I found the following comment about Bob Joyce pretty laughable:
He said he'll work on building consensus between voters, relying on his experience as an attorney to work with groups with different viewpoints.
Really, you self-important censorious gasbag? For those who may have forgotten, Joyce organized a picket of a local liquor store (which has given back far more to the community than Joyce has, I'm betting), because it wouldn't knuckle under to his demand that it stop carrying the Boston Phoenix.
But does the article tell me where I can get the lawn sign for my Weld Street House that says "I'll vote for anyone who isn't Bob Joyce"? Ever since he ran against Senator Walsh solely on his anti-gay marriage platform (and *nothing* else) I've been against him.
I'm curious, how do people in W. Roxbury feel about the way the district is drawn? Is there an overlap in concerns between them and Brookline, etc., or would it be better to divide it another way.
The South End is split in two, which means half of us vote with Chinatown and the North End while the other half are South End and Roxbury.
Pamela Julian, the lone Brookline candidate in the race, reports she was endorsed by the progressive Brookline Pax. But Boston NOW's nod went to Paul Sullivan:
During his three years as an Assistant District Attorney, Paul saw first hand the issues that single parents face and the devastating impact of domestic violence. Sullivan is committed to working with Mass. NOW to eradicate violence against women; we look forward to electing him to the Legislature this fall.
I can't speak to the size of Mass Women's Political Caucus, which I doubt is larger than NOW, because its a national organization (perhaps you meant the MA chapter of NOW?), but I will say that any group that wishes to advance its cause has the responsibility of endorsing the candidate it feels best reflects its values and that they feel will most effectively advocate for them. Your assertion that because the Mass Women's Political Caucus is somehow more credible than NOW because it endorsed Tynan, by your intimation just because she was a women, erodes that organizations credibility and paints them as practicing the same type of sexism they claim to fight.
While having endorsements may appear to be a great thing, it is a small, often connected, group of individuals who are deciding for the group.
Do your homework on every candidiate, contact them and see how responsive he/she is and then make your choice.
up
Voting closed 0
Support Universal Hub
Help keep Universal Hub going. If you like what we're up to and want to help out, please consider a (completely non-deductible) contribution.
Comments
Oh, really, Mr. Joyce?
I found the following comment about Bob Joyce pretty laughable:
Really, you self-important censorious gasbag? For those who may have forgotten, Joyce organized a picket of a local liquor store (which has given back far more to the community than Joyce has, I'm betting), because it wouldn't knuckle under to his demand that it stop carrying the Boston Phoenix.
I was ..
...just trying to figure out if that was the same guy. Not getting my vote Bob.
Anyone but Joyce
But does the article tell me where I can get the lawn sign for my Weld Street House that says "I'll vote for anyone who isn't Bob Joyce"? Ever since he ran against Senator Walsh solely on his anti-gay marriage platform (and *nothing* else) I've been against him.
Districting
I'm curious, how do people in W. Roxbury feel about the way the district is drawn? Is there an overlap in concerns between them and Brookline, etc., or would it be better to divide it another way.
The South End is split in two, which means half of us vote with Chinatown and the North End while the other half are South End and Roxbury.
Dueling endorsements
Pamela Julian, the lone Brookline candidate in the race, reports she was endorsed by the progressive Brookline Pax. But Boston NOW's nod went to Paul Sullivan:
Kelly Tynan has a few too
Mass Women's Political Caucus (a lot larger than NOW, I believe, and they actually endorse women!) as well as a number of unions.
Good people, good race!
poor logic in previous comment
I can't speak to the size of Mass Women's Political Caucus, which I doubt is larger than NOW, because its a national organization (perhaps you meant the MA chapter of NOW?), but I will say that any group that wishes to advance its cause has the responsibility of endorsing the candidate it feels best reflects its values and that they feel will most effectively advocate for them. Your assertion that because the Mass Women's Political Caucus is somehow more credible than NOW because it endorsed Tynan, by your intimation just because she was a women, erodes that organizations credibility and paints them as practicing the same type of sexism they claim to fight.
Endorsements
While having endorsements may appear to be a great thing, it is a small, often connected, group of individuals who are deciding for the group.
Do your homework on every candidiate, contact them and see how responsive he/she is and then make your choice.