At 1:35 p.m., the MBTA sent out this tweet:
Lowell Train 319 (1:15 pm outbound) is operating 15-25 minutes behind schedule between North Station and Lowell due to terminal congestion.
Neighborhoods:
Topics:
Free tagging:
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
"Terminal congestion"
By roadman
Fri, 10/14/2016 - 2:09pm
just happened to be the pre-printed excuse that the alerts writer's dart hit today.
The T attempted to clarify (Claritinfy?)
By adamg
Fri, 10/14/2016 - 2:23pm
In response to somebody asking about "terminal congestion," the T wrote:
Which for those of us not well versed in train lingo means, I think, a train died on the tracks, keeping other trains from using those tracks, but I'm sure Roadman will know for sure.
Ok, so it's not congestion.
By anon
Fri, 10/14/2016 - 2:28pm
Ok, so it's not congestion. It's a mechanical breakdown on a different train.
It would be very hard to have simple congestion mid-day on the commuter rail, since trains run so infrequently.
Your translation of the T's attempt at fancy "railspeak"
By roadman
Fri, 10/14/2016 - 2:40pm
is exactly correct. North Station has many tracks that shrink into few tracks as trains leave - the switches at this track reduction are known as a "throat" in railroad lingo (no kidding here), and it's entirely possible that a disabled train within the "throat" could prevent a departing Lowell train from accessing the specific track they need to proceed north.
Of course, the T's alert person could have just said "due to a disabled train" to describe the problem instead of trying to sound impressive.
Or maybe it might not have
By DTP
Fri, 10/14/2016 - 2:49pm
Or maybe it might not have been a disabled train? There are other causes for congestion.
From the T's 'clarification'
By roadman
Fri, 10/14/2016 - 2:53pm
(which Adam posted above):
Plus, if there wasn't really a disabled train, it wouldn't be the first time the T blamed something on a non-existent mechanical issue. They do it all the time when Keolis decides to cancel trains for their convenience.
Mechanical issue =/= disabled
By DTP
Fri, 10/14/2016 - 3:11pm
Mechanical issue =/= disabled train. Keolis knows more about the situation than you do, so I'm sure they had a reason for deciding that "terminal congestion" was a more logical reason than "disabled train".
Disabled train typically implies a disabled train on the line the alert is for. But if there's a disabled train that's just being moved from North Station to BET, for example, and it just happens to take up a track in the North Station yard, meaning other trains have to shift around it, that would create congestion that might impact the Lowell train, even if the disabled train is not a Lowell train, and is not on tracks Lowell trains would normally use, and is therefore irrelevant to the Lowell train, apart from causing congestion that impacts it.
Also, please cite evidence that proves Keolis has ever cancelled trains "for their convenience".
cancellations
By Peg
Fri, 10/14/2016 - 4:11pm
Well, there were at least 2 trains cancelled on the Rockport line this morning, with NO explanations offered...just sayin'
Terminal Congestion
By Aeroguy
Fri, 10/14/2016 - 3:05pm
Similar terminology is used in aviation. And the terminology can also be ambiguous / unclear.
'Congestion' generally implies there are more planes arriving and departing than there is space in the air to handle them safely. So, to maintain safety, departures get held on the ground. Sometimes, like after a thunderstorm shuts down an airport, it can take an hour or so to get all delayed departures on their way, without an aircraft being disabled.
It would take some serious
By anon
Fri, 10/14/2016 - 7:35pm
It would take some serious skill to cause congestion with the sparse mid-day schedule.
Here's what leaves North Station during the two hours leading up to 1:15 pm:
11:15 Lowell
11:20 Newburyport
11:30 Fitchburg
12:00 Rockport
12:15 Lowell
12:30 Haverhill
1:00 Fitchburg
1:15 Lowell
It's not exactly the busiest railroad in the world.
Terminal Congestion
By Rob
Fri, 10/14/2016 - 2:49pm
Terminal Congestion
Isn't that what did in the Bronte sisters?
The train that died was not disabled
By anon
Sat, 10/15/2016 - 6:21am
It was mechanically 'challenged'. There was a mechanically challenged train causing delays.
Add comment