Now that's something to be nostaligic for
Revisionism note: On the advice of a commenter (see below), I reread Cullen's column. And the commenter is right: Cullen isn't longing for the old days, even though his first few paragraphs seem that way. Instead, he's explaining that what mobsters we have left are probably getting away with stuff because the feds are reluctant to launch investigations that would only lead to Connolly-esque sins of the FBI past coming up in court again. At least, that's what I'm thinking now. However, I still think the city would benefit from a columnist who spends more time investigating today's crop of murdering, drug-running thugs rather than worrying about the Big Cheese. My original, snarkier, comment below the jump:
So Kevin Cullen misses the good old days when our gangsters rivaled New York's for their murderous viciousness. It's kind of a weird column for somebody who's written so movingly about the victims of violence in the past. Perhaps Kevin needs to spend less time rhapsodizing over old Mafiosi and Winter Hill informants and more time out on the streets with some of today's brand of murderous, increasingly vicious thugs.
Ad:
Comments
a little unfair
If you read the column he is talking about this in context of the fact that we can't have NYC style large scale federal trials because prosecuting crimes that date back decades involves too much investigation into law enforcement corruption in Boston. Instead we are left with organized crime but have to snip at them with petty boomarking charges, etc.
Yes
On rereading the column, I see that now. He could have cut out the nostalgia-ish stuff for us careless readers.