Roxbury bar faces more punishment for role in October murder
Four months after the city licensing office lambasted the Breezeway on Blue Hill Avenue as a menace to the public, the Boston Licensing Board gets its chance on Thursday.
The licensing board, which oversees liquor licenses, decides then what action, if any, to take against the bar for a double shooting that left one man dead outside its entrance on Oct. 23.
In its own ruling in November, the Mayor's Office of Consumer Affairs and Licensing, which oversees entertainment licenses, noted disagreement between the bar and police as to whether the alleged victim had been in the bar before the shooting but said it didn't really matter because the Breezeway has become such a magnet for unruly men spoiling for trouble:
Regardless of whether or not these victims were patrons, it can simply be said that the area outside the Breezeway at and around their closing time is not safe for any member of the public. This is attributable to the licensee's operation, their record of poor management and their propensity to attract unruly patrons which has made their operation the source of disruptive activity and has brought them outside of applicable requirements.
The licensing division noted numerous problems dating to 2005, including stabbings, near riots, fights and attacks on police officers. Last year, the licensing division ordered the Breezeway shut for 22 days - and the licensing board piled on with its own two-week suspension after a closing-time brawl that took 25 police officers to clear.
The licensing division ordered the bar shut for 13 days, its maximum occupancy reduced from 134 to 110 people, prevent patrons from loitering outside and lower the volume of music.
At a licensing-board hearing today, police said they responded to a call from bar manager Nick Stomatos to find a man mortally shot outside the bar and another man shot in the leg nearby. The surviving victim told police he had been inside the bar before the shooting, which Stomatos denied. Video from the bar showed the shooter coming from two blocks away and passing by the bar entrance before he opened fire.
Also at issue: A bottle of Hennessy found outside the bar the night of the shootings, which led to a police citation for letting a patron take liquor outside. Bar attorney Robert Russo at first said the bottle could not have come from the Breezeway. "My client doesn't serve Hennessy. We don't sell Hennessy at all."
"They serve Hennessy," police Det. Richard Henshaw, who attended the hearing. interjected.
Stomatos then said that while, yes, the bar sells Hennessy, it doesn't stock the small-sized bottle police found. Henshaw, however, said the bottle had a nipple on it, of the sort only a bar would normally use. Under questioning from Russo, he acknowledged anybody could buy a liquor-bottle nipple, but said he doubted you'd actually see anybody walking down the street with a nipple-equipped liquor bottle.
Ad:
Comments
Hmmm, maybe it's just me
But how is this the "bar's fault" and not a total and utter failure of the police?
Would the same apply if it was a popular bar downtown?
How about the club that got slammed and fined for disbanding a event because people not on the guest list started trying to get in, and they thought it was in the best interest to shut the whole thing down before it got out of hand?
Seems like bars a damned if you do, damned if you don't; while the police play cleanup and point blame, rather then do their work to prevent these problems with proper community outreach.
Yeah, they're responsible for the sidewalk out front
The licensing board always makes a big point of that and I guess the licensing office, which I haven't followed as much, does as well. More from its decision (which I would post in its entirety except that I only have a paper copy):
And, yes, I've seen the licensing board go after downtown clubs for stuff that happens outside.
What's the opposite of a celebration?
AlertNewEngland reports BPD had to respond to a large fight at the Breezeway at closing time early this morning.
Double standard
There are scores of violent incidents associated with the bars on Landsdowne Street and around Quincy Market.
http://www.universalhub.com/node/12987
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view.bg?...
For some reason these incidents do not result in a death sentence for the bars.
Bars in Roxbury are responsible for blocks around them.
Patrick Lyons and Seth Greenberg breeze into the Licensing Board with the likes of Dennis Quilty after homicides and beatings and all is forgiven.
There was a reason why Ron Wilburn got involved in informing - he found it impossible to do business trying to open a bar in Roxbury.
No Double Standard
Clearly, deselby, you are missing the point here. Neither Landsdowne St or Quincy Market are neighborhoods. The Breezeway is smack in the middle of a residential neighborhood. It is surrounded on three sides by private homes. They are the ones who are impacted by what is going on at the Breezeway - the traffic, the very late night noise, the trash and the crime. They are the ones who are driving the issue. Roxbury bars in areas like the NewMarket Square area don't have the same restrictions as the Breezeway. And bars like Packy's which are also in a residential area have to deal with the same issues. The point - don't have a loud bar in a close residential area.
As for Ron Wilburn, his issue was not that it was hard to have a bar in Roxbury, He never got that far. His issue was that it was impossible to get a license to have a bar in Roxbury, and not because of these types of restrictions, but because of corruption in the licensing process.
Two-day suspension
The Boston Licensing Board voted to suspend the bar's liquor license for that period at a meeting yesterday.