Hey, there! Log in / Register
Former eBay exec admits he was a rotten piece of work who tried to destroy a Natick couple
Support Universal Hub
Help keep Universal Hub going. If you like what we're up to and want to help out, please consider a (completely non-deductible) contribution.
Comments
The definition
Of insanity. I’m not a litigious person but I feel the the damages and penalties should be more severe for something as gross as this
Not insanity
Cruelty.
Systematic does not imply pathological.
And could this guy have had a more cognitively dissonant job title? Ugh.
More and more
This is just another example of how much our species is in decline.
Decline?
I don't want to be all bright-eyed and optimistic, but examples of human awfulness from 200 years ago, or 500, or 1000, or 2000, or 5000, are plentiful. Pick a century, and there are a whole lot of reasons you wouldn't want to live in it. The lesson is that you are not sufficiently pessimistic. The true pessimist's doctrine is: whichever way you move in time, things get worse. Everything is worse than everything else. This doctrine is both illogical and infallible.
above criticism
Agreed, this shows that when human achieve a level of success in life, they feel they are above criticism and consequences. Just like a person who got their money from blood diamonds who just bought twitter because they hurt his feelings.
The past was so much better
Everyone knows that "music today sucks" and it was so much better "back in the [earlier decade]".
I don't know that
Because it ain't true.
Hail Olivia Rodrigo.
My favorite
Older Boomer Cousin: kids to day are so awful because they weren't spanked!
Me: your generation had the most epic crime rates in history
OBC: WE UNDERSTOOD RESPECT OR WE GOT THE BELT!
Me: (links to stats and studies of societal violence and prevalence of violent child discipline vs. violent crime)
Me: You grew up in same time period/household with (criminal cousin)
OBC: THAT'S NOT TRUE BECAUSE WE LEARNED RESPECT (enabler language about CC and how it wasn't his fault, etc.)
Cool story, bro
So your misguided relative is, by implication, used to characterize all "boomers." Very entertaining, but not really enlightening.
Boomers
I don't know if you know any but when you have them on your FB roster you see loads of these postings about "kids today" and then the chorus of self-congratulatory inanity begins rolling.
So if you have no family or friends like this, you also don't get bonus postings of "we had the best music ..." and that other older boomer hit "we grew up with lead paint and didn't have seatbelts and we survived!"
One of their superiority complex scripts. What can I say? You want me to screen cap the chorus of retronarcissism and repost some of their memes? Sure thing.
Are people still saying boomer?
I guess so.
Y’all need the belt!!!!
Jk.
Boomer?
Instead of saying "OK Boomer"
The correct phrase is "10-4 Dinosaur."
Let's have some consecutive sentences, Judge Saris.
Maybe let him out in twenty years if he rolls over on his bosses.
this is
an example of how every American or global corporation would behave under a corporate dictator in this country. their culture would change immediately such that offenses of this nature against any who dissent would be accepted as commonplace .
To be clear
This guy, while creepy as hell, didn’t physically harm anyone and could get more than 20 years in prison.
The cop that RAPES children for decades gets only 10 years (or less) in prison.
For all of you people who think the laws (and under sentencing judges) are good enough to protect children from child predators, I suppose you also think this sentencing makes sense and the cop doesn’t deserve more time.
You’re part of a sick problem in society and you know who you are. You care more about politics than people.
huh?
being happy that corporate stalkers trying to ruin a couple's life have been caught and will be sentenced (something that hasn't yet happened so why the outrage?) does not make everyone on this site pro pedophile. What twisted logic brought you here? I know it feels triumphant to be the "only" one who gets it but the MAJORITY OF HUMANITY is against child rape. The sentencing of this guy has no relation to the sentencing of the cop who raped the kid - the fact that he was a cop might have chopped some time off his sentence when it should have added time to it. Maybe mandatory sentencing guidelines were a bad idea? It should make you happy that, once again, THE MAJORITY OF HUMANITY is against child rape but something tells me you won't react that way. Go outside and touch some grass my dude.
Two articles before this
Reports a child rapist getting 10 years in prison while this guy will likely get a harsher punishment.
There is your connection. Yes, new sentencing guidelines are needed.
so the articles are close to each other
still has no connection to this case. It is possible to be glad that the ebay exec was found guilty (and STILL isn't sentenced yet), glad that the child raping cop was caught and convicted, and mad that he only got 10 years for it. It does NOT mean that everyone else but you is pro child rape. I can't understand this for you - you have to do the work yourself.
“…. didn’t physically harm
“…. didn’t physically harm anyone”
That’s simply not true. Do you believe stress doesn’t have any physiological effects?
It does
I am aware of the internal physiological responses the body makes to stress.
I am also aware of the physical and long lasting psychological harm of child abuse.
Why on earth would you try to equate them?
"Why on earth would you try to equate them?"
Aren't you the one who, unprompted, compared the two cases in the first place? And said that the eBay guy didn't cause physical harm? All I see after that is someone disagreeing with such assertion, I'm not really sure how that amounts to attempting equivalence.
I was trying to stay out of this thread but it just seems like you are operating in bad faith here.
I did compare the two
Yes that’s true. I found it both interesting and appalling that the judicial system is set up this way.
I said he didn’t physically harm them, which is also true. Did the psychological abuse lead to physiological reactions in the victim? Yes, of course it did, but why bring that up other than to equate the two forms of abuse?
There was no physical assault or abuse in this case and it is wrong that a man who raped children over the course of decades could get less of a sentence than a man who caused psychological stress to an adult couple over a one year period.
This eBay guy should still get some sort of punishment, obviously, but the fact that the charges for one year of psychological abuse against adults stack up to more than the charges for decades of raping children means these laws should be re-examined.
I was not trying to equate them.
You talk in riddles.
I've seen a hell of a lot of
I've seen a hell of a lot of strawmanning on this site, but "none of you want to publish pedophiles" is a whole new level.
Publishing pedophiles
How did this get to be a discussion about Nabokov?
Nabokov wasn't a pedophile; he just wrote about one
but of course that doesn't make the typo above any less amusing:
Nabokov to James Laughlin (founder of New Directions), February 3, 1954:
(Post edited for clarity)
Deterrence
I'm not in favor of a 20-year sentence, but it needs to be made very clear that corporations can't terrorize journalists without serious consequences. Other people besides him need to be charged, too.
(True justice would be to award the couple something like a 20% stake in eBay. I don't know if courts can do that, though.)
In other words
This should be the start of fines and penalties, not the end because "bad guy is in jail now".
I think you've invented a person to be mad at
You might want to consider taking a deep breath and maybe signing off of the Internet for a couple days. Maybe go outside and enjoy the sunshine for a while.
I think so, too
Looks like a strawman to me.
That is directed
To certain people here that feel the need to play politics when it comes to sentencing, particularly with abusers of children. I chose not to name any names, so yeah, it looks like it’s directed at no one, but it is not.