Architect's rendering.
The Board of Appeals yesterday deferred any action on a proposed duplex on Hemman Street in Roslindale because the design - which featured two two-car garages right next to each other under the living space - was just too suburban for an urban neighborhood, even one as leafy as that section of Roslindale.
Scott Johnson, who owns an existing three-family house at 57 Hemman St., about midway between Kittredge and Highfield streets, wants to combine that property with the much larger empty lot he owns at 59 Hemman St., build a new two-unit duplex and turn the house into three condos.
Board members did not express any concerns about the height, density or nearness to property lines of the proposal for the total 14,715 square feet of land. But they tore into Johnson's design, which showed two 16-foot-wide garages right next to each other in the new building.
Board Chairwoman Christine Araujo, who lives nearby, said that much garage space in a row "seems inappropriate for the community."
Board member Anthony Pisani, an architect, agreed: "This is totally inconsistent with urban streets. This is a classic suburban layout."
Johnson's attorney, Jeff Drago, said the garages were the result of a series of compromises with neighbors. He said Johnson reduced his original four proposed units to two and agreed to give up an easement to the busier Cornell Street so that cars would only enter the property from Hemman.
Johnson said he initially looked at a possible driveway for parking, but that that wouldn't work because of the way the land dips in the middle.
But Johnson agreed to look at a possible "tandem" design - in which the garage would basically have two parking lanes for two cars apiece - which would let him build just a single garage door.
The board set a new hearing date of Sept. 11 for the proposal, to give Johnson time to come up with a new design.
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
My point was just that it
By Scratchie
Thu, 08/02/2018 - 2:12pm
My point was just that it seems a little odd to say that his proposed design is "too suburban" to go on a street that seems to be mostly colonials and capes.
The irony of providing 4 off
By cden4
Thu, 08/02/2018 - 3:54pm
The irony of providing 4 off-street parking spaces like that is that it takes approx 3 on-street spaces away in order to provide the driveways. Plus, you lose all that occupiable space from the ground floor of the house and ruin the whole front of the house. You could have a small yard and a front porch. Instead you have driveways, garage doors, and cars crossing the sidewalk to get to it.
Speculation
By ElizaLeila
Thu, 08/02/2018 - 5:23pm
You're just speculating that the house is only as deep as the garage.
Would I design the house differently and get the garages in there? Sure. But that's not what is the issue: the zoning board shouldn't be making design decisions unless they pertain to the Zoning Code.
I'm not assuming the house is
By cden4
Thu, 08/02/2018 - 5:26pm
I'm not assuming the house is ONLY that deep. But the garages do take up a significant part of the first floor, and eliminate the ability to have a porch or any windows in the front.
Or
By ElizaLeila
Fri, 08/03/2018 - 9:00am
Not everyone likes a front porch. Not everyone comes from areas that have front porches, perhaps this is this landowner's norm for home design.
They took a cue from the neighboring homes, tweaked that and now are getting dinged for it. It's dumb.
Actually, a nice looking house
By In The Know
Thu, 08/02/2018 - 8:07pm
Herein lies the problem with some of our officials. They ignore Roslindale's published zoning and push for "more density" and allow all of those cracker-box buildings that are going up all over. None affordable.
Roslindale's published zoning calls for two parking spaces per dwelling, regardless of what you think about auto emissions, or promoting public transit, bikes, walking, or hang gliders. Residents saw this and worked with the city to commit it to print. The Zoning Board needs to read their own documents.
And... anyone living in that neighborhood on the board needs to recuse themselves.
Now you have officials over-riding published zoning left and right.
Query... will the new occupants of any house get full disclosure on the flight path overhead to Logan?
That is a nice house and I'd welcome it in my neighborhood any day.
You should see
By anon
Thu, 08/02/2018 - 9:04pm
the crap the Board Of Appeals allows in South Boston.
It's a glorified mini mall
By Boston_Bloke
Fri, 08/03/2018 - 6:42am
That doesn't look like a house. Rather it looks like a strip mall with an apartment stuck on top. Totally inconsistent with any residential neighborhood, urban or suburban.
Pages
Add comment