Hey, there! Log in / Register

Books moving down the block

Sean Hennessey shows us the human chain moving books through Porter Square today from Porter Books' old location to its new one.

Neighborhoods: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

I'm not an expert on these things but would it have been quicker to do more than one book at a time?

up
Voting closed 21

I participated in this. They did in fact sometimes pass more than one at a time.

Specifically, they’d planned out the fact that they had to cross the signalized intersection at Somerville Ave @ Mass Ave, and they didn’t want to shut the road down.

Therefore, they stationed employees with carts at the intersection, and did a thing where they’d load up the first cart while the “don’t walk” signal was on, and keep going until the cart was full. When the “walk” signal turned on, they’d push the loaded cart across the street (and send an empty cart in the other direction). On the other side, by the Porter Square MBTA station, an employee would start unloading the books, 1-3 at a time, and the chain would continue from there. They did a pretty good job of timing things so that by the time the cart was empty, the walk signal would change again, so a new loaded cart would cross the street and keep the line going.

But anyway, TLDR yeah they did sometimes pass multiple books at a time. Not so many that it would be cumbersome for the next person in the chain to take the hand-off, so usually it was 1-3 at a time.

up
Voting closed 53

But we have discovered the wheel. I feel like a few bikes from Bicycle Belle could have done the job a bit more quickly. Even at one book per second this is 3600 books per hour … how many books does the store stock? I'd guess several hours worth. But maybe they've sold down stock …

up
Voting closed 30

Well, you understand this is more about the publicity it creates, rather than just moving the books?

up
Voting closed 62

I participated and it was over in less than 45 minutes. Even at a book a second (which wasn't happening), that would have been 2700 books. I suspect it was more like 700. Happy to be corrected by someone who was counting.

Brilliant, though. Everyone enjoyed themselves. I'm glad I helped out.

up
Voting closed 54

It was a publicity stunt to make long time customers feel they were part of the bookstore "family" and keep coming to the new store. I didn't get to Cambridge until it was over, so I don't know if it worked or not.

up
Voting closed 45

I participated in this today, so can fill in a bit of detail.

  • It was absolutely a PR thing. This wasn’t about efficiency, it was PR — start right when the Honk Parade finished going by and there was a crowd milling around anyway, some of whom are surely already patrons of Porter Square Books, get them to help shift some of the inventory from the old space, and get a chance to see the new space — and take a free “promo” copy book too, if anyone wanted one. And make sure some news cameras are on the scene for some free publicity.
  • They didn’t want to hire a police detail, or deal with the rest of the logistics involved in shutting down access to the Porter Square shopping center, Somerville Ave at Mass Ave, etc. So they kept it limited — today’s “bucket brigade” only moved two shelves — the “romance” section. They’re having professional movers get the rest next week.
  • It was fun. Bah humbug.
up
Voting closed 70

When I first heard about this I thought it was a cool idea. The actual execution shown is about as inefficient as you could imagine - one book at a time. Couldn't they have done a few books or a box with 5 books that passed from hand to hand?

up
Voting closed 23

was moved, or will be moved, by truck, and that they always planned to do that.

up
Voting closed 27

This was a PR stunt, not an exercise in efficiency.

It wasn’t always one book — sometimes we’d pass up to three or so — but any more than that and it started slowing down the rhythm of passing them along. This was very much a “many hands make light work” thing, where it was actually easier to pass no more than a couple at a time.

Boxes would’ve been the same problem: then somebody would have had to get a bunch of boxes, pack them on the source side, pass them down the line, unpack them on the destination side, maybe send the empty boxes back, etc. It seems like a good idea but the logistics would be a lot more complex than what they actually did.

Also, we only moved the Romance section. Professional movers are getting the rest of the inventory next week.

up
Voting closed 34

that people on this site can read about a local business doing something fun and harmless and quirky and inclusive and think to themselves "erm actually this was not the optimal way to maximize efficiency. methinks there were ulterior motives at play...."

wait no it doesn't but even still. some of y'all post like you haven't had a semblance of life behind your eyes since the reagan administration.

up
Voting closed 53

… bit of PR for a local business …. then can anyone say it wasn’t highly efficient?

C’mon peoples, it was the Romance Section!
Not the Physics Section.

up
Voting closed 37