Hey, there! Log in / Register

Shoplifters love them all the Back Bay stores, but Lululemon seems to be a favorite

A man and a woman face charges in unrelated shoplifting incidents in which both targeted Lululemon outlets in the Back Bay.

Serial shoplifter, Essie Billingslea, 34, of Boston - 20 shoplifting convictions since just 2021 - however, won't have to worry about further arrests for awhile, because a Boston Municipal Court judge sentenced him last week to two years in jail for violating parole on one of his earlier shoplifting convictions, the Suffolk County District Attorney's office reports.

He had been wanted for a string of shoplifting incidents at, among other places, both Back Bay Lululemons - the one on Newbury Street and the one at the Pru - as well as at the Pru Victoria's Secret - always using T.J. Max bags to haul away his loot. According to the DA's office:

On August 29, police responded to Lululemon located at 208 Newbury Street for a larceny in progress. The manager reported seeing a male wearing a yellow shirt and black pants conceal multiple boxes containing 145 pairs of leggings, with a value of $29,120 into T.J. Maxx shopping bags.

Billingslea was also wanted for lifting a mere 31 pairs of leggings - worth $3,200 - from the Pru Lululemon on Sept. 4, and $1,558.50 of stuff from the Victoria's Secret.

Separately, Boston Police arrested an Ipswich woman on shoplifting charges after allegedly taking 48 items, worth $4,812.94, from the Pru Lululemon shortly after 8 p.m. on Saturday.

Kourtney Elizabeth McLean, 33, was charged with larceny over $1,200, police say. Police did not specify if she limited herself to leggings (yes, the chain sells other stuff) or what she used to carry everything.

At her arraignment at Boston Municipal Court, a judge ordered her held behind bars when she could not come up with the $750 bail she had set. Mclean is next scheduled for a court appearance on Dec. 3.

Innocent, etc.

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

You know what a real crime appears to be here?

145 pairs of leggings, with a value of $29,120

up
Voting closed 57

The real crime is the leggings themselves, regardless of cost. The most hideous design of clothing ever invented, bar none. They show every lump, bump, bulge, line, crack, outline, nook and cranny of the wearer. But, hey, if people choose to let it all hang out like that and want to pay a fortune for the privilege, I say go for it. Let your freak flag fly.

up
Voting closed 25

Don't wear them.

These are supposedly for working out. I wear leggings all the time for that, also for biking, also with tunic tops and short dresses. If I've gone too hard on leg day they can be very pleasant to wear with business casual above the waist on work from home days.

Mine are thick with contours so they don't look lumpy, and I don't buy them too small.

Of course, Loserlemon products are undersized and overpriced. I buy Danskin ones with pockets at Costco for $15 and they last.

ETA: link. Purple size L ordered.

up
Voting closed 22

At least those the male persuasion.

Thanks in advance!

up
Voting closed 10

Yeah, the sheer cost of anything Lululemon sells is ironic, considering yoga began as an ascetic spiritual practice, even if it's now morphed into a New Age white lady pursuit in the US. Even more ironic, the founder of the company is a fan of Ayn Rand.

up
Voting closed 30

...intentional or not.

up
Voting closed 19

The amount of mass-market clothing which can be carried by a single individual exceeds the value of some new cars.

Why would anyone hold up a jewelry store or bodega when they could carry out more loot from Lululemon and not even have to fight anyone for it?

up
Voting closed 22

$3,200 / 31 = W-T-F!!!! Obscene.

up
Voting closed 14

Gel-padded brand name bike tights with more features (ankle zips, wind resistance) and thick enough for freezing weather cost less than that if you catch summer closeout sales. I think I paid like $75 for Pearl Izumi.

up
Voting closed 15

On a related note, when leggings are $200, stealing might be the only recourse for a tight budget.

up
Voting closed 18

"Tight" budget?

Good one!

up
Voting closed 18

mor like delululemon.

up
Voting closed 14