Hey, there! Log in / Register
Dianne Wilkerson not ruling out independent bid; but could be in more legal trouble
By adamg on Thu, 09/18/2008 - 11:42am
PolitickerMA has both stories:
- 'No comment' from campaign on possible independent bid against Chang-Diaz.
- Wilkerson violates her agreement with attorney general over those pesky campaign-finance obligations.
Chris Lovett, meanwhile, files an election-night report that would seem to indicate Wilkerson was still in a fighting mood, claiming that Chang-Diaz won't represent the overwhelmingly black precincts in their 2nd Suffolk district:
... "I think what [the primary outcome] proves is that you could be a state senator without representing a good core of this community," said Wilkerson, "and that makes me sick."
Ad:
Comments
Ah yes there is always an
Ah yes there is always an excuse with Wilkerson, she never makes a mistake or loses without their being some conspiracy behind it all. She had the overwelming support of the political establishment, and she still lost, thats not about race thats about Wilkerson being incapable of running an effective campaign. Patrick and Menino both have effective machines in all of those areas, between that and the machine she should have been working on she should have won easily. Incumbants almost always win...
I dont understand the line about being a state senator and not representing a core of the voting base. There is more to that district then "black" areas so does that mean Wilkerson, for all these years, has only represented the black voters? Does that mean Deval Patrick should not be governor because he doesnt represent a core segment of Massachusetts voters race wise? That contest was never about race, and Wilkerson should be ashamed of herself for bringing it up as if that was all that mattered. If she doesnt like how the district is layed out then thats a whole other fight she can fight (and should have been fighting all along.)
OH and one other thing, who moved thosevoting locations? Im sure it wasnt Chang-Diaz, I bet you it had something to do with City Hall, which is run by Menino, a Wilkerson supporter! If she wants to blame moving the locations fine, but she should have noticed those problems and been a good state senator and done something about it when the city made those decisions.
I share Wilkerson's
I share Wilkerson's discouragement that there is only one African-American in the State Senate. I'm also discouraged that there is no Latino representation in the body. I also would trust that Diane Wilkerson would have represented me, as a white constituent, and I trust Sonia Chang-Diaz will represent all of her constituents as well. I mean, look, this was a vote. The Democratic Party voters of her district choose the candidate the feel is best equipped to represent them. That shouldn't make anyone sick.
I think this does expose one of the flaws of racial gerrymandering designed to ensure representation of ethnic minorities in elected office. It can also force multiple underrepresented groups to compete for a single office representing racial diverse precincts. This can create an effect where by concentrating minority voters in one district, it also limits their ability to influence a wider group of officials directly representing those voters. Might black voters have more clout if instead of being the core of one district, were a significant voting block in several? These are complex issues, and I don't mean to suggest that there are right and wrong answers or that answers are easy to come by. But I'd worry about feeling like we've accomplished something by designing a single district to produce minority voices in the State Senate. We can do more.
so in other words, you've got to be black?
Wilkerson was still in a fighting mood, claiming that Chang-Diaz won't represent the overwhelmingly black precincts in their 2nd Suffolk district:
So, you've got to have the same skin color to properly represent people in government? Racism, anyone?
"I think what [the primary outcome] proves is that you could be a state senator without representing a good core of this community," said Wilkerson, "and that makes me sick."
Maybe the community felt that her conduct on financial and criminal matters did not represent them, more than the color of her skin *did*.
Does this mean ...
that Senator Wilkinson did not properly represent the people in her district who were not African-American?
If not, then why is she claiming that Chang-Diaz won't properly represent all the district's constituents?
The fact is, African-Americans historically vote their best interests, even when there is an African American on the ballot. Sounds to me like her own ethnic community wasn't interested anymore.
There was a 200 something
There was a 200 something difference between the two and the districts that went for Diaz went to the polls at a higher rate then those who went for Wilkerson. Thats says to me that the African Americans who did vote voted for Wilkerson (the majority at least) but many stayed home (which in many cases is a way to vote against someone that you cant bear to vote for again without actually voting for the other person.) I think the people in Wilkersons strong holds just had enough of her craziness and decided it was more important to get to work on time and get dinner on the table then go out and waste their time voting for her AGAIN.
District demographics
The Globe story has an interesting map (not online, of course) that basically shows Chang-Diaz winning big in places like JP and Back Bay and Wilkerson winning big in Roxbury. So there is definitely a split in the district. But Wilkerson didn't seem to mind that two years ago when she won.
The map is there now
fyi
exactly what I was thinking
that Senator Wilkinson did not properly represent the people in her district who were not African-American?
If not, then why is she claiming that Chang-Diaz won't properly represent all the district's constituents?
Exactly. And she's not gay, yet she was a strong proponent for her gay constituents. Funny how that works, eh? She's walking, talking proof against her own argument.
