Superintendent candidate would decentralize Boston schools
Tommy Chang, who currently oversees 115,000 students in 132 schools in Los Angeles, says moving BPS to the next level would require giving all schools far greater autonomy than most now have.
"All schools deserve levels of autonomy and should be doing innovative things," Chang told members of the School Committee today.
Chang is one of four finalists for superintendent being interviewed this week. The School Committee decides Tuesday whom to pick.
Chang cited Mayor Walsh's goal of launching innovation in every neighborhood and said all BPS schools part of that. Chang said that in his job as local superintendent for the Intensive Support and Innovation Center for the Los Angeles school system, he is proud of setting up a system in which schools select from a menu of educational systems and programs, rather than being forced to try to teach everything alike, and in which central administrators work more to support schools in their goals than just setting directives.
He said he oversees three types of schools: Schools that have consistently underperformed, pilot schools and schools that have "robust partnerships with outside organizations." Each school turnaround plan has to be unique because of each school's unique history and makeup, he said. Rather than coming up with a 200-page document that nobody reads, he said he and his team sit down with a school's teachers and parents and come up with two or three key strategies - with intensive support from central administration to help the school achieve that.
He said that over the past 2 1/2 years, graduation rates in the schools he oversees - part of a larger 600,000-student system - have increased 15%, to 70%, attendance is up and suspensions are down.
Chang said that if you Google teaching methods from the 1800s, 1900s and 2000s, not much has changed except for the technology and the greater use of color. But "it's such a different world" now and kids are getting content from everywhere. "That should be happening in our schools," and part of his job, he said, would be figuring out how to teach teachers in how to work with and deal with that.
In response to a question on how to increase school funding, Chang said one of the first things he would do as superintendent is to look at why Boston currently spends $16,000 per student - twice as much as Los Angeles. "I deeply want to understand why that is."
Chang, who came to the US from Taiwan at age 6, started out as a biology teacher at Compton High School. He recalled taking on the extra job of coaching the girl's softball team, which had never won a game - and which finally did in his third year as coach. And he said he took lessons from that experience that he still follows as an administrator:
"You have to be willing to invest in teams and you have to build team culture," he said. He said all of the members of his staff are given a "challenge coin" which they present to each other outside the office and, instead of sharing a drink as in the military, share complements. And "equal is not equitable" - each team member has his or her own unique needs and goals and needs to be coached differently.
Chang said he would tweak Boston's emphasis on early education to ensure a focus on early literacy. This, he said, would help with the issue of students coming into first grade doing well and then starting to fall behind in the third grade. And he said that while repairing Madison Park's vocational programs, he would also try to layer in some more traditional acadmic classes there - because in today's economy, voke students need certain academic programs as well to succeed.
Committee members asked him why in the world he would want to leave warm Los Angeles for frozen Boston.
"Hanley Ramirez did," he joked.
He said he's gained a national reputation for his work but had not applied for jobs anywhere else. "Boston matters," he said. "Boston is actually unique in the sense in that it really is a hub for culture and innovation that you don't find in some other areas. ... I'm psyched [to be considered]. This is the district I want."
Also see:
Change's Boston application.
School superintendent candidate saddened by what he sees in Boston.
Superintendent candidate knows Boston challenges first hand.
School superintendent candidate says Boston just too good an opportunity to pass up.
Ad:
Comments
Scorecard
use of excessive buzz words - 10 points
interesting ideas about decentralization + 20 points
specific interest in figuring out why BPS spends so much per student + 30 points
use of the word 'hub' when referring to Boston in a non-ironic manner - 500 points
Points for facing a challenge
What radical ideas he has to challenge a communist/socialist institution of central planning, control, and unions! I wish him the best of luck in the face of insurmountable odds.
I bet you they hire this Chang guy.
I have a good feeling.
$16,000 per pupil
So I really hope that when Chang says he is going to look into why we are spending $16,000 per pupil when asked about Boston's budge that he meant he needed to spend more. If he thinks $16,000 per student is a lot he should see what Cambridge spends per pupil. As a teacher I hope he wants to spend more because if he thinks that we can spend less and get better results he is highly mistaken.
Really?
Couple of questions:
1) How much more money - $1000, $5000, $10,000?
2) What are you going to do with that money?
3) What is the penalty for failure if you don't deliver?
As I've noted before and as a point of reference - over the past 12 years we have increased the expenditure per pupil by about 70% with virtually no improvement in 10th grade MCAS scores relative to the rest of the state.
Some more spending details
Sorry to not go back a full 12 years, but I'm on a device that won't run Excel macros so I can't really use the DOE spreadsheets that go back that far. If you look at the data that's more easily available on the DOE's site, you can look at budget data from FY08-FY13, though.
