Wynn steps down as Wynn Resorts CEO. He maintains his innocence, says he doesn't want to let the haters tear down the company he built.
Last week, a state gaming investigator publicly stated that Wynn's attorney acknowledged he had paid a manicurist $7.5 million to keep quiet about her claims he molested her.
Neighborhoods:
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
He’s still got fingers in...
By Lee
Tue, 02/06/2018 - 10:26pm
.... that pie.
Betting Man
By formerlyTheSoBo...
Wed, 02/07/2018 - 9:43am
I'm betting Stevey will end up OK.
A rich male will somehow figure out how to get the legal system to work in his favor. Rich males that went to an expensive private high school are due for a break.
That is pretty gross
By Will LaTulippe
Wed, 02/07/2018 - 1:12pm
It's almost as if this country should have voted against that kind of thing.
Oh wait.
Wynn gave Baker over a million.
By anon
Tue, 02/06/2018 - 11:32pm
It came via the Republican National Committee to the pro Baker Polito 2014 super pac Beth Lindstrom ran. Baker doesn't want to give it back but he knows he should
Shhhhh
By Michael
Wed, 02/07/2018 - 9:31am
If this gets out, the Globe will have to hurry to bump up its monthly article about how gosh-darn popular he is.
Accusations are not convictions
By Roman
Wed, 02/07/2018 - 3:33am
and strictly speaking neither is evidence of hush money.
I'll demonstrate why:
$UHUB_COMMENTER molested me when I was a little girl. I demand they be kicked off the site.
Agreed.
By Marco
Wed, 02/07/2018 - 7:45am
I'd have enough money to cure cancer if I would just stop paying people left and right for shit I absolutely didn't do.
SAD!
Sure, if you believe
By anon
Wed, 02/07/2018 - 8:15am
Sure, if you believe notoriously stingy, thick skinned billionaires give away 7.5 million dollars just because someone says something bad about them...
Sorry, Republicans made the rules
By boo_urns
Wed, 02/07/2018 - 9:13am
With Weinstein. Now you have to play by them.
For once we agree
By erik g
Wed, 02/07/2018 - 9:26am
He's totally entitled to due process before the state convicts him of sexual assault charges.
Which they have not trying to do. It's not a criminal trial, so no one is entitled to any of the constitutional protections afforded to it. They're investigating the fitness of his company to run a casino in the state, which is a totally orthogonal thing. (And yes, for the record, I agree that it's a completely bogus set of hoops to jump through, but we'll never get rid of the gaming commission for the same reason we'll never get rid of our stupid liquor laws: it's a pseudo-legal process encumbered by centuries of Puritan ethics and hysterical moralizing)
And for what it's worth, Adam would be totally within his rights to boot $UHUB_COMMENTER based on your accusation. His operation, his rules. Just like the gaming commission.
Will the state make them take his name off the building?
By Ron Newman
Wed, 02/07/2018 - 5:21am
Right now, it's supposed to have a big lighted Wynn sign on top. Can the state make them take that off, and otherwise rebrand it so that it doesn't feature his name?
Do you want them to?
By Will LaTulippe
Wed, 02/07/2018 - 7:28am
Hell, I want a giant WYNN to light the night sky to remind everybody just how (expletive) useless big government is.
haha
By thr
Wed, 02/07/2018 - 9:06am
Someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed, go fight another losing fight
Losing fight?
By Will LaTulippe
Wed, 02/07/2018 - 1:16pm
What would be the winning outcome for you in this scenario?
For me, it would be "playing a game of blackjack with other adults at any hour I choose, with a choice of multiple entities facilitating the game."
Sure
By boo_urns
Wed, 02/07/2018 - 9:14am
It's happened at several Trump hotels since he took the presidency. I don't think that's some boogeyman "big government," though. I think that's the emoluments clause. You know, "good government."
How about
By Marco
Wed, 02/07/2018 - 7:46am
SIN?
Seems appropriate on more than one level....
Not sure why
By Gary C
Wed, 02/07/2018 - 8:50am
How does taking his name off the place help anyone?
Still the name of the company/owner of the casino
By bosguy22
Wed, 02/07/2018 - 9:05am
Why would they take their name off?
I don't mind leaving that decision to the company...
By anon
Wed, 02/07/2018 - 8:53am
...If they think putting "Wynn" at the top of the casino is a good branding decision for the company, so be it. Otherwise, they can call it something else.
Weinberg
By Oscar Worthy
Wed, 02/07/2018 - 2:35pm
There, Steve's happy and nobody else has be to too reminded of the whole thing.
I'm a woman and it's
By anon
Wed, 02/07/2018 - 8:07am
I'm a woman and it's certainly not going to stop me from going to his casino, having a good time, and spending a lot of cash. Just thought I'd throw that out there. I can't wait for it to open. I'm not much of a gambler, but I love the atmosphere and places to go, eat, and shop.
good to hear, Steve
By anon
Wed, 02/07/2018 - 10:47am
good to hear, Steve
Add comment