That alone was grounds for firing him after the December rear-end crash that injured 17, the Globe reports, adding authorities were also not too thrilled to find he had a loaded gun in his backpack at the time.
Topics:
Free tagging:
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
One more to be fired?
By Kaz
Mon, 02/05/2018 - 9:39pm
Slayman said she knew drivers were taking their phones on the trollies.
WTF? I thought that was the point of the "no cell phones" policy. Is she going to be fired too?
There's a difference between
By anon
Tue, 02/06/2018 - 8:05am
There's a difference between having your phone and using your phone.
The rule for operators prohibits "having"
By peter
Tue, 02/06/2018 - 11:11am
Operators are not supposed to even "have" the phones while on duty. The phone is supposed to be in the car or at home, not on the employee.
There are posters all over the employee areas reminding them.
"Slayman said she knew
By anon
Tue, 02/06/2018 - 10:55am
"Slayman said she knew drivers were taking their phones on the trollies."
Where did you hear that? It's not in the Globe article.
Edited out...seems a big omission/screwup
By Kaz
Wed, 02/07/2018 - 1:07am
It was originally in the article. It quoted her directly. If that was in error, it seems like they should have noted that as an errata on the article if they edited it out. Fucking Globe...
Good thing the Internet Archive is on the case:
https://web.archive.org/web/20180206005139/https:/...
Witness Intimidation?
By Irma la Douce
Mon, 02/05/2018 - 10:10pm
I wonder what is behind the possible witness intimidation charge(s)?
Also curious about the original Reddit post.
This is one of those charges
By anon
Fri, 02/09/2018 - 4:19pm
This is one of those charges prosecutors abuse nowadays when they "pile on" as many charges as they can in order to intimidate someone into taking a plea, like obstruction of justice, money laundering, "conspiracy to..." whatever. All the defendant has to do is speak to a single person about the crime they committed, ask them not to say something, and the prosecutor can pervert this into a "witness intimidating" or "tampering" charge.
The fact alone
By Brian Riccio
Tue, 02/06/2018 - 12:00am
that he was on Reddit should have been cause for immediate termination.
Reddit:
By Scratchie
Wed, 02/07/2018 - 9:24am
Threat or menace?
It's kind of fascinating to watch
By Brian Riccio
Wed, 02/07/2018 - 9:57am
the interplay between the semi intelligent narcissists and the low IQ cretins that argue incessantly about whatever bullshit their sub is devoted to.
Kind of like the bike vs car people here who just can't realize they're never going to get rid of either or treat bicyclists like they matter.
You can thank the lottery
By wtf021
Tue, 02/06/2018 - 6:12am
You can thank the lottery system the MBTA uses to hire these drivers. Just remember you are putting your life in the hands of some completely random person picked by a computer next time you ride a bus or train.
http://mbtajoblottery.com/
I expected that to be a
By anon
Tue, 02/06/2018 - 8:15am
I expected that to be a parody site. It is not.
Screening process?
By b from Ros
Tue, 02/06/2018 - 8:51am
You cant really stop people from applying for any job, but you can always screen them afterward...
Yep, you win the lottery and they mail you some keys
By peter
Tue, 02/06/2018 - 10:05am
You win that lottery and that's it. No screening, no weeks of training, no written tests. No physical, no random drug tests. They mail you a uniform and some keys, and you just jump on the nearest train and start driving.
you clearly know absolutely
By anon
Tue, 02/06/2018 - 4:18pm
you clearly know absolutely NOTHING about the hiring process!
WHOOSH!
By SwirlyGrrl
Tue, 02/06/2018 - 8:37pm
WHOOSH!
Bus to train
By BostonDog
Tue, 02/06/2018 - 10:09am
Isn't the policy they don't directly hire for trolly/subway conductors but instead offer the job to existing bus drivers?
And a better system is
By Waquiot
Tue, 02/06/2018 - 10:11am
To get your job because either you are friendly with your state rep or you have a relative working for the T?
Is there some metric we are missing? Is there a universe of people in the City of Boston who have experience driving a PCC or a subway train that the T is ignoring?
Does there need to be?
By Will LaTulippe
Tue, 02/06/2018 - 11:16am
Hire the best guy (or lady) currently in a smaller city. What does an IT company do? They don't settle for the best Bostonian, they import people from India and Poland.
It's like any other job. There's a ceiling and a floor. Somebody on this planet is the safest, most professional public transit operator, and somebody is the worst at that job.
If the best Bostonian you can get to do the job is playing grabass on their phone, packing heat like some dumbass gangster, and wrecking the trains, then clearly, the T can do much better to recruit talent from elsewhere.
Are you familiar with the pool of potential employees?
By boo_urns
Tue, 02/06/2018 - 1:11pm
In this particular industry? I wouldn't say it's exactly apples-to-apples with IT.
Did you also read that this driver was first hired in 2001 and has been an operator since? They made a huge mistake, no doubt, and I can't think of any reason why bringing a gun to work in a position like this would ever be acceptable or consistent with MBTA policy, and removal was proper. But it's clear this person got wayyy too comfortable in their job duties to let something happen like this, but it's not like they were hired yesterday and hadn't been providing otherwise good service in the years prior.
This is not a defense of this operator, at all. I just don't think that you can come to your conclusion as easily when you actually consider more about this.
Pay better attention to your employees
By Will LaTulippe
Tue, 02/06/2018 - 3:14pm
Get Mike Ehrmantraut on him.
