School Superintendent Tommy Chang announced today he's scrubbing plans to start more elementary kids earlier and high-school kids later for the coming school year.
Over the past few weeks, we have heard from families, staff, and stakeholders that there are concerns with the implementation of the new start and end times policy. After reflecting on this feedback, we understand that while the new schedule would achieve our goal of supporting academic success for all ages, the shifts to many school start times caused a more significant disruption to family schedules than we intended. That is why I have decided not to implement the new start and end times that we have proposed for the 2018-2019 school year.
As Superintendent of the Boston Public Schools, I am deeply committed to joining together with the broader community to get this right and to invest our time in solving these complex issues.
Going forward, we will focus our efforts on continued and improved engagement with all of our families and community members to solve the problems necessary to build a more coherent school system. This includes developing a new schedule of start and end times for future school years that is grounded in equity and better meets the needs of our students and families. We must share a collaborative spirit, and work together to find solutions to repair the institutional inequities that persist.
After the changes were announced, parents of elementary-school students who might have to be in school by 7 a.m. began increasingly vociferous protests - even at a Christmas-tree lighting in West Roxbury. Protests continued at meetings called by BPS this week; parents were also planning a protest outside Mayor Walsh's re-inauguration on Jan. 1.
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
Rule #7
By Waquiot
Sat, 12/23/2017 - 12:04am
Stay away from toxic decisions.
If your point is that flip-flopping is a bad thing, I
By MC Slim JB
Sat, 12/23/2017 - 7:54pm
wouldn't include the Olympics or Indy Car on your list. Those were two giant artillery shells that the city ducked thanks to merciful flip-flopping.
Something about that letter
By Rob K. (not verified)
Fri, 12/22/2017 - 3:33pm
I find that letter really weird.
It is three times longer than it needs to be, to say:
"I didn't realize this would be so unpopular.
But, I'm on the side of equity.
Let's talk more later."
Seems like there's a lot between all the extra lines that I can't parse. I wish there was an annotated copy.
In short, it has a lot of nice words in it, but it makes me want to run away.
School administrators
By adamg
Fri, 12/22/2017 - 6:42pm
Often have difficulty saying in one word what they can say in three.
Ah, Boston has the school
By anon (not verified)
Fri, 12/22/2017 - 7:41pm
Ah, Boston has the school system it carefully crafted and it citizens have accepted and deserve.
This is the best thing to happen to the BPS in years.
By bulgingbuick
Sat, 12/23/2017 - 8:50am
Though unintended this bureaucratic faux pas demonstrates how to move a school system in a positive direction. Parental ownership. The most vocal parents appear to be middle class white people from Roslindale and West Roxbury. Although I haven't seen it yet I expect the usual suspects will deem them racist by virtue of privilege expecting everyone to then retreat into their corners. I sense this may not work this time as the mouthpiece of elitism is mired in a scandal which highlights its ever present hypocrisy.
It shouldn't and won't happen over night but the end of busing is imminent. The city must create neighborhood schools that are equally effective in educating regardless of zip code. It is not impossible.
Amazing
By anon (not verified)
Sat, 12/23/2017 - 11:28am
we haven't heard from the "so called" School Committee.
Boston Herald editorial
By Rob K. (not verified)
Thu, 12/28/2017 - 9:12pm
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/columnists/joe_ba...
Pages
Add comment