In FY08 Boston was spending 17% above its foundation budget. By FY13 that amount had gone up to 19%. The reason that I choose to look at spending levels above the foundation budget is that it provides some context to the budget increases. The foundation budget takes into account all kinds of factors, including student demographics, enrollment, and cost of living (the assumption is that salary levels are higher in areas where the cost of living is higher). In other words, it's a rough estimate of the minimum amount that the district might be expected to spend to educate its students. So, while the budget has been going up, it's not like it's going up disproportionately when compared to what the state formula expects the district's expenses to be. If you think spending 19% above foundation is a lot, you can scroll down to the bottom of the FY13 report and note that it is just about exactly the state average. Of course, there is plenty more to say about net school spending vs. total school spending, etc. This isn't meant to be a comprehensive defense of BPS spending levels, I'm just pointing out that the rate of increase in the budget might be a bit less crazy than the somewhat eye-popping level suggested by the statement that spending has gone up 70%.
Again, sorry to have not gone back to FY03 or as far forward as FY15. I'd be happy to look at those numbers when I get a chance - I honestly have no idea if increases during the span from FY08 to FY13 are typical.
Per pupil costs
How does this number compare with the so-called "desirable" suburban systems? Is it an apples to apples comparison (by that I mean are the costs computed in the same way, not are the situations of the students comparable)?
I am not trolling, but I don't have time to look it up, either.
I found a minute - Boston spending seems to be about even
So the spending in Boston actually appears to be about 17,600, which is right there with Wellesley and Newton.
I presume that this is an apples to apples comparison, since the numbers come from DOE, but I could be wrong in that (I don't have time to go look at the footnotes, etc.)
Cambridge stands out as being off the charts (all those nearest to Cambridge seem to be geographically isolated and/or really small, which would explain it, but wow, Cambridge!)
Cambridge
Couple things:
1) They have a very generous tax base - like Boston, lots of commercial, like Brookline, very expensive residential - plus lots of new construction and I believe the most generous pilot donor in the state - one guess.
2) Cambridge only has about 5% of the population in the schools compared to 10-15% in most other communities - so they can spend less than other districts as a percentage of their total budget on schools and still spend 2-3 times every other district in the state. To paraphrase The Graduate - One word - Demographics.
Only sort of apples to apples
That report is apples to apples only if you think every kid is equally expensive to educate. Pretty much no one thinks this is the case, which is why the state calculates a foundation budget for each school district based (mostly) on student need. The foundation budget is (more or less) the target amount that the state expects the district to spend to be eligible for state aid. Districts are free to exceed their foundation budget amount, and most do, many by a significant amount.
For FY15, Boston's foundation budget works out to $12,375.64 per student. Newton and Wellesley (the other two districts you mention) are at $9,745.08 and $9,365.83, respectively. All three districts are spending at around the same level, but Newton and Wellesley are outspending their foundation budget by a lot more than Boston.
Also, if you're comparing Boston's total expenditures to its foundation budget, note that spending that counts towards meeting the foundation budget does not include every expense that the school district is responsible for. Most notably, transportation is not included.
If LAUSD is really educating their students on ~$8,000 per student I'd be amazed. The table you linked to shows that every single school district in Massachusetts spends significantly more than that. Whether or not you think the Boston school budget should shrink, I hope most everyone can agree that a funding level that low isn't anything we should be striving for.
Source?
Hey Adam - what is your source on this? Are you able to see the interview or read the transcript? I'm curious and would like to check out the interview (with no offense intended to your excellent summaries).
BPS Web site
Meet the candidates. They're livestreaming the School Committee interviews each day at 1 p.m. I don't know if they've archived them somewhere, though.
Thanks!
Cool - thanks, Adam.
Archive
Archive here:
http://www.ustream.tv/search?q=boston
School spending per pupil
Here is a link to a chart showing school spending per student for each district in Massachusetts.
http://profiles.doe.mass.edu/state_report/ppx.aspx
There generally isn't a neat relationship between the quality of the school (measured by test scores, graduation rates, etc.) or the level of need (measured by poverty, etc.) and school spending. You'll see some highly-rated districts with high levels of spending and some with lower levels of spending; same for struggling districts. An interesting statistics problem.... an even more interesting policy question.
(And money isn't everything)
... there's always the debate between people who say money isn't everything, so we should give the schools less money.... and those who agree that money isn't everything, so we should be sure to complement a reasonable school budget with good leadership and strong school, family and community partnerships.
Funny thing about those people
People who say that money isn't the answer to every problem never fail to ask for more money when they run into a problem.
We have Bedden now...YOU should hire Chang.
I come from up north and my family went through the Newton school system Currently, I live in Richmond, VA. I feel like I should do everyone a good turn. For the love of all things Holy don't hire Bedden. He is lying. A quick Google search through his Irving history should tell you everything you need to know. Richmond was already a hot mess. He just took us out of the frying pan and threw us into the fire. *head/desk*