the tourist-heavy street comes from people from out of state or out of the country.
The board decides Thursday what action, if any, to take about both this incident and an incident four days later in which a rear exit was found blocked.
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
But the typical beer serving in Munich...
By Michael Kerpan
Wed, 06/10/2015 - 1:03pm
... is one liter. ;-)
I worked as a teller during
By anon
Tue, 06/09/2015 - 10:21pm
I worked as a teller during undergrad at bank on a local campus. it takes time and experience to be able to recognize and feel the difference between fake IDs. I can't blame the restaurant for their staff being unable to spot them. The bank where I worked was a large nationwide bank and we didn't have scanners. We had a UV light, a guide book and daylight and the guidebook changed every year. I can't imagine trying to examine all the security features at night to make sure the ID is legit. I think the suing of the students and families is an ok tactic by the restaurant, make kids think twice about doing something like this again. Having the restaurant closed for a few days affects the people who work there. I don't see anyone paying their bills while they're unemployed during that time. What these girls did is not a victimless crime if the restaurant closes and people can't make a living. That being said I wish they'd lower the age to what the rest of the world accepts as standard. It would solve a lot of problems.
The restaurant will lose
By Kaz
Tue, 06/09/2015 - 10:32pm
The court will not be able to find against the teens when it's pointed out that a Bud Light has less alcohol than an O'Douls.
Not all underage drinking in
By Sonicjm
Wed, 06/10/2015 - 12:02am
Not all underage drinking in restaurants occurs with fake IDs. Some young people get IDs from older siblings and friends...which would pass a scanner, I think.
True, but they often don't pass the stupid test
By adamg
Wed, 06/10/2015 - 6:42am
As in: Detective asks the kid for her Zip code and she gives hers, not the one listed on her sister's driver's license. Busted.
How far does a restaurant have to go?
By Kaz
Wed, 06/10/2015 - 8:45am
Testing telomeres for length? (Look it up, kids)
If they look like the photo and the ID is real, then the store has done its job in this arms race against Bud Light.
I mean they could take them out back and waterboard them (with Bud Light) to get them to confess to their real age...oh wait, no they can't. The door was blocked.
Zodiac sign is also a good one
By tachometer
Wed, 06/10/2015 - 12:57pm
The person checking doesn't even need to know what their appropriate sign is, if there is hesitation/confusion you know it's not theirs. Smart underage drinkers would know to learn this too.
I had a fake college ID from my school in Washington so everything was the same but the year of birth was pushed back by 3, I had a voter's registration card that I had used ink eradicator to erase everything printed on it and then reprinted it with all of the same information except the matching year to the fake.
I think they would be very unlikely to get you anywhere today, but back then I got into plenty of places with them. I got turned down at places too but they could only tell me it wasn't good enough ID so they wouldn't be confiscated. A lot of times success would depend on how I'd play it off when questioned.
One memorable incident I was when I was with two friends who were just over 21 while I was still just under by a few months and handed them to a doorman at a total dive bar. He asked where my license was and I told him I didn't drive. He then said, "Hold on, just let me check with the cop" which caused my friends to have a look of panic on their faces which fortunately wasn't noticed. So they had a Boston cop on detail in the bar who then came out with my two fake IDs in hand and the following conversation occurred.
Cop: Where's your license?
Me: Like I told him, I don't drive.
Cop: Where do you live.
Me: The address that's on there in DC.
Cop: What're you doing here?
Me: I grew up here, I'm just back visiting friends.
He turned to the doorman as he gave me my IDs back, shrugged and told him I was all set.
either way
By Ha Ha
Wed, 06/10/2015 - 11:21am
Either way you slice it, Mass is the only place with this problem. Its the only place where my out of state (over 30) friends have a hard time getting served. Its the only place where my almost 40 year old ass is triple ID checked. Its insane. But we're way ready for the Olympics right?
ps, Suing the family is absolute insanity. How will that ever get anywhere in court?
loss of $$$
By creel
Wed, 06/10/2015 - 1:31pm
The lawsuit would stand in court b/c the sanction for the restaurant is to close for 3-7 days. The restaurant would loose ~$30-50K by closing during that time. It was not their fault that the kids used fake IDs to get alcohol since it was the kids that initiated everything. Since the kids are underage then who is responsible? It would be the parents, who are the legal guardians of the kids until the kids attain "legal age". That's how I understand the grounds for the lawsuit, which in my view makes sense.
The "kids" are legally adults....
By Michael Kerpan
Wed, 06/10/2015 - 5:14pm
... but the US government, in its infinite wisdom, decided to pressure Massachusetts (and all the other states) into forbidding these adults (able to serve in the mikitary and to vote) from buying alcohol. Absent special circumstances (such as guardianship due to mental incompetency -- or some contractual arrangement), parents are not responsible for the actions of their adult offspring.
Pages
Add comment