A: Their lips are moving.
Bridge To Nowhere - $398,000,000
[img=192x252]http://www.knikbridgefacts.org/images/watershedkbf...
Here's an example that leaves me wondering why politicians feel compelled to misrepresent their record in making their case for their candidacy. It seems the facts don't support the story they present to you as their political history.
Here is McCain's latest ad, which celebrates McCain and running mate Sarah Palin: “The original mavericks. He fights pork barrel spending. She stopped the Bridge to Nowhere….”
Original Mavericks
But Governor Sarah Palin supported the Bridge to Nowhere. From the Anchorage Daily News :
The Alaska governor campaigned in 2006 on a build-the-bridge platform, telling Ketchikan residents she felt their pain when politicians called them "nowhere."
...In September 2006, Palin showed up in Ketchikan on her gubernatorial campaign and said the bridge was essential for the town's prosperity.
She said she could feel the town's pain at being derided as a "nowhere" by prominent politicians, noting that her home town, Wasilla, had recently been insulted by the state Senate president, Ben Stevens. "OK, you've got Valley trash standing here in the middle of nowhere," Palin said, according to an account in the Ketchikan Daily News. "I think we're going to make a good team as we progress that bridge project."
One year later, Ketchikan's Republican leaders said they were blindsided by Palin's decision to pull the plug. link
On August 29, 2008, when introduced as Republican Presidential Nominee John McCain's running mate, Palin told the crowd: "I told Congress, thanks but no thanks on that bridge to nowhere" — a line that garnered big applause but upset political leaders in Ketchikan.
Palin's campaign coordinator in the city, Republican Mike Elerding, remarked, "She said 'thanks but no thanks,' but they kept the money." wiki
If Palin were a fiscally responsible government reformer, wouldn't she return the $398,000,000 to the Federal government?
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
link
By Anonymous
Mon, 09/08/2008 - 12:57pm
Link to the McCain ad, Original Mavericks.
Pork by Caribou Barbie
By Anonymous
Mon, 09/08/2008 - 3:53pm
[img]http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3052/2838322055_8c7...
Pam Cash-Roper talks about her American Dream
By Anonymous
Mon, 09/08/2008 - 3:58pm
YouTube link 2 mins.
Mad Magazine on Sarah Palin
By Anonymous
Mon, 09/08/2008 - 9:49pm
[img=375x524]http://craphound.com/images/2008-09-03-NotVettingS...
she won't ban abortion, that would make her a liar
By sheenaspleena
Tue, 09/09/2008 - 12:59am
from cnn...she's not trying to force her views on anyone:
Palin has done little while in office to advance a social conservative agenda. She told the Associated Press in an interview in 2006 that she would not allow her personal beliefs to dictate public policy.
"I've honestly answered the questions on what my personal views are on things like abortion and a lot of controversial issues," Palin told the Associated Press. "I won't hesitate to answer those questions about what my personal views are, but I am not one to be out there preaching and forcing my views on anyone else."
reproductive rights, abstinence only; sex education
By Anonymous
Tue, 09/09/2008 - 3:12am
John McCain's stated policy is to reverse Roe v Wade and make it a states' rights issue.
Sarah Palin ran for mayor of Wasilla, Alaska on an anti-abortion platform. Political pandering? Consistent with her values? Do you think she'll be a voice for choice in the White House? No. Me neither.
Just in case you were wondering...
By Marc
Tue, 09/09/2008 - 1:43am
Just in case you were wondering... the bridge was never built!
So who killed it then? Was it NOT Sarah Palin?
Even the Alaskan Democrats said so when attacking Ted Stevens:
http://www.retireted.com/teds-connections/earmarks/
Or as reported here, in the Anchorage Daily News:
http://www.adn.com/front/story/343508.html
Some political ideas are just too juicy for you to let pass by, I understand.
I don't expect a sympathetic ear here. But let me just point out that trying to seriously pretend that Palin was NOT the final arbiter in killing the Bridge to Nowhere, even in the face of some fierce local opposition, is so essentially asinine that arguing it will have the opposite effect on others from what you hope for.
Focus
By Kaz
Tue, 09/09/2008 - 2:09am
The point isn't whether she ultimately terminated the project or not. That is a fact that nobody is contesting.
The point of contention is with her "thanks but no thanks" attitude and stump speeches. She presents herself as having been the one to tell Congress off from the start. However, the record plainly tells that she was completely in favor of the bridge project until it was un-earmarked by Congress (on their own, not because she asked them to do so) and it became so politically untenable that she was forced to stop the project from a state level. She is simply lying outright about the time line and logic behind her decision to cancel the project.
In fact, she *still* began the $15 million road that now terminates at the water because it was to attach at the bridge that was never built. It is part of a $300+ million SECOND project being dubbed the "Road to Nowhere" that intends to connect Juneau to two nearby communities by road and ferry. As part of her debate answers in the 2006 gubernatorial election, she made it very clear that she is in favor of this project because AK's Congressmen were hard at work getting infrastructure funding and she would not want to stand in the way of such progress. Only very recently did she actually now call for a new review of the scope and necessity of this OTHER project.
I agree she did what you say
By Anonymous
Tue, 09/09/2008 - 3:07am
I agree she did what you say she did.
She also campaigned for Governor as a supporter of the bridge and kept the earmark money in the state treasury instead of returning it.
Arbus dos
By Anonymous
Tue, 09/09/2008 - 9:03pm
[img]http://www.ephblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/...
the drip drip drip of scandal and contraversy
By Anonymous
Wed, 09/10/2008 - 8:39pm
as the media vets Sarah Palin because McCain could not be bothered to. video
Palin isn't big on government transparency
By Anonymous
Thu, 09/11/2008 - 2:02am
Sometimes, the public wants to know what its elected officials are doing. That's what Andree McCleod, an "independent government watchdog," tried to find out when she requested internal documents from Palin's office that she suspected linked top-Palin aides to an effort to oust Alaska's Republican Party Secretary. But, as Mother Jones reports, Palin's office withheld 1,100 emails from McCLeod, claiming the correspondence covered confidential policy matters. It didn't. As Mother Jones' David Corn points out:
As McLeod states, "When the finger is pointed at somebody else, she's all for accountability. When it's pointing at her, it's different."
John McCain's ads
By Anonymous
Fri, 09/12/2008 - 12:04pm
John McCain's ads are LIES. Here's the video proof.3 mins.
[IMG]http://i279.photobucket.com/albums/kk143/nfsagan/s...
Link to video. 3 mins.
Stacey's Mom
By Anonymous
Fri, 09/12/2008 - 12:04pm
Stacey'sBristol's Mom has it going on. music videoDid Sarah Palin sell the Alaska governor's jet on eBay?
By Anonymous
Sat, 09/13/2008 - 12:37am
Q:Did Sarah Palin sell the governor's plane on eBay for a profit?
A: The jet was placed on eBay for sale, but it wasn't purchased from the site. The plane was eventually sold through an aircraft broker to businessman Larry Reynolds for less than the asking price and the original cost.
lobbyists in the McCain campaign
By Anonymous
Wed, 09/17/2008 - 4:38am
video 1min.