One at a time
In that vein, it's pretty sorry that Massachusetts only has a single black Senator and of course Dianne's been the only black woman in that house. Sonia now will the one Latina in the Senate.
That's so far out of alignment with the commonwealth's population, whether it is through redistricting or the normal political processes, getting better representation should be on the legislature and Democratic Party's minds.
Where's the mentoring? Where's the development? Where's putting your oral egalitarianism into action?
I think the better thing to
I think the better thing to do is to get the concept of race and sex off of our minds and vote for people. Our governor is black, and he won by pretty handy numbers. I dont recall (I may be wrong) anyone really making a huge fuss about his blackness in the election, except to say if it were to happen it would be historic. I feel that Obama has taken the same road (I voted for and supported Hillary), with a few exceptions, and that has allowed him to reach out to so many more voters. People like Wilkerson paint things as us versus them then get shocked when the "them" dont appreciate that. In her comments on election night she proved that shewas trying to win based off of one group, which isnt what democracy was about.
Few Senate Districts Overall
There aren't that many Senate districts, so they tend to be diverse no matter where in the state that you are. People who think they can run on their home turf get buried in these races. A successful candidate has to work hard to get those votes in out-of-turf areas, not just play hometown hero.
The senate district that I live in cuts a diverse swath from Somerville to Winchester with a piece of Woburn! I worked with a committee planning a fundraising event for Jehlen, and it was an uphill battle (but an extremely successful one) to get the event held in Winchester or Medford, which wasn't the usual safe, home-turf potluck house party for much of her crew. Problem was, the home turf was already producing the donations - the other places didn't really know her and were being peppered with "push polling" to make her look like a lunatic.
It turns out that Winchester was an excellent choice - not only were they receptive to a female candidate, they had a backward jerk for a rep who was also running for the Senate seat - the kind that would not only ignore the views of a constituent phoning in about a bill, but would deliver a patronizing lecture about her lack of morality for holding a different worldview. Lots of wealthy women who despised him were quite ready to write some big checks and volunteer to canvass.
In the end, Jehlen was elected despite splitting her home turf with another popular candidate. She did it by narrowly winning Somerville and pulling solid second place vote totals in the other communities behind the hometown boys who didn't campaign effectively outside their base.
The key lesson here: you can't just pass out balloons at hometown soccer games if you really want to win. You can't expect your neighborhood or city or town of origin to carry you into a senate office like it can win you a rep's office. And you can't complain if your base support doesn't bother to vote while your opponents draw wider ranging support. That is the way the senate game is set up - popularity in one community won't be enough to get you in.
Make it two
We can make it two Latin American women: http://www.saraorozco.com/
I love her resume in the
I love her resume in the about me section. Its amazing a spanish woman can be elected in that area but not the heavily spanish areas of the state.
She must have married an irishman or a northern european type, her kids are very very white (under about me.)
She is a lesbian.
...
OK well that explains alot.
OK well that explains alot. That makes alot more sense because they are very white children.
Barrios was gay as well (Cambridge), why do gay latinos seem to be more successful then non gay latinos when it comes to getting into the state house?
Is Barrios a Latino?
I thought he was a Portuguese-American (perhaps he just lived in that area of Cambridge for a long time). Brazilians, Azoreans, and Portuguese don't usually identify as Latino.
As for Senator Orozco, I'm darker than she is, but I'm not Latino. I've known Mexicans and Brazilians who are way paler than I am. There is a lot of variation.
Barrios is definitly Latino,
Barrios is definitly Latino, mostly Cuban by way of Florida to be exact. I dont know how his portuguese is but his espanol es muy bueno.
"We're both their moms"
Orozco's wife, Lori Herman, is the boys' biological mother, and Orozco has adopted them as well. That makes them twins with two moms. Cool. (:O)
bottom line
black or white she was a corrupt politician that was elected over and over. not much different than some of the old, corrupt, irish pols in boston's history. im sure she took care of her base and thats who kept re-electing her. now people are seeing how important her office could be for everyone in that district. out with the old in with the new. i wish sonia chang-diaz all the luck in the world and d. wilkerson should have enough class to do the same thing.
Reporter: Media, other pols done Wilkerson wrong
David Bernstein at the Phoenix pens a mea culpa (wea culpa?). He cites as an example all the hullabaloo, in that campaign-financial suit by the AG, over a $60 bra Wilkerson allegedly bought with campaign funds. Only it turns out the AG's office couldn't read, because they based that fact on a $60 receipt from Brasserie Jo, a Back Bay restaurant:
Nevermind!
A coworker of mine once turned in a receipt from "Graybar", an industrial supply company.
There was a small typo - and from there on out he never lived it down. "Well, Kev, I'm not the one who spent $350 at a GAYBAR".
This is about on that level.
Wilkerson staves off more legal trouble
The Globe reports: