Mouhab Rizkallah, who owns a number of apartment buildings, today agreed to drop his libel suit against two student journalists at the Tufts University newspaper who wrote about a protest about one of this buildings, but is continuing to sue one of the people he said organized the protest for defamation.
In a filing in Middlesex Superior Court today, Rizkallah and the two students asked a judge to dismiss the case with prejudice, meaning Rizkallah can't sue them again for the same incident - a protest outside his Somerville orthodontics practice that they covered.
Rizkallah dropped the suit less than a month after he filed it. He alleged the two Tufts Daily editors made him look like a liar for saying he "repeatedly" claimed none of the protesters were actually residents of the building, when, in fact, he recognized one of them as one of his tenants. Prior to the two sides filing the joint stipulation, the students' lawyer had filed an answer to Rizkallah's suit that said the students did not write anything inaccurate and that the story would stay posted on the Tufts Daily Web site.
In a separate action, Rizkallah sued Michael Ventura, in February for defamation. Ventura was one of the organizers of the protest the reporters covered.
In his suit, Rizkallah charges that Ventura has gone beyond simple protests into outright harassment, to the point of following him around and staring at him on the streets of Somerville, that despite Ventura's claims, he was never a tenant at the building in question and that while he had once legally lived in another building Rizkallah owns, Rizkallah sought to evict him for non-payment of rent in December, 2020, after which Rizkallah alleges Ventura broke into another apartment and began squatting there, along with some friends.
On March 9, Middlesex Superior Court Judge Maureen Mulligan issued a preliminary injunction against Ventura, ordering him to stay away from Rizkallah and his buildings and to not stage any loud protests in front of them between 7:30 a.m. and noon, Monday through Saturday. Mulligan wrote that Rizkallah had proven Ventura was doing "irreparable harm" to him.
On Monday, Ventura, who now lists a Fenway address, asked the judge to delay any action in the case until he can find a lawyer. Mulligan did not lift the preliminary injunction, but gave him until April 29 to find a lawyer and answer Rizkallah's defamation suit.
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 449.31 KB |
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
Magoo sez
By MisterMagooForYoo
Fri, 04/01/2022 - 6:10pm
Magoo is tired after a long week at work. Magoo is looking to getting home and having a little role play with Mrs. Magoo. Magoo and Mrs. Magoo like to pretend sometimes that it is 18th century France and Magoo is a patron at the local tavern and Mrs. Magoo is the barmaid. That comes to this and Magoo and Mrs. Magoo, well, that’s not for yoo. Magoo.
Wtf?
By anon
Fri, 04/01/2022 - 7:01pm
Wtf?
I'm sure a lot of people
By ZachAndTired
Fri, 04/01/2022 - 8:24pm
I'm sure a lot of people would probably like to pretend it's (late) 18th century France with this landlord too.
Give it a rest
By Username Unknown
Sat, 04/02/2022 - 11:56am
This Magoo schtick is old and tired. No one (except yourself) thinks anything you say is funny. Go away please.
Let me pull your coat
By lbb
Sat, 04/02/2022 - 3:47pm
Every single post you've ever made has been oversharing, but this really takes it to a new level. Give it a rest.
"irreparable harm"
By Thanks for nothing
Sat, 04/02/2022 - 6:53am
"irreparable harm"
What does the judge think "no-fault" eviction causes for people? Picnics with unicorns?
Mouhab Rizkallah
By Boston_Bloke
Sun, 04/03/2022 - 12:02am
Mouhab Rizkallah has a horrible reputation as both a landlord and as a medical practicioner.
However UniversalHub does not come through in covering key events in the Muslim-American community. Yes Rizallah deserves to be put under the spotlight. But it coincides with the first day of Ramadan, which was oddly overlooked by Universal Hub.
Add comment