You can thank your crappy schools
By anon
Tue, 02/06/2018 - 1:09pm
... for the fact that you can't think critically about what you hear or understand that this system doesn't end with the lottery or why it exists.
To even get in the front door
By cinnamngrl
Tue, 02/06/2018 - 4:32pm
To even get in the front door, though, there’s the lottery system.
All applicants are entered into the lottery, which happens every few years and contains over a thousand names, easily, according to Dillon. Everyone picks a rating station—your preferred station—but it can take a couple years to actually get there once you’re in the system. The Red Line, Dillon says, is by far the most popular rating station.
Once you’ve applied, hearing you number called can take years. And even then, there’s an interview, yearly, rigorous training, and written tests to maintain your certifications. In short, it’s a long road to get the chance to don an MBTA uniform. And once there, it can be a very trying profession.
this is quoted from this article
https://www.americaninno.com/boston/when-its-good-...
it seems to be the best explanation of the job lottery.
System Working
By anon
Tue, 02/06/2018 - 7:18am
Glad the T investigated and took action.
What do you mean "glad the T
By anon
Tue, 02/06/2018 - 8:31am
What do you mean "glad the T investigated" ? Investigation should be manadatory! WTF? What if it was worse? All because of a cell phone. And what's up with the gun?
...why the outrage?
By boo_urns
Wed, 02/07/2018 - 9:17am
Of course it's mandatory. In situations like this, as far as I know, the NTSB gets involved.
Not exactly correct.
By roadman
Wed, 02/07/2018 - 10:07am
The only accidents the NTSB are obligated to investigate are those involving any aircraft (both commercial and private) regardless of the extent or severity of the incident. This requirement was mandated by Congress in the original legislation creating the NTSB in the 1960s.
Investigating accidents that happen in other modes of transportation (highway, rail, marine, pipeline) is entirely at the discretion of the NTSB, who - like most government agencies these days - is operating with an increasingly restrictive budget.
Given that this collision resulted in no fatalities and the injuries sustained by passengers were relatively minor, and as the T's investigation has already determined the probable cause, I'd say it's unlikely the NTSB will get involved.
Thanks for correcting
By boo_urns
Wed, 02/07/2018 - 2:09pm
That's why I put the "as far as I know" in there because I wasn't sure. This isn't directed towards you, but my other point still stands that the following investigation would be mandatory, regardless of who would ultimately be responsible for conducting it.
T-Time
By anon
Tue, 02/06/2018 - 9:14am
The release of this story the day after the Patriots loss and the State House sex scandal is timed to minimize the public and the media's attention away from the MBTA troubles.
* Does the MBTA ban on cell phone use apply to Police Officers on traffic posts at North Station
* Did the employee have a license to carry a firearm
* Did the trolley driver have a criminal background
*How many employees have past criminal arrests ranging from domestic assaults to drunk driving or drug dealing
* How many employees carry weapons to protect themselves from the public
* How many employees fear for their safety because they have reported sexual harassment from their supervisors and nothing was done so they feel the need to carry weapons
* How many employees carry weapons in the workplace because they are in fear for their lives because of their race or sexual orientation.
* Those injured in the crash better call Saul because they just hit the T-lottery
Unless they were run down in a crosswalk by an at-fault driver
By SwirlyGrrl
Tue, 02/06/2018 - 8:44pm
Then the MBTA will try to delay, stall, and appeal hoping that they die first from their horrendous injuries.
The article listed the litany
By anon
Fri, 02/09/2018 - 4:23pm
The article listed the litany of things he's charged with, which included nothing involving the firearm. Therefore, at most the gun is (a) against MBTA policy so he can be fired for it, and (b) mentioned to add to the sensationalism of it all.
And what’s with the firearm
By anon
Tue, 02/06/2018 - 9:20am
And what’s with the firearm related charge going to Nakden District Court?
Sorry, that was supposed to
By anon
Tue, 02/06/2018 - 12:47pm
Sorry, that was supposed to be Malden*
It’s out of Dorchester District Court
By Waquiot
Tue, 02/06/2018 - 9:00pm
But he’s from Malden.
I do love the typo, though.
Nope, you didn’t read the
By anon
Wed, 02/07/2018 - 5:09am
Nope, you didn’t read the whole thing. It says he’ll be charged later for improper storage of a firearm through Malden District Court, so it happened within its area of responsibility
Reading fail
By Waquiot
Wed, 02/07/2018 - 8:30am
On my part. It is weird that they put charges in at two different courts on a single incident.
it was two different crimes
By cinnamngrl
Thu, 02/08/2018 - 9:05am
it was two different crimes or incidents. The firearm was reported to be at the scene of the accident, but no one one actually saw it. Clearly, when the detectives went to the home of the driver, they asked to see the reported firearm and noted at that time it was improperly stored in the driver's home in Malden. The firearm must be properly registered because that is a more serious charge.
I rode the line to and from Mattapan Square yesterday.
By Lee
Tue, 02/06/2018 - 10:21am
All I can say is that both drivers were courteous and drove safely. One was a bit stern because one passenger didn’t understand or pretended to not understand he needed to pay the fare. The same driver stopped before rolling into a station to allow an elderly woman to cross the tracks so she wouldn’t miss the trolley. The other driver was also conscientious and cheerfully announced all the stops.
And you checked for loaded
By anon
Tue, 02/06/2018 - 3:26pm
And you checked for loaded guns?
Have you been on recently?
By anon
Sat, 02/10/2018 - 11:24am
It improves for a few days and then collapses. Rinse and repeat
Add comment